**OFFICAIL** Bears 2024 Regular Season News & Schleisse - FTO Preferred - No ALTS! Derailing Is Discouraged!

maxhatter

Well-known member
Joined:
Feb 14, 2020
Posts:
642
Liked Posts:
706
Back to the Chase Young trade discussion; I see both sides of the argument.

I do not think we should give up premium draft picks for him (1st or 2nd round picks). He's played 12 games in the last two seasons with only 1.5 sacks. That is not premium pick production. His DROTY campaign is way in the past and he's had a significant knee injury since then.

I would be comfortable giving up 3rd at most for him at this point, preferably a 4th because I do think we will need a veteran DE in 2024 assuming Fields takes that leap and our window opens.

Yes, we'll most likely have two early picks in the 2024 draft but if we're trying to complete at the highest level in 2024 relying on two rookie DEs to be your primary pass rushers would be a mistake.
The commanders aren't trading him for a 3rd let alone a 4th, at least not before the season starts. And if he can be had for a 3rd or 4th at the trade deadline; I'm not sure the Bears would want him, because that means he's not performing.
 

playthrough2001

Monday Morning QB
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
14,513
Liked Posts:
16,774
Location:
United Club
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Central Florida Knights
  2. TCU Horned Frogs
He should have been on the field enough to keep them from the number one overall pick right.
Actually, wrong…

The games I mentioned, he didn’t participate except for Miami. Also, expecting a WR that’s acquired in-season to be a real difference maker is beyond a stretch.

Your contention is incredibly weak much like your criticism of Fields.
 

DanielCCSBears

Well-known member
Joined:
Jul 7, 2022
Posts:
5,747
Liked Posts:
1,806
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
Actually, wrong…

The games I mentioned, he didn’t participate except for Miami. Also, expecting a WR that’s acquired in-season to be a real difference maker is beyond a stretch.

Your contention is incredibly weak much like your criticism of Fields.

Yes he was injured but the point wasn't mine. The point was if Justin Fields got even a miniscule of help. If we're to believe that Claypool was that help.

I love you backed moved the goalposts. "To expect a WR to come in mid season.". Yeah that was the expectation given by the fucking GM at his press conference.
 

playthrough2001

Monday Morning QB
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
14,513
Liked Posts:
16,774
Location:
United Club
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Central Florida Knights
  2. TCU Horned Frogs
Yes he was injured but the point wasn't mine. The point was if Justin Fields got even a miniscule of help. If we're to believe that Claypool was that help.

I love you backed moved the goalposts. "To expect a WR to come in mid season.". Yeah that was the expectation given by the fucking GM at his press conference.
You suggested Claypool was that help, but he didn’t even participate in the majority of the contests I outlined.

I didn’t move anything, just pointing out a fact that anyone that knows even a bit about how football works would understand.
 

DanielCCSBears

Well-known member
Joined:
Jul 7, 2022
Posts:
5,747
Liked Posts:
1,806
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
You suggested Claypool was that help, but he didn’t even participate in the majority of the contests I outlined.

I didn’t move anything, just pointing out a fact that anyone that knows even a bit about how football works would understand.
You moved the goalposts when you changed the expectation that was not at all related to his injury. It's your words about mid season WR trade which insinuated he would have been of no help regardless of injury. That's sad and pathetic.
 

pdxbearsfan

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 8, 2021
Posts:
5,662
Liked Posts:
2,761
This is where I see Chicago paying more and not getting enough. Right now, without knowing what this team has, it needs to prioritize conserving the draft picks that will carry it into a positive direction. That is not to say that Chicago isn't in need of DE - I want to draft two of them with top picks anyway. And given that my view that draft picks are lottery tickets with different odds (and some ability to improve chances with skillful selections), it should appear that I would be willing to trade draft picks for productive players.

I feel the excitement of this team that makes it appear as though it is poised for a wildcard birth. But while I am very confident in Fields, this team should NOT trade draft picks away until Fields shows that he is certainly the player we all hope for him to be. That doesn't mean that he has to prove it in this season or the team makes a move to a new QB, but it does mean that draft picks for next season should be preserved right now. If Fields looks good enough to pick up the fifth year option, then drafting DE with the picks you would have sent to get Young is still a good investment.
totally agree.
 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
28,055
Liked Posts:
22,994
You couldn't be more wrong if you tried. Everyone on team B is superior to the other guy but one and that's Walter Payton.

Guys! Opportunity to dislike him here. He's saying someone is wrong for their opinion!

Edit: disliked AND reported. Please try to be more civil next time!
 

playthrough2001

Monday Morning QB
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
14,513
Liked Posts:
16,774
Location:
United Club
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Central Florida Knights
  2. TCU Horned Frogs
You moved the goalposts when you changed the expectation that was not at all related to his injury. It's your words about mid season WR trade which insinuated he would have been of no help regardless of injury. That's sad and pathetic.
You’re trying super hard not to be perceived as a complete idiot but you’re failing miserably.

It’s about time for you to write another poorly conceived article that nobody is going to read.

So **** right off…
 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
28,055
Liked Posts:
22,994
You’re trying super hard not to be perceived as a complete idiot but you’re failing miserably.

It’s about time for you to write another poorly conceived article that nobody is going to read.

So **** right off…

He's just trolling because its all he can do on here now. IT's clearly an AE, and if not this dude is a sad individual acting this way while trying to represent CCS.

Option #A is clearly better, because as others have mentioned Cutler already played with all those dudes besides DJ Moore and it wasn't anything great.

Doesn't take a football genius to realize if you have arguably the best running QB and best runningback in NFL history you will score points a LOT. It might not appeal to the rednecks who think a QB should sit in the pocket and throw 50 times tho.
 

Top