Matt Garza All-star?

Should Matt Garza be an all-star


  • Total voters
    12
  • Poll closed .

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
It's not an official statistic and it's not a "true" number in that they have to keep fudging the constant to make it look like ERA, but I think it's a more consistent evaluator of individual pitching talent than ERA is. That's what the GMs should be looking at, if they don't have some other, better proprietary metric.

id be willing to bet there is some sweet metric out there that we dont know about
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
FIP assumes that the defense will get to the same number of balls as they do in an average game, but also assume that pitchers aren't consistently giving up rockets that no defender could get to.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
FIP assumes that the defense will get to the same number of balls as they do in an average game, but also assume that pitchers aren't consistently giving up rockets that no defender could get to.

Yeah, that's why in addition to FIP you have to take into account what kinds of balls are being hit off the pitcher. If he's giving up a lot of ground balls and they're just squeaking through, then he's unlucky. If he's giving up tons of fly balls or liners, that's not really unlucky hehehe :D

Garza has been good about shifting his approach to induce groundballs, but he's also been extremely lucky so far in terms of giving up homers. He's also giving up about 23% line drives. He's not as good as his FIP indicates.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
Yeah, that's why in addition to FIP you have to take into account what kinds of balls are being hit off the pitcher. If he's giving up a lot of ground balls and they're just squeaking through, then he's unlucky. If he's giving up tons of fly balls or liners, that's not really unlucky hehehe :D

Garza has been good about shifting his approach to induce groundballs, but he's also been extremely lucky so far in terms of giving up homers. He's also giving up about 23% line drives. He's not as good as his FIP indicates.

bold 1- weather sir, a lot has to do with the shit weather we have had to start the season. its june 23, expect an increase in homeruns from him.

bold 2- exactly right.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
bold 1- weather sir, a lot has to do with the shit weather we have had to start the season. its june 23, expect an increase in homeruns from him.

bold 2- exactly right.

I think he's been pitching at some points with the wind blowing out and didn't give up homers because he kept the ball on the ground, but I don't doubt that weather was an issue.
 

poodski

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 18, 2010
Posts:
3,276
Liked Posts:
680
you obviously havent studied FIP. It seems you look at FIP as fact and at face value. Cool with me. Just remember FIP is not a stat and is not a true number.

You can call it whatever you want. It's way better than ERA and has been PROVEN to be a better indicator of future ERA than even ERA is.

I mean how is that possible. You can say it isn't a "real" number all you want. As crude of a stat as it is, it is still MILES better than ERA.
 
Top