***OFFICAL*** Bears GM/Coaching Search News Thread

[clenbuterol_clint]

Do you mind telling us how many games the Bears will win next year? And in 2023?

i have no idea. what i do know is that it won't be largely predicated on whether or not the Bear's new GM decides to send the 39th pick off for the 41st and 108th pick. are you ok?

 

[Tillman33]

i have no idea. what i do know is that it won't be largely predicated on whether or not the Bear's new GM decides to send the 39th pick off for the 41st and 108th pick. are you ok?

I am perfectly fine, at least I can read above a 5th grade level, you bitter dunce. When did I say the Bears should trade back only 2 spots?

 

[ThatGuyRyan]

i have no idea. what i do know is that it won't be largely predicated on whether or not the Bear's new GM decides to send the 39th pick off for the 41st and 108th pick. are you ok?

FTR I would be ok with that trade

 

[clenbuterol_clint]

I am perfectly fine, at least I can read above a 5th grade level, you bitter dunce. When did I say the Bears should trade back only 2 spots?

so you have ignored the logic of the conversation and keyed in on my hypothetical example of your hypothetical situation........... should i edit it to your specifications so we can get back to how you prove that trading back in the draft is somehow a sure fire measure of success for GMs?

 

[Tillman33]

so you have ignored the logic of the conversation and keyed in on my hypothetical example of your hypothetical situation........... should i edit it to your specifications so we can get back to how you prove that trading back in the draft is somehow a sure fire measure of success for GMs?

“I’ll know right away the guy is a keeper and brings a fresh perspective to this organization” is what I said

Premise: fresh perspective
Conclusion: is a keeper

if you actually understood logic, you’d recognize that “is a keeper” and “sure fire” are not the same thing.

if you actually understood logic, you’d realize that a team with 0 talent should trade for more assets.

Checkmate, I win you lose

 

[Tillman33]

FTR I would be ok with that trade

he can’t understand the logic of a crappy team trading back for more assets.

 

[BaBaBlacksheep]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1481715670261903364

 

[clenbuterol_clint]

“I’ll know right away the guy is a keeper and brings a fresh perspective to this organization” is what I said

Premise: fresh perspective
Conclusion: is a keeper

if you actually understood logic, you’d recognize that “is a keeper” and “sure fire” are not the same thing.

if you actually understood logic, you’d realize that a team with 0 talent should trade for more assets.

Checkmate, I win you lose

"is a keeper" is indicative of the fact that you made the correct hiring decision (keeping a person around at their job) based on a single action (trading down) which literally any human on the planet could do. it was a stupid premise from the time you posted it, it remains stupid now. that was my point. your post was stupid.

 

[Tillman33]

"is a keeper" is indicative of the fact that you made the correct hiring decision (keeping a person around at their job) based on a single action (trading down) which literally any human on the planet could do. it was a stupid premise from the time you posted it, it remains stupid now. that was my point. your post was stupid.

Being a keeper means the person has shown enough to have sufficient time/opportunity/should be kept to lead the front office and see where it goes. “Sure fire” indicates a future state of guaranteed success.

I’m expressing an opinion that the GM would be a keeper because it aligns to my vision of how I’d want the team to be built. I’m not guaranteeing it’ll work but it’s a new approach that the Bears haven’t tried in a decade + but good teams do every year. What’s so difficult to understand here lol

if you think it’s stupid it’s fine, we all have different opinions, even though my opinion is better

 

[clenbuterol_clint]

Being a keeper means the person has shown enough to have sufficient time/opportunity/should be kept to lead the front office. “Sure fire” indicates a future state of guaranteed success.

ok guys hire me for 7 million dollars a year. i promise the first year i will trade down any and all assets i have so that Tillman33 gives me the thumbs up for "sufficient time/opportunity/should be kept to lead the front office for the next 4 seasons." by the time it is said and done i can guarantee we will acquire over 100 7th rounders

 

[Tillman33]

ok guys hire me for 7 million dollars a year. i promise the first year i will trade down any and all assets i have so that Tillman33 gives me the thumbs up for "sufficient time/opportunity/should be kept to lead the front office for the next 4 seasons." by the time it is said and done i can guarantee we will acquire over 100 7th rounders

fallacy #1 - “any and all”
fallacy #2 - “first year”
fallacy #3 - “7th rounders”

You clearly don’t understand logic, quit while you’re behind bro

 

[BaBaBlacksheep]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1481720097068789760

 

[JesusHalasChrist]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1481720097068789760

Lovie is available!

 

[JoJoBoxer]

You have a better probability for winning the Powerball or having a 3 way with two porn stars without paying them than the McCrapskeys firing Lyin Ryan.

So you are going to get the two porn stars!

Sadly, it is going to be George who is going to choose the porn stars for you.

Expect Ron Jeremy and someone from *** pornos.

 

[clenbuterol_clint]

fallacy #1 - “any and all”
fallacy #2 - “first year”
fallacy #3 - “7th rounders”

You clearly don’t understand logic, quit while you’re behind bro

holy christ you are dumb. we have exchanged like 5 replies so far and you still don't even understand idgaf if the new GM trades down, the idea that he is accepted as a keeper for simply trading down was a stupid thing to say. now im realizing this wasn't a one off failure

 

[ThatGuyRyan]

Lovie is available!

That defense played ok this year actually, up from 30th to 22nd

 

[JesusHalasChrist]

Hmmm. I'm pretty sure Jerry Angelo is still alive. He has a better record (95-81) than Rick Smith (92-100) and Jeff Ireland (46-50).

Let's get the band back together!

GM: Angelo
HC: Lovie
OC: Rex
OL Assistant's Assistant: Olin Kreutz ($15.01)
DC: Briggs
STC: Hester

 

[wazzupi]

I hope we keep our draft expert(s) if we hire Ed dobbs or Rick smith because I looked up the drafts of those teams(most of our potential gms) and honestly Rick smith has the best track record but none of them drafted as well as we did late rounds so I think a combination will do well for us.

 

[ZOMBIE@CTESPN]

I hope we keep our draft expert(s) if we hire Ed dobbs or Rick smith because I looked up the drafts of those teams(most of our potential gms) and honestly Rick smith has the best track record but none of them drafted as well as we did late rounds so I think a combination will do well for us.

Maybe that’s because they didn’t have to depend on those players except for special teams ?‍

 

[wazzupi]

Maybe that’s because they didn’t have to depend on those players except for special teams ?‍

That makes no sense please delete your post before you embarrass yourself.