- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 9,505
- Liked Posts:
- 1,733
The only reason you people love Hinrich so much is because he's a whiteboy.
RACISTS!!!!!!!!!!
*predicts your next avatar will be of Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton*
The only reason you people love Hinrich so much is because he's a whiteboy.
RACISTS!!!!!!!!!!
I believe Crys is saying that even a teenage Rose > Ben Gordon.
Nope.
*predicts your next avatar will be of Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton*
In hindsight, Hinrich helped you in more ways, but no, I can't say Gordon was inferior to Hinrich...not at all. Hinrich was very inefficient from the field shooting while Gordon was fairly efficient most of his time with Chicago.
Neither were top 10 at their positions...and Gordon was cold blooded in the clutch, Hinrich was horrible in most clutch situations when it came to shooting the ball.
On a grander scale, its like comparing Amare to Lamar Odom...Odom helps you in more ways, but is he better than Amare? I don't think so. I am talking about prime Odom, not the guy in Dallas right now...
Hinrich more versatile but couldn't make an impact in basketball games the way Gordon did.
There's more to the game than scoring a lot of points. Hinrich was our best on ball defender. Something BG was never good at.In hindsight, Hinrich helped you in more ways, but no, I can't say Gordon was inferior to Hinrich...not at all. Hinrich was very inefficient from the field shooting while Gordon was fairly efficient most of his time with Chicago.
Neither were top 10 at their positions...and Gordon was cold blooded in the clutch, Hinrich was horrible in most clutch situations when it came to shooting the ball.
On a grander scale, its like comparing Amare to Lamar Odom...Odom helps you in more ways, but is he better than Amare? I don't think so. I am talking about prime Odom, not the guy in Dallas right now...
Hinrich more versatile but couldn't make an impact in basketball games the way Gordon did.
Mid-2000's Bulls guards.
#1. Kirk
#2. Rose JALEN YOU SHORT TERMED MEMORY FOOLS!
#3. Gordon
He did, and he was pretty good at it.You mean guy in the suit behind the TV Desk??!? No way, he never played basketball.
:smh: Next you're are gonna say that loudmouth high pitched fat guy played basketball.
That isn't in dispute though. No one will argue that Gordon was a better scorer, that was his job. Kirk was a decent scorer, but he had things that put him over Gordon more than people want to give him credit for.We're probably overvaluing scoring in this context because that's what the Bulls need more of. It's the only true weakness this team has (outside of the ridiculous amount of injuries). Sure, Hinrich is a better defender than Gordon, but he sure as shit isn't a better scorer. I think that's why everyone is bringing up Gordon.
There's more to the game than scoring a lot of points. Hinrich was our best on ball defender. Something BG was never good at.
Hinrich could guard 3 positions effectively, while BG couldn't even guard his. People hardly ever lit Kirk up, while Ben was getting lit up more often than not. Hinrch was a point guard and not a scoring PG, he was a passing guard that ran the offense. Gordon's job was to score and he did it well, but his defense and ball handling sucked major balls.
You seem to over value scoring while under valuing defense and the other parts of the game. Or am I misinterpreting you?
We're probably overvaluing scoring in this context because that's what the Bulls need more of. It's the only true weakness this team has (outside of the ridiculous amount of injuries). Sure, Hinrich is a better defender than Gordon, but he sure as shit isn't a better scorer. I think that's why everyone is bringing up Gordon.
So then tell me...who is better? Odom or Amare?
If I overvalued scoring, why would I even bother comparing 2 guys who have a 7 point disparity in career ppg? I think you misinterpret what I am saying, most definitely.
We're probably overvaluing scoring in this context because that's what the Bulls need more of. It's the only true weakness this team has (outside of the ridiculous amount of injuries). Sure, Hinrich is a better defender than Gordon, but he sure as shit isn't a better scorer. I think that's why everyone is bringing up Gordon.
The comparison of Amare to Odom is not relevant to that of Hinrich and Gordon. Stoudemire garners complaints because he is not a great rebounder and not a good defender when he has physical tools that give him the capability of being that. While it's true that Gordon's greatest strength (scoring) could indeed change a basketball game, it is also true that Gordon had liabilities (defense/ball-handling) that could also change a basketball game that took away from his overall game. Hinrich did not have great strengths but he did have some strengths and no real liability to speak of. And if Gordon is "cllutch" than Hinrich can't be far away from that label.
No need to be that hostile about it. That's why I asked if I was misinterpreting you. Didn't want to make the wrong assumption.So then tell me...who is better? Odom or Amare?
If I overvalued scoring, why would I even bother comparing 2 guys who have a 7 point disparity in career ppg? I think you misinterpret what I am saying, most definitely.