Yep -- second and third, one out in the fourth, and Q just melted down like crazy. Loaded the bases in the process. No way he's gonna get past the fourth, the way this is going...
Oh, yeah. He only allowed one run out of that jam, and pitched into the seventh, IIRC. Quality start out of that "inevitable" Quintana meltdown.
Just goes to show you, it makes no sense to immediately assume you're going to end up in a butt-pounding federal penitentiary the moment you see a cop car with its lights a-going in your rear view mirror. Ninety-nine times out of a hundred, he's not after you; you're just in his way. Same thing with baseball -- just because your pitcher gets in a jam doesn't mean you're immediately doomed to endure the worst possible outcome, people.
I'd agree with y'all that the games are played on the field and not on paper, if y'all would just stop assuming that the numbers are only wrong when they indicate that the play on the field will average around a certain point. Why rail against a scientific method that says our players will have good days and bad days, unless you're trying to support your phobic insistence that, the moment one thing goes against us, we can just assume the worst? You're really making a different case not to play out the game -- in that argument, you just want to assume the worst outcome and declare the Cubs as having failed, big-time.
So, next time, when one of our pitchers gets into a jam, or one of our hitters gets to an 0-2 count, maybe let the inning, or at least the at-bat, play out before declaring that we're doomed, we're doomed, oh, the pain...