List of every Bears QB drafted in the 1st round

PhilEBuster

shoopster - Then. Now. Forever.
Donator
Joined:
Sep 20, 2023
Posts:
2,459
Liked Posts:
1,771
Location:
Cyberspace, USA
To me "going for it" is trading the 1st pick 2 years in a row, unheard of. If he takes picks and players and hits plus gets proper
coaching staff to bring out the natural talent in Fields they are setup for years of success and Poles owns Chicago.
Going for it is "go big or go home".
That would be unheard of. Poles would have to have an awful lot of faith in Fields (and Eberflus?) to take that approach. Based on what Fields has shown it's tremendously risky and could deprive him of the chance of ever selecting "his own" quarterback if Fields doesn't suddenly start taking big steps forward. I would be surprised if Poles was willing to do that (particularly with regard to Eberflus), but you never know . . .
 

pdxbearsfan

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 8, 2021
Posts:
5,662
Liked Posts:
2,761
No doubt Trubisky and Fields were big swings, '94. Neither turned out to be anything remotely close to what was expected, but I personally feel both of them could have been serviceable players in the NFL, even starters, if they had gone to other teams. The Bears took players who turned out to be underachievers and made them much, much worse. They ruined Trubisky's career, and may have done the same to Fields.

To take a big swing, though, you need to wait for the right pitch. The Bears always seem like they're trying to outsmart somebody (trading up for Trubisky, taking Fields even when he mysteriously fell down the board on draft day). They end up outsmarting themselves.

Now here's Caleb Williams widely touted as the #1 quarterback in this draft in this "generation," (whatever that means). I'm not necessarily a Williams guy (there's someone else I'm intrigued by), but it would seem to be a no-brainer for the Bears to draft Williams, as it appears to be for everyone else. But the Bears are arrogant. Will they outsmart themselves yet again? Will Virginia get involved and start pulling King George's strings?

The wildcard here is Poles. I don't think he'll puppet himself to bend to the McCaskey/Accorsi/Polian/any-other-NFL-veteran-we'll-be-surprised- to-hear-is still-alive-when-we-hear-the-Bears-are-consulting-them recommendation. Can he hit on a Super Bowl coaching staff and franchise quarterback in one off-season and write his ticket for another 10 years? He has a tremendous opportunity and I find it difficult to believe he is going to settle for retreads in either direction if he doesn't believe in them, and neither Everlose nor Fields has given him enough reasons to believe in my opinion. Poles has to go for it . . .
No way is Poles going to be a wimp on this, he has the support of Warren and George. He will do his homework, present
the plan and if approved will move forward, no outside consultants needed.
 

pdxbearsfan

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 8, 2021
Posts:
5,662
Liked Posts:
2,761
That would be unheard of. Poles would have to have an awful lot of faith in Fields (and Eberflus?) to take that approach. Based on what Fields has shown it's tremendously risky and could deprive him of the chance of ever selecting "his own" quarterback if Fields doesn't suddenly start taking big steps forward. I would be surprised if Poles was willing to do that (particularly with regard to Eberflus), but you never know . . .
My scenario is new coaches as stated above, no Flus and no Getsy.
 

Toast88

Well-known member
Joined:
May 10, 2014
Posts:
14,886
Liked Posts:
15,052
People are over-thinking it. Why would Poles tie his one shot at being a GM to a statistically sub-par guy he didn’t even pick?
 

Top