- Joined:
- Jun 25, 2010
- Posts:
- 41,447
- Liked Posts:
- 28,550
But they dont' want to give up anybody to acquire such a shooter.
Not having Derrick Rose the last several years is what made them not close enough. Couple that with a reliable 2nd and 3rd scoring option and you can see why. This year, they have all the pieces needed IMO, but they'll need to step up their defense the last 2 months here. And, obviously play well in the playoffs. There' still a lot to see here.The Bulls are a team that would rather fail through inaction then make a bad move. I guess a bad move can hurt you more in the long run. Over valuing your players and picks rarely works out in the long run.
I guess this is why the Bulls have been in close, but not close enough mode for a few years.
We crippled Marco?We don't need a shooter. This off-season was all-about getting shooters. We have shooters.
We need a defensive minded wing that is efficient enough on offense to get by(I'm sick of this, Jimmy can guard everyone all the time expectation). And we need to get that damn dedicated shooting coach, so we don't keep bringing in players that lead the league in 3FG%, just to cripple them, and watch them leave to another team and lead the league again.
We crippled Marco?
I always just assumed Marco was that guy who never really played well except when given minutes and by that I mean like 20mpg+
How about this guy? We won't have to trade anyone or give up a draft pick. :dunno:
![]()
I agree. Thibs would throw him in because he was the next guy off the bench to come in and give whoever a rest, and Marco had to play defense, which resulted in a lot of flops. Marco couldn't play his game, because he had to play a role that didn't suit him on a team with a scheme that had no place for him. Once he got going, then he had some good games.
Which is all my point. The Bulls should be targeting square pegs to fit square holes.
well word is they have maintained contact with Ronnie Brewer so careful what you wish for
:derbulls:
Nah. It'll start this calendar year after Thibodeau gets fired for not playing him.In 2016 or 2017 maybe.
You really need to stop with the Thibs getting fired shit.Nah. It'll start this calendar year after Thibodeau gets fired for not playing him.
Well 2 things here:You really need to stop with the Thibs getting fired shit.
I know he's not advocating it, he's taking the pessimistic view that the FO is going to fire Thibs, pretty much no matter what, because of the disagreements we hear in the media.Well 2 things here:
1. It doesn't sound (to me at least reading that one post) that he's advocating Thibs get fired.
2. While I don't agree with the firing of Thibs, the Bulls FO is completely within their rights to fire him if he doesn't get this team to the Finals this year.
Normally I'd agree with you on the definition of 'falling short,' but with the expectations this team had I see no reason not to believe the FO is thinking Finals or bust.I know he's not advocating it, he's taking the pessimistic view that the FO is going to fire Thibs, pretty much no matter what, because of the disagreements we hear in the media.
If the Bulls fall short in the playoffs, and to me that isn't the Finals, that's not getting out of the second round...I think they should fire him, especially given how things go in the NBA.
Fair enough.Normally I'd agree with you on the definition of 'falling short,' but with the expectations this team had I see no reason not to believe the FO is thinking Finals or bust.