Literally how much better will Coal Kmet become if the Bears Literally draft upon Brock Bowers in the 9th pick?

[VickAshley✅️verified]

There is literally so much value not even really considered in terms of intangibles when considering the untangible abilities of Brock Bowers.

Many here have talked upon the topics of Bowers being a jackknife of all trades with blocking and running and wr abilities and space blocking and HB roles but I am of the firmliest of beliefs that he possesses the IT factor of being a coach inside the inside of the dressing rooms and meeting rooms and literally a field general.

Day one he shows Kmet how little value popcorn muscles are and makes him better by showing him how to run through a DB instead of juking themselves even though unlike kmet he can literally wiggle. Day two he teaches him that it is the work you put inside more than the physique. Day 3 he steals his job so that kmet literally has to put chips upon his shoulders to play better and not be some such a slouch. And if kmet acturally becomes good then Bears can trade him and get another tight end more like Bowers and less like Kmet.

 

[DefNextYear]

I think Coal would literally become a diamond under that pressure.

 

[DanielCCSBears]

Brock Bowers is the next N'Keal Harry. He's too big to be a WR and too small to be an effective TE. 6-3 243 isn't going to get it done unless you have a ridiculous ability to break tackles or get open like a WR.

 

[Kurtosis]

Brock Bowers is the next N'Keal Harry. He's too big to be a WR and too small to be an effective TE. 6-3 243 isn't going to get it done unless you have a ridiculous ability to break tackles or get open like a WR.

That’s an absolutely horrendous comp.

 

[Toast88]

Whomst?

 

[Katesboobsrgr8]

I would say somewhere around 1 million better.

 

[KittiesKorner]

Brock Bowers is the next N'Keal Harry. He's too big to be a WR and too small to be an effective TE. 6-3 243 isn't going to get it done unless you have a ridiculous ability to break tackles or get open like a WR.

@HeHateMe

 

[MDB111™]

Brock Bowers is the next N'Keal Harry. He's too big to be a WR and too small to be an effective TE. 6-3 243 isn't going to get it done unless you have a ridiculous ability to break tackles or get open like a WR.

You don't know what you are talking about though?

 

[Dead man walking]

I think Coal would literally become a diamond under that pressure.

Literally!

 

[HeHateMe]

Brock Bowers is the next N'Keal Harry. He's too big to be a WR and too small to be an effective TE. 6-3 243 isn't going to get it done unless you have a ridiculous ability to break tackles or get open like a WR.

 

[DanielCCSBears]

I truly enjoy how your hatred for Cole Kmet has quietly manifested itself into this ridiculous adoration of Brock Bowers though.

 

[HeHateMe]

I truly enjoy how your hatred for Cole Kmet has quietly manifested itself into this ridiculous adoration of Brock Bowers though.

I don't h8 Kmet though

 

[Washington]

I personally think Kmet is a good TE and I can just imagine what he might do with good QB play. I don't see any correlation between getting Bowers and how that would improve Kmet but I know this thread is a troll thread.

I like Bowers but I would only take him at 9 if the other top 3 WRs and Alt are off the board. I don't get the talk from Daniel about him being undersized. He "literally" has damn near the same metrics as Kittle and I surely doubt people would pass on Kittle. Bowers was highly productive in college playing against great competition and I feel confident that will translate to the pros.

 

[msadows]

Cole can go back to his natural position of 3rd offensive tackle

 

[Nelly]

Brock Bowers is the next N'Keal Harry. He's too big to be a WR and too small to be an effective TE. 6-3 243 isn't going to get it done unless you have a ridiculous ability to break tackles or get open like a WR.

George Kittle was 6'4" 247 coming out of Iowa and had transitioned to TE from WR before that.

 

[DanielCCSBears]

I personally think Kmet is a good TE and I can just imagine what he might do with good QB play. I don't see any correlation between getting Bowers and how that would improve Kmet but I know this thread is a troll thread.

I like Bowers but I would only take him at 9 if the other top 3 WRs and Alt are off the board. I don't get the talk from Daniel about him being undersized. He "literally" has damn near the same metrics as Kittle and I surely doubt people would pass on Kittle. Bowers was highly productive in college playing against great competition and I feel confident that will translate to the pros.

George Kittle has played a full season only once some Bears fans might call him injury prone but since he isn't on the Bears it's not a problem.

 

[msadows]

George Kittle was 6'4" 247 coming out of Iowa and had transitioned to TE from WR before that.

Dont tell daniel about any of this shit, his brane can only handle one thought process at a time.

If he wasn't a goober, he'd notice that the top 2 TE's drafted last year were both the same size as bowers, and had very good rookie seasons.

 

[msadows]

George Kittle has played a full season only once some Bears fans might call him injury prone but since he isn't on the Bears it's not a problem.

Shannon Sharpe is gonna have to relinquish his gold jacket because your fat short ass says so, right?

 

[msadows]

Evan Engram also comes to mind. Seems to be working fine for him in the NFL.

But I guess Daniel is the genius, and the actual results dont matter, only what goes through daniels cheeto brane.

 

[Marley's Liberality]

I get the feeling Cole has peaked as far as his development. He may get more or less passes thrown to him moving ahead but I think he is going to be the same player. I'm satisfied with a good but not great TE from where we drafted him. He's top 10 at his position and could start for most teams.