- Joined:
- Jul 31, 2010
- Posts:
- 4,967
- Liked Posts:
- 697
Assuming we're talking about Nady and Dunn, yes. Nady would just be for a year while we free up payroll to sign someone else or make a trade in 2011. Dunn would be signing ourselves up for three or four years of piss poor play at first base.
The only thing Adam Dunn is good at is hitting home runs. The last thing we need is more defensive ineptitude. Ideally, the Cubs can trade for Adrian Gonzalez and solve this conundrum. But I doubt that will happen.
Okay, so if the goal is to free up payroll, why is it that we are paying someone 3 million dollars to suck, when we can have someone do that for league minimum.
Dunn is piss poor now? He's only good at hitting homeruns? Forget about his outrageously high walk totals. Sure, Dunn wouldn't be the best option defensively. He will probably suck there. But he would be the most consistent player on the team with the bat.
So instead of signing Dunn, you want to sign Adrian Gonzalez, a guy who is going to command around 25 million on the open market. That's just a stupid business decision.