CSF77
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2013
- Posts:
- 18,659
- Liked Posts:
- 2,843
- Location:
- San Diego
I would be foolish to limit a 1st round pick or picks that way. If when your pick comes there is a position player that is a better player than the best pitcher than that's who you take. It's OK to target pitching, it's not Ok to take a lesser player because of some sort of dogmatic approach.
I'm divided on that. One side believes in the best talent on the board because they are also trade weight. That is how I view Allen. The 2nd pick has to be the best arm on the board.
Neither pick will affect the team right now. So they have to go with the "best" talent.
This is not the NBA/NFL where a draft impacts the next year. Not to mention drafts are advanced gambling. Where the magic happens is in development. That is where you take the most talent.
Now I get if they pass on a guy with issues. Or another looks like he will commit to college. It is a gamble for them too and a HS edu limits. A free ride through college is impactful.
So I'm thinking they will pass on players that are question marks even if there is more talent there.