dennehy
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Dec 29, 2015
- Posts:
- 11,543
- Liked Posts:
- 12,598
- Location:
- Jewels to get a case of Squirt
I expect more from my readers.Green font….
I expect more from my readers.Green font….
They're not sold on Mills. And have nobody behind him.Texans?
He's always been better against the run over getting sacks. not worth the money he gets paid. Poles will sign him.Clowney could’ve had a Peppers esque career. He’s never even gotten 10 sacks in a season.
You gonna be good with paying him somewhere around $17/$20 mil per in 4-5 years? If he's as good as we think he'll be then he's gonna get paid.I agree with him. I wouldn’t draft him in the top half of the first, but could see the logic if they traded down with a team for 2 1sts and used the second one on Robinson.
He’s the most complete back I’ve seen in a while, and probably would be the best pass-catcher on the team.
Arguing that they should not use a 1st round pick on a rb is one thing. But Robinson would undeniably be the biggest weapon for Fields out of all the other prospects, imo
It's the Pooka for me
So i see you say that there's no OL worth OUR pick, so you saying there's no OL worthy of the 2nd pick in the draft or the entire 1st round?I am exactly saying there’s no, absolutely no, none, zip, nada, todos nada, OL worth our first round pick(s?) in this year. None. Not a single fucking one.
As far as second goes, the value at DL for projected second rounders is a much better correlative than OL. It’s a shitty draft for OL, unless you want a G or C in the second, and, for that positional value, I’d rather draft a UTE, WR, or DL. Shit, I’d rather draft Brian Branch in the 2nd, where he’s projected to go, than the OL projected to be there.
Underrated movie but that QB was nowhere near as good as Johnny Utah
They have the #2 pickThey're not sold on Mills. And have nobody behind him.
And? If they want to secure their QB they trade with us to get the #1 pick. They should worry we'll trade out of there. NOW< if they don't care what QB they get, sure, they can stand at #2 and take whoever. I'm just saying they need a QB, and there are 5-8 teams that do.They have the #2 pick
Please re-read your original post and tell me the point you were making. Because you specifically mentioned teams further down needing to trade up, then lumped the Texans with a bunch of teams further down in the draft. I get you saw they have a pick in the teens and forgot they also pick #2And? If they want to secure their QB they trade with us to get the #1 pick. They should worry we'll trade out of there. NOW< if they don't care what QB they get, sure, they can stand at #2 and take whoever. I'm just saying they need a QB, and there are 5-8 teams that do.
Robinson would immediately be the best slot receiver on the team, and probably the best route runner other than Mooney. He is going to be a matchup nightmare wherever ever he goes.
Another note, if Bengals lose to Baltimore, the Bengals will still win the division but will have a coin flip for home field advantage with them if they are the 3 - 6 matchup. Bengals are pissed about thatNot sure if this goes here, but the NFL said that there would be a neutral field AFC championship game (I think if the canceled game comes into play for home field advantage, which it could).
A great solution to a unique problem imo.