**OFFICAIL** Bears Regular Season News & Schleisse - FTO Preferred - No ALTS! Derailing Is Discouraged!

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
32,867
Liked Posts:
19,232
Britbuffguy said:
It's not like Sanborn is this star so many people here think he is.
Click to expand...
Thank you!

Like Jones, I am happy with his play for the price paid. But to think it's a position we shouldn't upgrade is, well....nuts.

And it's not like Sanborn is being cut. He'll still play.
 
remydat

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
58,105
Liked Posts:
38,135
Edmunds is actually who I wanted the Bears to draft back in 2018 over Quan as felt Quan was too small to play ILB and would get swallowed up by blockers. So it seems we have come full circle and now Edmunds is a Bear.
 
The Big Grabowski

The Big Grabowski

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2010
Posts:
1,764
Liked Posts:
2,228
Location:
Austin
remydat said:
He wouldn't have been either way with Brisker, Jackon, Johnson and Edwards. Just think he and Edwards would have been fine but not like I absolutely hate this and more than likely there were be injuries so having 3 good LBs isn't a bad idea. I just would have allocated the resources differently but oh well.
Click to expand...
The Colts were always grooming linebackers, so I'm not surprised to see Flus viewing Sanborn as a depth / developmental piece and loading up with guys who can play.
 
RiDLer80

RiDLer80

First time, long time.
Joined:
Feb 16, 2014
Posts:
3,856
Liked Posts:
3,427
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Miami Hurricanes
  2. Northern Illinois Huskies
Lol at spending all this money on off the ball LBs.

Somebody tell our meathead coach this isn't the early 2000s. Off ball LBs don't win you games.

KC just won it all with two second round LBs on their rookie contract.
 
remydat

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
58,105
Liked Posts:
38,135
The Big Grabowski said:
The Colts were always grooming linebackers, so I'm not surprised to see Flus viewing Sanborn as a depth / developmental piece and loading up with guys who can play.
Click to expand...

Yeah like I said, I don't hate it just not a huge fan. Although I do prefer he spend money on actual good players rather than spending on lesser players just because of need.

I wonder too if he got Edwards at such a good price that he he felt he could get Edmunds. If he had budgeted say 25m for LB then Edwards so cheap made this possible.
 
Rise

Rise

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
8,128
Liked Posts:
8,206
Location:
Mom's Basement
Same old Bears focusing on fucking linebackers. Very disappointed in this signing. The first one made sense, not this overpay like it’s a premium position.
 
Novoitus

Novoitus

Mitch Trubisky Fan
Joined:
Sep 14, 2012
Posts:
3,525
Liked Posts:
3,138
RiDLer80 said:
Lol at spending all this money on off the ball LBs.

Somebody tell our meathead coach this isn't the early 2000s. Off ball LBs don't win you games.

KC just won it all with two second round LBs on their rookie contract.
Click to expand...

drafting someone in the 2nd round is a pretty big investment. i'm not sure i get what you're trying to say here, fella???
 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
32,867
Liked Posts:
19,232
remydat said:
He wouldn't have been either way with Brisker, Jackon, Johnson and Edwards. Just think he and Edwards would have been fine but not like I absolutely hate this and more than likely there were be injuries so having 3 good LBs isn't a bad idea. I just would have allocated the resources differently but oh well.
Click to expand...
OK, but I guess I don't fit into the "improve the team but don't mess with Borom or Sanborn" crowd.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

10,884members
93,297threads
4,387,805posts
110online users

Members online NOW

  • Member
  • Admin
  • Mod
  • Donor
  • HOF
Total: 110 (members: 4, guests: 106)
Top