justaChifan
Active member
- Joined:
- Feb 4, 2013
- Posts:
- 635
- Liked Posts:
- 205
Again
he should be gone at the deadline
Sent from Hawkwriters "I was at the game and family dayzz with teh energyzzz" scouting report using Tapatalk.
he should be gone at the deadline
Sent from Hawkwriters "I was at the game and family dayzz with teh energyzzz" scouting report using Tapatalk.
Always believed in the philosophy that you don't trade someone unless you know exactly who is going to replace that player. So if Stalberg goes, who fills in his spot? Curious.
The tying goal for Columbus should have never happened. Keith cannot have that poor of a clearing attempt.
.
I think Saad would replace him just fine on the third line.
The issue with Stalberg is I doubt he signs this offseason. Might as well get something for him now. Saad (or when Bolland comes back Shaw) could do well on the third line. Stalberg could also help with a nice return for either now or the future. Something is better than nothing.
In terms of Carcillo vs Saad on the first line...I think Carcillo is the right choice. Sure Saad is the better and more skilled player, but he didn't compliment Hossa/Toews very well at all. If you play with those two you better produce or help them produce...wasn't happening. I believe Carcillo opens things up and compliments Hossa/Toews well. That first line needs to put up numbers 5on5 and it just wasn't happening as much as it should with Saad.
Always believed in the philosophy that you don't trade someone unless you know exactly who is going to replace that player. So if Stalberg goes, who fills in his spot? Curious.
The only reason to trade Stalberg is IF you get a nice return for him. If not, why not just keep him around for the versatility that he adds to the team? He can skate on all four lines effectively.
As for the Carcillo vs. Saad argument, Carcillo has no place on this team other than the fourth line. There is far too much talent around to have him stinking up one of the other lines. If Q doesn't think the first line is clicking well with Saad on it, he could easily swap Saad and Sharp. The first goal against the Blues the other night is a prime example of what Saad can bring you in terms of speed and skill that Carcillo does not bring to the table.
And for those meatballs out there that think that we need someone on the first line to stand up for Captain and Hoss, the best defense to people gooning it up is to take advantage of the PP's that come from the goonery. Or a guy like Brookbank on the back end when the top line is out there, just like he jumped into the fray on multiple occassions last night. He provides the toughness that all the meatballs loved about Scott, but with some semblance of actual defensive skill.
I don't think it's a move that ought to be done but the implication would be to try and get a "REAL" 2nd line center... I think the thought would then to move Shaw back over to wing
So what if Stalberg doesn't re-sign in the offseason, the point of having the prospects is to deal with that loss, it's about winning the cup anyway.
It isn't about protecting. It is about production. I believe that Carcillo gives that first line more production than Saad. If you take Sharp away from Saad then you hurt Kane and that second line.
Ive been holding off on this thinking that maybe Carcillo could get the Al Secord thing going but its getting pretty obvious that he doesnt have the skates or skills to be top 6, certainly not a top 3. What Im seeing or more like not seeing is his involvement offensively. Speed? Maybe. But more like lack of offensive awareness. He always seem to be late getting into the play...3 on 2 breakouts turning into 2 on 2. Saad always seemed to be in the middle of things. What sticks out even more than the lone assist Carcillo has is the fact that he's only taken 6 shots...that's one a game. Not enough for a top 3 winger on the best team in the league.
Apparently, I wasnt the only one noticing this as Q had the Saad back with Toews & Hoss for the last half of the 3rd period. It'll be interesting to see if they're back together tomorrow morning.