Is Tibs worth the #1 overall pick in the 2014 NBA draft?

Scoot26

Administrator
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 25, 2010
Posts:
41,867
Liked Posts:
29,109
Does anyone think that some of the stars in this league would not want to play for Thibs because of how hard he works his players? Most of these guys are pretty much prima donnas. It might have to be a pretty special guy I think.

Yeah, Carmelo. Unless he's changed.
 

Scoot26

Administrator
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 25, 2010
Posts:
41,867
Liked Posts:
29,109
Without players coaches mean jack. Phil Jackson couldn't take Rose as Batman and Noah as Robin and beat Miami. Nor could Red Auerbach.

If you wouldn't trade Thibs for a shot at Jabari Parker you would just be a terrible GM and there is no way around that fact.

I don't see any GM with a top3 pick trading their pick for Thibs. So the whole thing seems kind of silly. The OP's question was trading with the Knicks, who while are awful, do not own their own pick this year, so we wouldn't be getting anything but a future 1st round draft pick.
 

The Hawk

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2014
Posts:
18,007
Liked Posts:
3,238
Location:
Southern California
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
I'd have to have a no doubt 100% for sure great all-star to trade Thibs. Not sure there are any such in this draft. I might ask for two high number one picks, though.
 

Crystallas

Three if by air
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Jun 25, 2010
Posts:
20,030
Liked Posts:
9,559
Location:
Next to the beef gristle mill
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bulls
Without players coaches mean jack. Phil Jackson couldn't take Rose as Batman and Noah as Robin and beat Miami. Nor could Red Auerbach.

If you wouldn't trade Thibs for a shot at Jabari Parker you would just be a terrible GM and there is no way around that fact.

No, I would be a good GM for keeping my sure things, and still trying to acquire other assets and star players. Good players want to play for good coaches and win with good coaches. You can have great players and not win anything. Coaches are just as important as players. See Lakers, Nets, Knicks.
 

Hoodey

Member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
557
Liked Posts:
82
Does anyone think that some of the stars in this league would not want to play for Thibs because of how hard he works his players? Most of these guys are pretty much prima donnas. It might have to be a pretty special guy I think.

Take everything you just said, go back to the 1990s...

Now, sub Thibs for Sloan and you're a Utah Jazz fan.. because that's what we are.. the Utah Jazz without a player as good as Karl Malone.

Being the team that would make Bobby Knight the happiest a) wins you nothing and b) draws no free agents. You know what draws players. "Do those guys work hard or not in Miami? I don't know. What I do know is .. they're REALLY f-ing (listen to this next word...) GOOD .. I want to play THERE!"
 

Hoodey

Member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
557
Liked Posts:
82
I don't see any GM with a top3 pick trading their pick for Thibs. So the whole thing seems kind of silly. The OP's question was trading with the Knicks, who while are awful, do not own their own pick this year, so we wouldn't be getting anything but a future 1st round draft pick.

What I read was, "is he worth the #1 pick?" The answer is yes. I guess the greater question is... "say team X has a pick in the top 5 or 6, would you do it?"

YES. One more shot at a guy who could be THE guy? The answer is you keep taking those shots until you get two guys good enough to go toe to toe with the league, THEN you worry about having guys like Noah, Gibson, Butler and a good coach. I can get a good coach to coach Rose and Cousins and I can get role players to play with Rose and Cousins or Parker or whoever.
 

Hoodey

Member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
557
Liked Posts:
82
I'd have to have a no doubt 100% for sure great all-star to trade Thibs. Not sure there are any such in this draft. I might ask for two high number one picks, though.

Jabari Parker...

The end
 

Hoodey

Member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
557
Liked Posts:
82
No, I would be a good GM for keeping my sure things, and still trying to acquire other assets and star players. Good players want to play for good coaches and win with good coaches. You can have great players and not win anything. Coaches are just as important as players. See Lakers, Nets, Knicks.

Since when do the players who are sure things make the best players?

Was Olden Polynice more of a sure thing? Or was Scottie Pippen? Vlade Divac or Kobe Bryant?

Thibs doesn't have the PLAYERS to win here. Any chance to get closer to having that talent is worth a coach or role players until you get that talent.
 

Crystallas

Three if by air
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Jun 25, 2010
Posts:
20,030
Liked Posts:
9,559
Location:
Next to the beef gristle mill
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bulls
Since when do the players who are sure things make the best players?

Was Olden Polynice more of a sure thing? Or was Scottie Pippen? Vlade Divac or Kobe Bryant?

Thibs doesn't have the PLAYERS to win here. Any chance to get closer to having that talent is worth a coach or role players until you get that talent.

You're debating yourself, because none of that was my point.

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_A...eralize_your_Opponent.27s_Specific_Statements


But since I have you saying that Thibs doesn't have players(your opinion).... well, he's still winning anyways. That is why I want to keep him AND give him players. He's a coach, this isn't an either or situation or argument. His salary doesn't count against the cap.
 

Crystallas

Three if by air
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Jun 25, 2010
Posts:
20,030
Liked Posts:
9,559
Location:
Next to the beef gristle mill
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bulls
Yeah, Carmelo. Unless he's changed.

Nah, Melo isn't the type of guy who wants to phone in games, and heatcheck until he scores a boatload for a game to shut up critics when the pressure gets to high. We don't have to worry about Melo wanting to play hard, thus why he wants to play with Thibs, who would hold him accountable.
 

Hoodey

Member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
557
Liked Posts:
82
You're debating yourself, because none of that was my point.

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_A...eralize_your_Opponent.27s_Specific_Statements


But since I have you saying that Thibs doesn't have players(your opinion).... well, he's still winning anyways. That is why I want to keep him AND give him players. He's a coach, this isn't an either or situation or argument. His salary doesn't count against the cap.

No.. it's not my opinion. Put Noah next to the guys who were the second talents on the last 33 champions.. the vast majority of them.. he doesn't pass the laugh test as being comparable.

He's winning? Or he's winning REGULAR SEASON games?

I have him at 1 win 4 losses in the conference finals when it counts. He's Jerry Sloan of today. Phil Jackson preached none of what Sloan did and didn't run this hokie, corn pone, "go get a rug burn and make mean faces" type of operation. He just had guys who were better ATHLETES than Sloan had, they had fun, didn't have to preach the morals of the game.. and just dropped sack on the league man.
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
47,468
Liked Posts:
36,825
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
Seriously, is this idea even being entertained.
 

Hoodey

Member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
557
Liked Posts:
82
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_A...eralize_your_Opponent.27s_Specific_Statements

That. LOL, did you even read it?

Nobody said what you claimed they are saying.

I argued with two specific points in that post.. what you think about how I frame an argument according to your wiki page means jack shit to me.

This is from Mr....

"I think Cousins takes games off, more than Noah"

later in the thread

"What we were all saying all along was that the Kings wouldn't trade Cousins anyway."

No need not to generalize. Pro organization fans regurgitate the same moronic BS over and over. One may appear to be a zebra, the other a mountain lion the other a tiger... but they're all just cats.
 

Crystallas

Three if by air
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Jun 25, 2010
Posts:
20,030
Liked Posts:
9,559
Location:
Next to the beef gristle mill
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bulls
what you think about how I frame an argument according to your wiki page means jack shit to me.

Then as long as you know, you are making a point then arguing against your own point. This is sometimes seen as schizophrenia.
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
47,468
Liked Posts:
36,825
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
Did I just drop a money shot on your mother?

Remember the "are you stupid" later when you try to run to the moderators after you started in first.

So, that's a yes?
 

JosMin

Entirely too much tuna
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Nov 22, 2011
Posts:
8,201
Liked Posts:
3,273
Location:
Jeffersonville, Indiana
Great job contradicting yourself!

Since when do the players who are sure things make the best players?

Was Olden Polynice more of a sure thing? Or was Scottie Pippen? Vlade Divac or Kobe Bryant?

Thibs doesn't have the PLAYERS to win here. Any chance to get closer to having that talent is worth a coach or role players until you get that talent.

Translation -- players who are viewed as a "sure thing" coming into the draft don't always turn into the best player. Kinda' funny, because right before this you said:

Jabari Parker...

The end

This is you essentially saying that Jabari Parker is totally a sure thing and is worth giving up a fantastic coach for a guy who's never played one minute in the NBA. Okay. Cool. So, which is it?
 

Top