Les Grossman
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jun 22, 2011
- Posts:
- 14,363
- Liked Posts:
- 13,007
For some reason I think of players who rely on explosiveness as more injury prone. Idk.
Ouch credibility gone since Gregory played at Nebraska
I am pretty sure people are on here spouting nonsense about Gregory playing at or near 260lbs at Wisco all the time, so no.
Hyberpole often or...? By people you mean one person and by often you mean one maybe two threads yes? Keep your nonsense outta here. And for fuck sake get the team right for once.
Continue on your Hyberpole crusade then because there were NEVER a lot of people saying he played near 260. What's it like to live in fantasy land? The was a grand total of One poster who said he read or heard that somewhere. One does not equal A lot. Not where I come from anyways.No, I mean a lot of people spouting the garbage that he played near 260lbs and then got sick before the combine and lost a bunch of weight.....all of which is nonsense that his agent/he cooked up in obvious fashion.
So nahagain.
No, I mean a lot of people spouting the garbage that he played near 260lbs and then got sick before the combine and lost a bunch of weight.....all of which is nonsense that his agent/he cooked up in obvious fashion.
So nah again.
I'll proofread my posts more carefully when I am unemployed and not doing other things outside posting on this message board ala a lot of the regulars here.. lol.
Thanks for the share. Great read. What I find odd is those who claim a lack of production for Dupree. Dupree and Fowler played similar roles in that they were asked to do multiple things but Dupree was asked to drop into coverage even more than Fowler.
In 3 years Fowler produced 14.5 sacks while Bud produced 23.5 in four. Both players produced 2.5 sacks their FR year. In their SO years Fowler produced 3.5 sacks and Bud produced 6.5. In their JR years Fowler produced 8.5 sacks and Bud produced 7. Bud produced 7.5 sacks in his SR season and Fowler declared early.
Considering the amount of time Dupree spent in coverage those numbers are more than enough and when looking at him as an NFL prospect you are making projections. Judging by his size and elite athleticism and strong tape I think Dupree projects very well.
This post was in no way meant to discredit Fowler as I think he is the most complete OLB day 1, but to show the difference of perception VS reality.
I always mix those two up....constantly.
If a typo wipes ""credibility" to you....then you're a hopeless tard anyway.
Welcome to the interwebs.
Your credibility was shot way before you mixed up Wisconsin and Nebraska. Which... Come on... You're trying to pass that off as a typo?
Lol, am I actually supposed to respond to nonsense like this...
Yes, I typed Wisco instead of Nebbie.
Congrats, you got your typo.
G-d, when the slow people discovered the internet, all was lost.
God, when people started believing that TOS wasn't a newb-level shit-talker... Well that never happened.
So to answer your question: No. You're not supposed to respond. You're supposed to STFU until you have a clue about what you're writing about.
You are literally on a NFL fan message board trolling someone because they mistakingly typed the wrong college football program name ......
This is your life...wow......wow....
What I like about Dupree is that he was able to produce on a sucky defense. I'm hopeful that if the Bears draft him he will be able to produce on our sucky defense.
GREAT article. Fascinating read.
Dupree might appear to be too rich a selection at #7 overall, but if you have concerns about Beasley's size, you settle on Dupree.
Like the article says, the perception is its a reach, but if he can achieve Wake or Orakpo-like production, you turn in the card and don't think twice.
Fuck Kiper and McShay's draft board - trust your eyes.