Audis/VWs are horribly expensive to maintain. Buy a car that is inexpensive to maintain, has a proven platform for reliability, and there is no way any lease can compare. These aren't 1980's Audis, or the few years they tried to prove to the Italians not to full out nationalize the Lamborghini brand by pushing out a few excellent drivetrains. I know engineers that work in Ingolstadt for Audi that try to design vehicle components to have a series of failures at certain mileage points, and that's all they do. Because they are scared that the vehicles will not be fit to operate on the autobahn. And this is a very familiar trend across all German cars for the last few decades, despite those specific concerns being disproved, all because it's a great fear-tactic sales pitch. I know, fighting words... for the record, I'm anti-brand loyalty for any major purchase. IDGAF, next week everyone can change how they build cars, and I would just buy the best one, German, Indian, Chinese, who cares.
Side note, I have a long-time friend working in automations at Mercedes, he thinks it's a success that less than whatever 25% of Mercedes over 10 years old remain on our roads. I don't think he understands that we don't have the same selection of budget models they do. Just such a wildly different culture when it comes to cars.
So while I know you're just trolling to waste time. The fact of the matter is, if you compare a reliable platform with low-cost maintenance to an expensive maintenance vehicle with long term reliability issues, then I happen to agree. Leasing an Audi is the only way I would actually pay for driving one, because buying one would be stupid. Being smarter than that, I would just buy a good car instead, put my money into a company that gives a shit about making a car that can be reliable after 20 years, or put on 500k miles without tens of thousands in maintenance.