Michael Jordan is out legacy protecting again

Marty Baby

Marty Baby
Joined:
Oct 23, 2010
Posts:
50
Liked Posts:
0
Jordan never played in game 7 of the finals. Yet I have seen him struggle in finals games.


Yes or no question, Hou - YES...or NO.

When teams Jordan main-manned to the Finals, did those teams EVER lose a Finals?

Yes.

Or No.

Of the teams Kobe main-manned to the Finals (that's what...2 or 3 times?), have THOSE teams ever lost a finals?

Yes.

Or No.
 

houheffna

Ignoring Idiots
Joined:
May 6, 2009
Posts:
8,673
Liked Posts:
2,711
I'm sorry but I don't remember attacking you in any way...until I decided to retaliate against some of your attacks


No, I wasn't referring to you in reference to the attack, sir. That was intended for Lefty.

The other one was intended for you though, the one that said you weren't very nice.

Well, I don't get that one either...but then again, you don't know me...so I can't say your opinion of me bothers me.
 

houheffna

Ignoring Idiots
Joined:
May 6, 2009
Posts:
8,673
Liked Posts:
2,711
Yes or no question, Hou - YES...or NO.

When teams Jordan main-manned to the Finals, did those teams EVER lose a Finals?

Yes.

Or No.

Of the teams Kobe main-manned to the Finals (that's what...2 or 3 times?), have THOSE teams ever lost a finals?

Yes.

Or No.

Jordan is 6-0 in the finals...exactly what does that have to do with anything? Kobe is 5-2...

Yes or no question for you...Did Jordan ever struggle in a Finals game? Including the last game of a finals? Yes or No?
 

Marty Baby

Marty Baby
Joined:
Oct 23, 2010
Posts:
50
Liked Posts:
0
Jordan is 6-0 in the finals...exactly what does that have to do with anything? Kobe is 5-2...

How could a guy who lost 2 finals (including the last loss where the team he led lost by 39 in a finals elimination game) even be comparable to a guy who NEVER lost a finals. 5-2 can't ever surpass or be equal to 6 and oh.

Yes or no question for you...Did Jordan ever struggle in a Finals game? Including the last game of a finals? Yes or No?

No, not that I know of. As far as I recall the teams Jordan main-manned never got to Game 7 because Jordan never slacked - he was too busy WINNING the games.
 

Lefty

New member
Joined:
Apr 19, 2010
Posts:
2,241
Liked Posts:
780
:rolleyes: It's really funny that you have yet to grasp how insanely stupid it is to use arbitrary sets of games as the make-or-break of a player's career. I don't understand how people actually can do that stupid shit still. Like, really? Your brain doesn't tell you "gee, it appears that there are only a small number of games off which we are extrapolating meaning and making wide-spread conclusions, perhaps this small sub-set of games is not the best to use"?
 

houheffna

Ignoring Idiots
Joined:
May 6, 2009
Posts:
8,673
Liked Posts:
2,711
No, not that I know of. As far as I recall the teams Jordan main-manned never got to Game 7 because Jordan never slacked - he was too busy WINNING the games.

Do some research on that and get back to me, because you are wrong...and you have the nerve to write it in capital bold letter...hilarious...
 

RamiTheBullsFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
9,505
Liked Posts:
1,733
No, not that I know of. As far as I recall the teams Jordan main-manned never got to Game 7 because Jordan never slacked - he was too busy WINNING the games.

1992 - the NYK took em to 7 in the semi's.

1993 - they went down 0-2 (I might call that "slacking").

1998 - ECF: Indiana took em to 7. Every home team won each game.
 

Marty Baby

Marty Baby
Joined:
Oct 23, 2010
Posts:
50
Liked Posts:
0
The context of that quote and discussion was FINALS Game 7's.

How many has Jordan appeared in?

How many has Jordan lost?

That's what we're talking about.


1992 - the NYK took em to 7 in the semi's.

1993 - they went down 0-2 (I might call that "slacking").

1998 - ECF: Indiana took em to 7. Every home team won each game.
 

Marty Baby

Marty Baby
Joined:
Oct 23, 2010
Posts:
50
Liked Posts:
0
Jordan lost game 7's in the Finals? Jordan lost a finals?

That's wrong?

(confused look):turrible:

Do some research on that and get back to me, because you are wrong...and you have the nerve to write it in capital bold letter...hilarious...
 

houheffna

Ignoring Idiots
Joined:
May 6, 2009
Posts:
8,673
Liked Posts:
2,711
The context of that quote and discussion was FINALS Game 7's.

How many has Jordan appeared in?

How many has Jordan lost?

That's what we're talking about.

Who is "we"...you must have a mouse in your pocket cause you ain't talkin about me...

I asked you a question and you answered it wrong...
 

Marty Baby

Marty Baby
Joined:
Oct 23, 2010
Posts:
50
Liked Posts:
0
Well, you asked for some research in terms of what Jordan did in the Finals (whether or not he ever lost a game 7 or even let his team GET to a game 7 and here's what I found)

1990-1991 Beat the Lakers 4-1 (4+1=5 Games)
1991-1992 Beat the Blazers 4-2 (4+2=6 Games)
1992-1993 Beat the Suns 4-2 (4+2=6 Games)
1995-1996 Beat the Sonics 4-2 (4+2=6 Games)
1996-1997 Beat the Jazz 4-2 (4+2=6 Games)
1997-1998 Beat the Jazz 4-2 (4+2=6 Games)

If I'm wrong (that Jordan never lost a finals and never allowed the teams he main-manned to GET to a game 7) then history is wrong.:nelson:
 

RamiTheBullsFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
9,505
Liked Posts:
1,733
Marty, all I'm saying is that this statement is wrong:

No, not that I know of. As far as I recall the teams Jordan main-manned never got to Game 7 because Jordan never slacked - he was too busy WINNING the games.
 

houheffna

Ignoring Idiots
Joined:
May 6, 2009
Posts:
8,673
Liked Posts:
2,711
Well, you asked for some research in terms of what Jordan did in the Finals (whether or not he ever lost a game 7 or even let his team GET to a game 7 and here's what I found)

1990-1991 Beat the Lakers 4-1 (4+1=5 Games)
1991-1992 Beat the Blazers 4-2 (4+2=6 Games)
1992-1993 Beat the Suns 4-2 (4+2=6 Games)
1995-1996 Beat the Sonics 4-2 (4+2=6 Games)
1996-1997 Beat the Jazz 4-2 (4+2=6 Games)
1997-1998 Beat the Jazz 4-2 (4+2=6 Games)

If I'm wrong (that Jordan never lost a finals and never allowed the teams he main-manned to GET to a game 7) then history is wrong.:nelson:

Dude, find some phonics and get hooked...I didn't ask you that question...who did? You are arguing with yourself...
 

Fred

New member
Joined:
Mar 29, 2009
Posts:
982
Liked Posts:
7
You're just fucking stupid.

I finally got around to reading the responses to my posts in this thread, and this will be my last written communication on this subject. I really don’t have the time, but I somehow feel as though I owe MJ to put this self-righteous puke Lefty in his place. So allow me to momentarily step in the sewer.

Here’s a quick review. You, Lefty, bitched about MJ, called him an “asswipe” because you didn't like his gambling, his HOF speech, etc. I countered with a more moderate assessment of MJ. No one has tried to paint MJ as perfect...obviously, no one is. But I offered positive actions of MJ to counter your argument portraying him as a massive prick, and you ignored them. You’ve chosen to focus only on the negatives, and form an opinion despite never meeting the man. It’s a free country, and you’re free to do so. But I'm free to call you the human turd in the punch bowl. There is good and bad in everyone, & for you to focus only on the negatives while refusing to acknowledge the positives says a lot more about you than any of your critiques say about Michael.

When judging a person to be an “asswipe”, I’d start by analyzing how he or she affected your personal life, in a negative or positive way. I'm not going to get into a discussion of microeconomics with you, because you're obviously too fucking stupid to understand, but it's no coincidence that the city was a toilet in the early 80's, and over the time frame that coincided with MJ playing in Chicago, it became one of the cleanest and most beautiful cities in the country. Daley’s beautification projects were largely funded by some of the highest hotel taxes in the country. During the 90’s, Chicago actually became a tourist destination from November to March, something it never was before, all because people throughout the world were coming to our city to witness the greatest basketball player in history play at the old Chicago Stadium and the UC. The financial impact was massive, and much of the revenue was used to improve the city aesthetics, and we still reap these benefits today. Was MJ the sole reason for city’s improvements? Of course not, but I’d argue he was the most underrated one, and his enormous positive economic impact on Chicago will always be underestimated and in some circles ignored. A French news agency in 1998 reported that Michael Jordan had an impact valued at more than 10 billion dollars on the US economy since he joined the National Basketball Association in 1984. I’d argue that Chicago reaped the benefits more than any other American city. If you reside in Chicago, there is no doubt we’re all better off because MJ played here. We owe him some benefit of the doubt when it comes to labeling him an asswipe. But you’ve chosen to TMZ him because of his personal failings. So let’s address those.

Here are some of your specific critiques:

“He swore on live television”
People swear, especially athletes. I noticed you did throughout the thread when you were beaten in argument after argument.

"and went out of his way to bash people as far back as some jamoke of a coach that cut him in high school?"
He was making a point that he used slights as motivation to get better. A lot of great people turn negatives into a positive. Hopefully you'll use my critiques as motivation to get a life.

"The one where he then went on to bash people from every level of basketball he played since then, during his, you know, Hall of Fame induction speech, essentially making a mockery of the whole night and even lambasting some of the people that were in the audience to honor him?"
I would agree that he could have given a less memorable, boring version that people won't talk about for years to come. Again, the purpose was to show what he used as motivation to become the best ever. Was it a great speech? No, but it didn’t come close to providing enough incentive for me to disrespect him by calling him an asswipe.

"I was laughing my ass off. But that's because I knew there were hundreds of people in attendance (and many more watching at home) that absolutely loved basketball and loved MJ but didn't know he was that much of an absolute prick, and it was funny to think about how and when their brains finally clicked to the fact that the dude is an asswipe."
Actually, trying to diminish a legend like Michael, and making snide comments about those who support him….that's the true definition of an asswipe. Why you get off on trying to bash him is quite pathetic, but not surprising, from an obvious self-loathing **** who has very little to do with his time.

“ For punching Steve Kerr and Will Perdue during practices”
Anyone who has spent time playing competitive basketball knows that these things sometimes happen during the course of competitive practices or games. Michael called Steve immediately afterward and apologized. Then they moved on. This is the kind of thing you would know if you didn’t spend the majority of your life in a hobbit costume. But you used it as another example of how MJ is an “asswipe”.

You criticize MJ for being a womanizer. It’s a failing of great men throughout history, including true heroes like JFK and Martin Luther King. That doesn’t make them “asswipes”. Degenerate gambler? Why is it any of your business what Michael does with his money? It has never effected his perfomanc in games, and his family is obviously still financially secure. Why do you give a shit what MJ does with the money the HE has earned?

He’s been a winner as a father, and he’s failed as a husband. It’s obvious his kids love him, and I think that’s worth something on the grand scale. Overall, he’s behaved quite well under the microscope that is his life. I think it would be naïve to think that anyone could achieve his iconic status without having some redeeming qualities.

I’d could offer several other positive examples of stories from a good friend in the Bulls organization who actually worked with Michael while he was a Bull. I know that he has donated considerable amounts of time and money for the Charitabulls organization, the Boys and Girls Club and the Make A Wish Foundation. A good friend actually spent 4 ½ hours on a golf course caddying for him in 88; MJ was extremely cool and generous with his time and money. These are people I know and trust, and these people have benefited from his generosity and time. I know these accounts are credible, and I value them more than those of a writer with an axe to grind or some jealous NBA teammate.

I understand and respect people’s right to dislike MJ. I respect and acknowledge Hou’s opinion, although I strongly disagree with it. But I find your invective particularly irritating. For all I know, you may have a solid foundation in basketball, someone who dedicated himself to the sport and truly understands the game. Or you could be a talentless, jealous **** who likes to spend hours on Mt. Pious, which ironically is probably located somewhere in your parent's basement. I know you find gambling objectionable, but I’d like to bet on the latter. So allow me to offer the following wager: Thonus, Kush, and several of the guys on this forum like to meet up and play some hoops. We’ll both take 50 3-pointers, college or pro, your choice. I’m sure someone like you, so dedicated to the game of basketball, can teach me, an aging old man well past his prime, a thing or 2 about the important fundamentals of shooting. If you make more than me, I’ll give you 100 bucks and apologize for the insults I have hurled your way in this post. If I make more than you, from that day forward, you'll promise to keep your fucking negative pathetic thoughts on MJ to yourself, and never write another fucking negative word in this or any other Forum about MJ. And I promise not to laugh if you shoot underhand. I doubt you’ll take the bait though…just more writing from a kid with no credibility. If you’re game, email me at chicagobullseye@gmail.com. Otherwise, Good luck in your life. In the future, I encourage you to look for inspiration in achievers instead of trying to tear them down.
 
Last edited:

Lefty

New member
Joined:
Apr 19, 2010
Posts:
2,241
Liked Posts:
780
So you still can't divorce yourself from the "well he did bad things, but he did good things too!!!" mode of valuation? Got it. And what in the wide world of ****-all does my talent in the game of basketball have to do with my thoughts on the game of basketball, specifically regarding the off-court exploits of a single player? Yes your response has been thought-out and is surprisingly well-written, but in the end you just tip your hand as an aged meatball Chicago/MJ-fan that isn't willing (or able) to let the merits of one's points stand for themselves, and thus must resort to criticizing your perception of how good I may or may not be at basketball (I'm alright, got a few low-post moves being 6'4, but people are amiss as to why my jumper, despite looking technically flawless, is questionable in results) and where I reside and what I do for a living. The name-calling is fine (albeit tired and unimaginative ["ZOMGZ MOM'S BASEMENT!!!!"]), I don't have a problem with it, but how in any way does where I live or what I do negatively influence my intelligence or expertise on matters that can be considered abstract for nearly everyone involved? That's just lazy internet arguing.

What's more, your overall utilitarian outlook is laughably skewed considering one of the main underpinnings of your argument against MJ not being a shithead is the economic impact he may or may not have had on the City of Chicago (remember: correlation does not mean causation). If we take that mantra and apply it universally (though this is a Kantean methodology that would make John Stuart Mill roll over in his grave, please do your best to stick with me), then Hitler wasn't such a bad guy, because while there was a lot of death and destruction that came in the wake of his actions, he united Germany under one governmental system, oversaw its rise to global power status (they weren't technically a superpower, as they lacked the ability to project their power to the far-reaches of the globe, but they were certainly more than a regional power), implemented some of the best military strategies the world had seen at the time (some we still use today) and made a lot of people and nations very rich and prosperous for a time. So yeah, while he may have extinguished more than 6 million people just because they believed in a different invisible man than he did, he also did some pretty nice things, so he couldn't be that much of a dick, right?

Reductio ad absurdum aside, your response is littered with straw men and logical fallacies, too many to respond to individually, but I'll correct you on just a few of them for now:

1) My point clearly was not "MJ swore, he's such an asshole!" Clearly it was not that, and taking that meaning away from the context in which the original point was made really just highlights your own ineptitude and bias. Swearing, in general, is not an issue, a mantra that I clearly subscribe to. However, when that swearing occurs during a formal honoring ceremony, that ceremony is being broadcast live to millions of viewers (MJ had to know it was live, just had to), and the person doing the swearing is the honoree, something is definitely wrong. More specifically, something is wrong with the honoree, like, I don't know, being a vindictive asswipe.

2) You are grasping at straws with your "he was just talking about how he used negatives as motivation" spin on is speech. It is clear to anyone with half a brain (OK, so maybe you can't help putting that spin on it) that he was running down his mental checklist of people that he felt wronged him throughout his career. This is evidenced by the "I didn't see the organization out there winning championships, I didn't see the organization out there playing with the flu in Utah" quip following (or preempting, I can't remember exactly) his bashing of a few members of the Bulls front office during his playing days. Which, if all he was doing was recounting times of when he used negative influences as motivation, why then turn it into a boastful rant that minimizes the people from whom he tried to garner strength from? It would seem to me that there would be no need for such minimization if one were truly trying to "turn a negative into a positive", because that minimization effectively squashes the "negative" thus reducing its propensity to be turned into a "positive".

3) You routinely use "legend" or something of that ilk when referring to my "slights" against Jordan (we'll forget for the moment that those things actually happened), as if I am in some way trying to discredit him as a basketball player. That is obviously ludicrous, and just another case of you distorting my points in an effort to make your irrational love of some guy (whom you've also probably never met, and even if you have, what the **** difference does it make?) fit your never-ending defense of him.

What makes this even more interesting is other interpretations of the term "legend" and its counterparts: "legend" used in the sense of "all-around great human being" is a particularly good one, because it 1) contradicts your previous acknowledgment that everyone has flaws and 2) implies that you view MJ as some kind of pseudo-role model. Which, if true, means that your beliefs and preferences and benchmarks concerning morality and human interactions are laughably out of whack, as well as affirming my deduction that you are just some crazed meatball of a fan that got really into basketball when MJ was good, and cannot reconcile your love of MJ--as well as your view of him--with anything that is based firmly in reality.

Oh yeah, and I'm sure that most people on this board, though they may not like me, will have no choice but to admit that I am more than capable (at the very least) of going toe-to-toe with you as far as intelligence goes. And even if you don't feel like asking, check around, my posts speak for themselves.
 

Top