Marquess Wilson still in the mix at wide receiver

Status
Not open for further replies.

PAPABEAR77

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
3,575
Liked Posts:
1,007
Location:
texas
This can't be a serious topic.

Wilson be #3 over Eddie Royal?

A battle?

Because of some filler quotes during the offseason?

M Wilson over Eddie Royal?

Wtf lol
right a third year 7th round pick that has never started vs a proven slot receiver that has been to the pro bowl

the winner is .........
 

Desperado34

New member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
17,933
Liked Posts:
6,889
Location:
Illinois
right a third year 7th round pick that has never started vs a proven slot receiver that has been to the pro bowl

the winner is .........

Bahha.

Dude...


Potential.

And he was rated high on Mel kipers board!!!.
 

HeHateMe

He/Himz/Hiz
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
60,622
Liked Posts:
53,892
This can't be a serious topic.

Wilson be #3 over Eddie Royal?

A battle?

Because of some filler quotes during the offseason?

M Wilson over Eddie Royal?

Wtf lol

Watch and Learn.
 

Mongo_76

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2013
Posts:
9,959
Liked Posts:
5,233
right a third year 7th round pick that has never started vs a proven slot receiver that has been to the pro bowl

the winner is .........


What year did Royal make the pro-bowl?

And you may want to check on how many times wilson started.
 

PAPABEAR77

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
3,575
Liked Posts:
1,007
Location:
texas
What year did Royal make the pro-bowl?

And you may want to check on how many times wilson started.
ok when did he start? i don't remember him beating out BM or Jeffery and i thought royal was a probowler his rookie year with BM and cutler in Denver
 

Mongo_76

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2013
Posts:
9,959
Liked Posts:
5,233
ok when did he start? i don't remember him beating out BM or Jeffery and i thought royal was a probowler his rookie year with BM and cutler in Denver

Right.

So look up both and come back.
 

PAPABEAR77

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
3,575
Liked Posts:
1,007
Location:
texas
Right.

So look up both and come back.
right so why do i need to look it up then if he has never started ? and if some reason i forgot he has my point is he does not have near the credentials royal does period there is no comparison the bears brought royal in for the slot spot.
 

Mongo_76

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2013
Posts:
9,959
Liked Posts:
5,233
right so why do i need to look it up then if he has never started ? and if some reason i forgot he has my point is he does not have near the credentials royal does period there is no comparison the bears brought royal in for the slot spot.

You need to look it up because he has actually started 7 games over the lats 2 seasons.

And when base your argument on statements like "he has never started" when he has, you look dumb.

And when you base your argument on statements like "Royal made the pro-bowl", when he hasn't, you look dumb.

And my guess is you don't want to look dumb.

So, I'm trying to help you out.
 

ruprecht

Bills Board Hall of Famer
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
10,199
Liked Posts:
9,080
Location:
Portland, Oregon
Dark horse for success this year.

#notracist
 

PAPABEAR77

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
3,575
Liked Posts:
1,007
Location:
texas
no you not your just trying to be politically correct he filled in for BM when he was injured and when Jeffery was i think too but if he never beat out either for the starting spots period.

as far as the royal quote i thought he was a probowler his rookie year but i guess i was wrong

if you really wanted to help out you would of came across way different than accusing someone of being dumb

my point is still valid but my stats maybe a little off
 

Mongo_76

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2013
Posts:
9,959
Liked Posts:
5,233
no you not your just trying to be politically correct he filled in for BM when he was injured and when Jeffery was i think too but if he never beat out either for the starting spots period.

as far as the royal quote i thought he was a probowler his rookie year but i guess i was wrong

if you really wanted to help out you would of came across way different than accusing someone of being dumb

my point is still valid but my stats maybe a little off

Politically correct?

Please explain how that applies.

And I didn't call you dumb.

I said I am trying to help you not look dumb.

Don't be upset because I know more about the Bears and am a bigger fan than you. I think we're pulling for the same thing: Wins.
 

Mongo_76

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2013
Posts:
9,959
Liked Posts:
5,233
Out of curiosity, why do you think Royal is so good?

He's been very pedestrian since his rookie year.
 

Desperado34

New member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
17,933
Liked Posts:
6,889
Location:
Illinois
You need to look it up because he has actually started 7 games over the lats 2 seasons.

And when base your argument on statements like "he has never started" when he has, you look dumb.

And when you base your argument on statements like "Royal made the pro-bowl", when he hasn't, you look dumb.

And my guess is you don't want to look dumb.

So, I'm trying to help you out.

No.

What's dumb is someone trying to say that Wilson can start over Eddie Royal.

lol.

That's dumb.
 

Mongo_76

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2013
Posts:
9,959
Liked Posts:
5,233
No.

What's dumb is someone trying to say that Wilson can start over Eddie Royal.

lol.

That's dumb.

I never said that.

Please show me where in this thread that was said by me.

Maybe "dumb" is people who think that because a thread says Wilson is still in the mix, they automatically take a dump him.

Personally, I'd rather invest in seeing what he can do next year and see where he tops out than relying on a guy who is pretty much at or below medicore for his entire career.
 

Desperado34

New member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
17,933
Liked Posts:
6,889
Location:
Illinois
I never said that.

Please show me where in this thread that was said by me.

Maybe "dumb" is people who think that because a thread says Wilson is still in the mix, they automatically take a dump him.

Personally, I'd rather invest in seeing what he can do next year and see where he tops out than relying on a guy who is pretty much at or below medicore for his entire career.

I didn't. Calm down, sir.

Oh and please don't say Eddie Royal is mediocre. He's a fantastic slot receiver and A lot of charger fans were sad to see him go. That's not making sense bro.
 

PAPABEAR77

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
3,575
Liked Posts:
1,007
Location:
texas
Politically correct?

Please explain how that applies.
And I didn't call you dumb.


I said I am trying to help you not look dumb.

Don't be upset because I know more about the Bears and am a bigger fan than you. I think we're pulling for the same thing: Wins.
yep you sure are man not upset i got my stats wrong i admit you did call me dumb as ' YOU LOOK DUMB " in English mean your dumb ..... however a real bears fan wont try to degrade a fellow bears fan for stats but you are right however you are not a bigger bears fan
 

baselman1974

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Sep 26, 2014
Posts:
3,860
Liked Posts:
4,162
Location:
Palos Hills, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Illinois Fighting Illini
With emphasis on running the ball, the Bears don't really need Wilson. How many times Cutler is going to throw the ball in a game, 30-35 times at most? Royal will start as 3rd receiver. He is proven, and Wilson is not.
 

Mongo_76

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2013
Posts:
9,959
Liked Posts:
5,233
I didn't. Calm down, sir.

Oh and please don't say Eddie Royal is mediocre. He's a fantastic slot receiver and A lot of charger fans were sad to see him go. That's not making sense bro.

He's gong to do just fine in the slot.

But he's not a game changer.

Overall, I think most people would say he's an older mediocre slot receiver. His stats back that. He will likely see action on most 3 WR sets.

But, as far as the #3 on the roster? It will likely be Wilson. Wilson is not a slot receiver. He's an X. He will likely be our #3 receiver - similar to how he was used over the last 2 seasons.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top