- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 56,477
- Liked Posts:
- 61,938
What is your source for these "facts" you cited here?
Ps if you start a statement with "this may sound racist" it is likely your statement is indeed, racist.
***NFL TO VOTE*** Offering Teams Draft Compensation For Hiring Minority HCs & GMs
- Thread starter Chief Walking Stick
- Start date
- Status
Ps if you start a statement with "this may sound racist" it is likely your statement is indeed, racist.
- Joined:
- May 18, 2014
- Posts:
- 9,838
- Liked Posts:
- 15,177
- Location:
- murica
Isnt that Jimmy the Greek? Big black + big woman = big black kid
ZOMBIE@CTESPN
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Dec 19, 2012
- Posts:
- 18,086
- Liked Posts:
- 19,967
- Location:
- MICHIGAN
This is from the Alex Jones science for dummies handbook. If they got this from a source and not just speculation you won’t get it cause the source is likely a Fraud. This thread got stupid really fast let’s see these sources lol
- Joined:
- Nov 5, 2012
- Posts:
- 4,300
- Liked Posts:
- 2,527
- Location:
- NJ
My favorite teams
My response to @Noonthirtyjoe was partially satire but my defense of his stance not being racist is sound.
Seriously speaking on slave breeding with no jokes inserted,
it was real and largely unproductive in sustain population growth among slaves.
It was not predominant until after the cotton gin was invented shortly before 1808, then Kentucky became the first (and really only significant) state with a breeding market since the imports were lower all around due to the gin machines operating better at turning a profit.
Frazier in his book The Negro Family, stated that "there were masters who, without any regard for the preferences of their slaves, mated their human chattel as they did their stock."
Ex-slave Maggie Stenhouse remarked, "Durin' slavery there were stockmen. They was weighed and tested. A man would rent the stockman and put him in a room with some young women he wanted to raise children from."
In the book ,The American Slave Coast, the author states that the reproductive worth of "breeding women" was essential to the young country's expansion not just for labor but as merchandise and collateral stemming from a shortage of silver, gold, or sound paper tender. He concludes that slaves and their descendants were used as human savings accounts with newborns serving as interest that functioned as the basis of money and credit in a market premised on the continual expansion of slavery.
Others reject the idea that systematic slave breeding was a major economic concern. They argue that there is very meager evidence for the systematic breeding of slaves for sale in the market in the Upper South during the 19th century.
BUT as always definitions:
They distinguish systematic breeding—the interference in normal sexual patterns by masters with an aim to increase fertility or encourage desirable characteristics—
from pro-natalist policies, the generalized encouragement of large families through a combination of rewards, improved living and working conditions for fertile women and their children, and other policy changes by masters. They point out that the demographic evidence is subject to a number of interpretations.
Their takeaway was that when planters intervened in the private lives of slaves it actually had a negative impact on population growth.
That's what happens when government regulates, am I right? (Ok that was a joke, but only here in the last line)
Seriously speaking on slave breeding with no jokes inserted,
it was real and largely unproductive in sustain population growth among slaves.
It was not predominant until after the cotton gin was invented shortly before 1808, then Kentucky became the first (and really only significant) state with a breeding market since the imports were lower all around due to the gin machines operating better at turning a profit.
Frazier in his book The Negro Family, stated that "there were masters who, without any regard for the preferences of their slaves, mated their human chattel as they did their stock."
Ex-slave Maggie Stenhouse remarked, "Durin' slavery there were stockmen. They was weighed and tested. A man would rent the stockman and put him in a room with some young women he wanted to raise children from."
In the book ,The American Slave Coast, the author states that the reproductive worth of "breeding women" was essential to the young country's expansion not just for labor but as merchandise and collateral stemming from a shortage of silver, gold, or sound paper tender. He concludes that slaves and their descendants were used as human savings accounts with newborns serving as interest that functioned as the basis of money and credit in a market premised on the continual expansion of slavery.
Others reject the idea that systematic slave breeding was a major economic concern. They argue that there is very meager evidence for the systematic breeding of slaves for sale in the market in the Upper South during the 19th century.
BUT as always definitions:
They distinguish systematic breeding—the interference in normal sexual patterns by masters with an aim to increase fertility or encourage desirable characteristics—
from pro-natalist policies, the generalized encouragement of large families through a combination of rewards, improved living and working conditions for fertile women and their children, and other policy changes by masters. They point out that the demographic evidence is subject to a number of interpretations.
Their takeaway was that when planters intervened in the private lives of slaves it actually had a negative impact on population growth.
That's what happens when government regulates, am I right? (Ok that was a joke, but only here in the last line)
- Joined:
- Jun 20, 2010
- Posts:
- 38,462
- Liked Posts:
- 33,209
- Location:
- In the mod forum planning your ban
Noonthirtyjoe
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jul 22, 2013
- Posts:
- 7,422
- Liked Posts:
- 3,568
Some facts are racist. I can't change that. True is true no matter how ugly it may be.
Noonthirtyjoe
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jul 22, 2013
- Posts:
- 7,422
- Liked Posts:
- 3,568
Yes the American black people are infact the biggest world wide. It is the main reason blacks dominate sports. Again not saying this to offend but the truth is the truth.
- Joined:
- Jun 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 44,646
- Liked Posts:
- 39,269
My favorite teams
You must be one of them Charlize Theron African Americans.
- Joined:
- Jun 20, 2010
- Posts:
- 38,462
- Liked Posts:
- 33,209
- Location:
- In the mod forum planning your ban
Nah too dark
- Joined:
- Jun 20, 2010
- Posts:
- 38,462
- Liked Posts:
- 33,209
- Location:
- In the mod forum planning your ban
No they're not lol. Please show proof of this if you may
- Joined:
- Jun 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 44,646
- Liked Posts:
- 39,269
My favorite teams
I'm not even sure she's an African-American anyway...
Alpha Male
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2013
- Posts:
- 3,971
- Liked Posts:
- 1,634
LOL Funny story. I had a friend who was south african and became a US citizen in school. He told me he was going to put african american on college applications to have an easier time getting in. Technically he wasn't wrong.
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 33,394
- Liked Posts:
- 27,874
- Location:
- Any-Town, USA
My favorite teams
LMAO, like Pace wouldn't trade the extra picks to move up one spot and draft subpar white players.
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 12,951
- Liked Posts:
- 15,100
- Location:
- United Club
My favorite teams
Louis Riddick on the proposal (he was runner up for the Giants GM post in 2017):
“Owners can hire who they want to hire. When I interviewed with the New York Giants, I felt it was a fair process. But if these policies are implemented, the first day I walk into the building, I know people with that organization would wonder: Did he get this job because he’s the best man for the job, or did he get it at least in part because it gives us a big break in the draft? On the first day of the job, that team would be undermining its own hire by injecting doubt in the minds of the people who work in the building. Is that how you really want a GM to start off his career?”
FMIA: 'Just Figure It Out, Bro'—How the NFL's Most Challenged Team is Handling Distance Learning Reality
“Owners can hire who they want to hire. When I interviewed with the New York Giants, I felt it was a fair process. But if these policies are implemented, the first day I walk into the building, I know people with that organization would wonder: Did he get this job because he’s the best man for the job, or did he get it at least in part because it gives us a big break in the draft? On the first day of the job, that team would be undermining its own hire by injecting doubt in the minds of the people who work in the building. Is that how you really want a GM to start off his career?”
FMIA: 'Just Figure It Out, Bro'—How the NFL's Most Challenged Team is Handling Distance Learning Reality
- Joined:
- Jun 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 44,646
- Liked Posts:
- 39,269
My favorite teams
He's not wrong about that at all. There's no "technically" about it. I'd say he was the very definition of African-American.
Alpha Male
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2013
- Posts:
- 3,971
- Liked Posts:
- 1,634
Well that is true.
Alpha Male
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2013
- Posts:
- 3,971
- Liked Posts:
- 1,634
Yep. Just like Elizabeth warren was technically a native american with her 1% native american dna
- Joined:
- Jun 20, 2010
- Posts:
- 38,462
- Liked Posts:
- 33,209
- Location:
- In the mod forum planning your ban
Well she's african
- Joined:
- Jun 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 44,646
- Liked Posts:
- 39,269
My favorite teams
I had a geography professor who married a woman from Rhodesia/Zimbabwe (Somebody smarter than me can tell me the difference), and a couple buddies in the class were surprised to find out his wife was white.
- Joined:
- Jun 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 44,646
- Liked Posts:
- 39,269
My favorite teams
I don't know if she became a citizen, is what i mean.
- Status
