DMelt36
Bolland > You
- Joined:
- May 27, 2010
- Posts:
- 13,969
- Liked Posts:
- 8,434
Just saw this article pop up online, it's written by Sean McIndoe (aka DownGoesBrown) over at Grantland, a guy who I've always thought is an excellent hockey writer.
Link is here
I'd encourage you to read the whole thing because he makes a ton of good points for/against Hossa. But his final verdict is quoted below.
Link is here
I'd encourage you to read the whole thing because he makes a ton of good points for/against Hossa. But his final verdict is quoted below.
Let’s assume Hossa sticks around and plays well for at least a few more years, which should get him into the range of 530 goals and 1,150 points. Those are decent numbers, but not overwhelming. Assuming he doesn’t get a sympathetic Selke push in the coming years, he’ll retire without any individual awards — but with two or three (or more) Cup rings.
On paper, I don’t love his case. But here’s the thing: I’ve asked a few people in the hockey world about Hossa, and whenever I do, their eyes light up. They gush about him. The level of respect for his game may be as high as any active player I can think of.
Assuming he doesn’t become eligible in a year with an unusually packed class, my prediction is that his candidacy will generate a ton of debate, with the usual rhetoric on both sides that makes these sorts of conversations so much fun. But ultimately, I’m betting that the selection committee will remember that it’s not the Offensive Hall of Fame, it’s the Hockey Hall of Fame, and hockey is played at both ends of the ice. I think he’ll get in on the first try, and nobody will really bat an eye.