MikeDitkaPolishSausage
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 12, 2013
- Posts:
- 9,892
- Liked Posts:
- 7,634
- Location:
- Black Rainbow’s Grandma’s house.
Man is Jameson Williams a bust as a #12 pick.
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 63,875
- Liked Posts:
- 40,812
I dont recall claiming he was 100% going to be charged. I recall saying be was a dumbass for not getting a CC licence and I stand by that.
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 19,988
- Liked Posts:
- 4,824
"He is facing a charge of carrying a concealed weapon in a motor vehicle." -remydat
More Remy lies, you said exactly that. I told you that no, he was not facing charges, to which you tried to pull another one of your vortex's on.
You also stated the "corrupt Detroit Police" let him go. Well guess what dumbass, it has been confirmed that the Detroit Police were correct in doing so. Why? Because the phone calls they made determined that he had not committed a crime. This was later confirmed by the prosecutors office, and guess what, you ignorant fukk, it is exactly for the reason I told you.
You also went on to say that I lied about the car belonging to his brother, Well guess what dumb ****, it did indeed belong to his brother.
My oh my, you just keep accumulating the "L's".
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 12,791
- Liked Posts:
- 3,933
yep, looks like the States atty general realized there was no case to indict him, he must be a lions fan too, LMAO
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 63,875
- Liked Posts:
- 40,812
Nope you are full of shit as we already had this argument. I said he was facing charges because that is what the article said. So go cry to the Detroit newspaper that said it.
You did not know the car belonged to the brother and tried to claim it as fact then admitted you were just speculating. Sorry.
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 19,988
- Liked Posts:
- 4,824
Everything I said was true, you were full of shit as always.
But I see you are back to double down on stupid........
So tell me Rebydumbass, did he face charges?
yes or no?
Was a right?
yes or no
loser
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 63,875
- Liked Posts:
- 40,812
Per the article in the Detroit news papers yes he faced charges.
Per your own statements at the time you did not know whose car it was and initially lied about that fact.
The End.
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 19,988
- Liked Posts:
- 4,824
I was right, on all accounts.
You were wrong.
I did not lie, I drew a conclusion based on the facts provided, turns out my conclusion was right. Turns out your dumbass was wrong................again and as always.
I said he had not been charged with a crime, I explained why. Your dumbass kept stating you got your information from an article. Guess what, the article was wrong, now wasn't it. Repeating a lie is still a lie, dumbass.
/the real end.
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 63,875
- Liked Posts:
- 40,812
No it wasnt wrong. It said he was facing charges which he was until the prosecutor decided not to charge him. You explained nothing. You gave your opinion which is irrelevant when compared to journalists.
You presented the car thing as fact and then had to admit it was speculation when I asked you to provide evidence of your claim.
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 19,988
- Liked Posts:
- 4,824
I was right, you were wrong. Your stupidity continues to show. It is the prosecutor that decides if he will or will not face charges. They decided that they did not have any legal reason to charge him with a crime. Therefore he was never FACING charges. dumbass. Your are only facing charges if you are in fact charged with a crime. LMAO at your reasoning with the journalism.
Yisus, you are even more a dumbass than I possibly imagined.
Face charges Definition & Meaning
Merriam-Webster
https://www.merriam-webster.com › dictionary › face c...
Nov 13, 2024 — The meaning of FACE CHARGES is to be formally accused of a crime.
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 63,875
- Liked Posts:
- 40,812
He was formally accused of a crime in the warrant. The warrant is a formal document dumbass. Again from the Detroit Free Press.
Late last week, DPD submitted a warrant request to the Wayne County Prosecutor’s Office. Williams is FACING a charge of carrying a concealed weapon in a motor vehicle.
You cant really be this stupid. The Detroit Free Press said he was FACING a charge because a FORMAL warrant request was made and in it he was FORMALLY ACCUSED of a crime. That FORMAL request was reviewed and it was decided he not be put on trial so now he is no longer facing charges.
Not sure what confuses you but the Detroit Free Press is more credible than you and they used the word correctly. Sorry.
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 19,988
- Liked Posts:
- 4,824
No dumbass, as I have clearly illustrated, facing charges means that the prosecutor has filed a charge with the judicial system accusing you of a crime. It means they plan on prosecuting you.
THIS IS THE VERY DEFINITION OF THE TERM
The Detroit police department send a request to the prosecutor asking them to examine the facts and determine if a crime had been committed. The prosecutor examined the case, and determined that as the law reads, no crime had been committed. You do not face charges when you have not broken the law, you ignorant dumbfukk.
Whether or not the free press stated that is irrelevant, as it was wrong. I pointed this out to you, yet, over and over again your dumbass keeps bringing it up. Guess what, the papers also once reported Dewey defeated Truman.
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 63,875
- Liked Posts:
- 40,812
Not what the article or your definition said and you are not a lawyer. What your article said is he has to be formally accused not formally charged. He was formally accused of a weapons crime in the warrant request hence why the DFP said he was facing charges. The warrant request is a formal document and it accuses him of a crime and presents the evidence. The prosecuter then decides if the evidence is sufficent to proceed.
As I said the last time you stayed at a Holiday Inn Express and pretended to be a lawyer, if you have an issue then write to the DFP and see if they print a retraction. Until then I don't take legal advice from CCS members.
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 19,988
- Liked Posts:
- 4,824
Wrong again, as always. You lost, you look like an idiot, again.
Jameson Williams will not face charges stemming from an October traffic stop of Lions receiver
The traffic stop occurred on Oct. 8
Jameson Williams will not face a concealed weapon charge
Lions wide receiver Jameson Williams will not be charged with any crime related to an October traffic stop in Detroit.
Prosecutors were reviewing whether Williams should be charged for carrying a concealed weapon without a license when he and his brother were pulled over for speeding. Williams was a passenger in the car and did not have a concealed weapons license for his firearm.
Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said on Monday that the facts of the case do not support charges under the law.
Pay careful attention to the parts that say he will "NOT FACE CHARGES" which is different than " the charges have been dismissed".
Detroit Lions' Jameson Williams won't face gun charges following traffic stop
Lions WR Jameson Williams was the passenger in a vehicle driven by his brother Oct. 8 when Detroit Police pulled Williams' brother over for speeding.
www.freep.com
Detroit Police had submitted a warrant request last month for charges against Williams after the department opened an internal investigation into how a supervisor on the scene of the traffic stop handled the case.
A warrant request is not the same as facing charges. It is the Polices asking the prosecutor if charges SHOULD be filed.
- Warrant request
A police officer submits an affidavit to a judge or magistrate to request a warrant. The affidavit must establish probable cause that a crime was committed and that the named person committed it. The prosecutor reviews the case and determines if charges should be filed.
"Because the case law is silent regarding the specific issue, and the legislative intent of the CPL statute does not support charges under these facts, no charges will issue in this matter, and the warrant is denied," Worthy's office wrote in a news release."
Stop being dumber than a box of rocks.
/end debate
Last edited:
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 63,875
- Liked Posts:
- 40,812
You are stupid. Your definition says that facing charges means to be formally accused of a crimeWrong again, as always. You lost, you look like an idiot, again.
Jameson Williams will not face charges stemming from an October traffic stop of Lions receiver
The traffic stop occurred on Oct. 8www.cbssports.com
Jameson Williams will not face a concealed weapon charge
Lions wide receiver Jameson Williams will not be charged with any crime related to an October traffic stop in Detroit.www.nbcsports.com
Prosecutors were reviewing whether Williams should be charged for carrying a concealed weapon without a license when he and his brother were pulled over for speeding. Williams was a passenger in the car and did not have a concealed weapons license for his firearm.
Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said on Monday that the facts of the case do not support charges under the law.
Pay careful attention to the parts that say he will "NOT FACE CHARGES" which is different than " the charges have been dismissed".
Detroit Lions' Jameson Williams won't face gun charges following traffic stop
Lions WR Jameson Williams was the passenger in a vehicle driven by his brother Oct. 8 when Detroit Police pulled Williams' brother over for speeding.www.freep.com
Detroit Police had submitted a warrant request last month for charges against Williams after the department opened an internal investigation into how a supervisor on the scene of the traffic stop handled the case.
A warrant request is not the same as facing charges. It is the Polices asking the prosecutor if charges SHOULD be filed.
- Warrant request
A police officer submits an affidavit to a judge or magistrate to request a warrant. The affidavit must establish probable cause that a crime was committed and that the named person committed it. The prosecutor reviews the case and determines if charges should be filed.
"Because the case law is silent regarding the specific issue, and the legislative intent of the CPL statute does not support charges under these facts, no charges will issue in this matter, and the warrant is denied," Worthy's office wrote in a news release."
Stop being dumber than a box of rocks.
/end debate
You then state a warrant request is the following.
- Warrant request
A police officer submits an affidavit to a judge or magistrate to request a warrant. The affidavit must establish probable cause that a crime was committed and that the named person committed it. The prosecutor reviews the case and determines if charges should be filed.
The prosecutor then reviewed and disagreed that probable cause existed. Their disagreement doesnt change the fact the police in their warrant request did in fact formally accuse him of a crime.
Like this is simple. Is the warrant request a formal document? Yes. Did the warrant request accuse him of a crime? Yes. If there was no accusation of a crime then the cops would not have made a warrant request.
So you are wrong. Sorry.
Last edited:
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 19,988
- Liked Posts:
- 4,824
dumbass, nice try at moving the goal posts, but no.
1) The police released him
2) He was never charged.
The rest is just gibberish
Members online NOW
- Member
- Admin
- Mod
- Donor
- HOF
Staff online NOW
-
bamainatlantaYou wake him up, you keep him up