Jarvis Jenkins: What to Offer

WindyCity

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Dec 12, 2011
Posts:
30,816
Liked Posts:
35,414
There are a couple of players on defense that I think are worthy of contract extensions and have shown that they were good value signings, good scheme fits, and have upside to continue to develop in this system.

Jarvis Jenkins

Jenkins arrived with little fanfare as a disappointing 2nd round pick from Washington. Thought of as little more than a depth signing, he has found a home in this system, been shockingly productive and been trusted to play multiple spots and downs and distances.

After re-watching the Chiefs game, where Jenkins was held off the stat sheet, I could see him still having an impact on the game. This shows a consistency to his game and that he is more than just 2-3 splash plays every couple of games.

I started looking at the 3-4 DE contracts from free agency to get an idea about a possible extension.

High End: Jared Odrick [Jacksonville] 4 years 42.5 million/22 guaranteed

Mid Level: Kendall Langford [Indianapolis] 4 years 17 million/3 guaranteed

Comparable:

Corey Peters [Arizona] 3 years 9 million/5.5 guaranteed
Randy Starks [Cleveland] 2 years 6.5 million/3.5 guaranteed
Alan Branch [New England] 2 years 4.5 million

Jenkins is younger than the above players and arguably is producing better than those players when they signed those deals. It seems 3-4 million is a comparable base salary and 3-5 million in guarantees would be fair. This puts Jenkins in a very similar position to that of Matt Slauson who was re-signed after a very successful 1 year deal.

My contract offer: 4 years 14 million/5 million guaranteed

This gives Jenkins long term security, a fair market value, and allows the Bears to retain a young player. If Jenkins continue to play out of his mind I would move the offer to closer to Langfords 4 years 17 million/5 guaranteed.
 

Burque

Huevos Rancheros
Joined:
Mar 11, 2015
Posts:
16,053
Liked Posts:
9,524
I think that is about perfect, he is not a super star, and is young enough that if he turns into a super star there would still be a big contract in his future. He gets paid like a producing D lineman and the guarantee isn't dangerous to us long term.
 
Joined:
Oct 3, 2013
Posts:
1,117
Liked Posts:
868
Location:
Everywhere
I think anywhere from 3-4 years & $3-4M per year seems right, Windy.

Not sure he'll even be a top 3-4 DE but if he can provide like he has lately in terms of pass rush & stays stout vs run, they are in good shape w/ him at that price.
 

AussieBear

Guest
#aussiefanfarepriortothesigning #sawitcalledit2015fa

4/14 may be a fair deal, being he is worth a little more to the bears to keep.

the art of almost.

a once up and coming thick one with the name to drive dat search.. her name siri...

QOpmviE.gif


15241544.gif
 

Top