Official NFL Draft Thread - Bear Fans Only - and No Montucky!

DefNextYear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2024
Posts:
3,681
Liked Posts:
3,536
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
He uses terrible terminology. He refers to teams “moving back in the first round”. Moving BACK sounds like trading down, But he means moving back INTO the first round by trading up, does he not?
I think the terminology is weird, but I think he does mean to move back cause I can't see why some of those teams want to trade back into the first round. The Vikings don't even have a 2nd round pick, so getting back into the 1st again would be insane. They'd have to give up a future 1st at minimum plus probably their 3rd and a bit more.
 

DefNextYear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2024
Posts:
3,681
Liked Posts:
3,536
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
If Bears land Jeanty, Graham, or even take Grant at 10 I wouldn't be upset if they package both 39 and 41 to move back into 1st to nab someone like Conerly Jr.
I might be on the same page, but there's a big part of me that really wants to be patient here. If the Bears can't land that LT without reaching... find a dude they truly love, I think it just have to come next year. I'd trade up next year if needed. It feels like there's bad value in moving from 39/41 to the late 1st this year given the grades are so equal. I get we want/need a LT though. It's an interesting spot to be in.
 

DefNextYear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2024
Posts:
3,681
Liked Posts:
3,536
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
I mean they're both already projected by some to go pretty damn high with Mykel having been projected to the Bears by some.
Based on McShay's latest video, I think he'll be off the board by the time the Bears pick. It feels like there's enough there to bet on him being a pick from 6-9.
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
37,364
Liked Posts:
11,888
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
If Bears land Jeanty, Graham, or even take Grant at 10 I wouldn't be upset if they package both 39 and 41 to move back into 1st to nab someone like Conerly Jr.
Fuk that, i'm still hoping for a trade down. If not with the 10th pick then with one or even both of the 2nd rounders. I just can't stand that huge gap we have between pick #72 and pick #148. I love this 2nd round and the talent that should be there into the 50's.
 

playthrough2001

Monday Morning QB
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
15,373
Liked Posts:
17,992
Location:
United Club
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Central Florida Knights
  2. TCU Horned Frogs
I could see the Bears offering 10 and 41 for 5 and 107 to draft Jeanty. I’m not a fan but if Schefter is right, they have to be thinking about it.
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
37,364
Liked Posts:
11,888
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
I would not find it very funny if they were in love with Braxton.

“He’s back from injury and miraculously now better.“ Ain’t gonna happen
Why would it be miraculous if he was healthy in time to get some TC in and ready to go game 1?
 

hebs

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jan 1, 2013
Posts:
5,635
Liked Posts:
4,523
Does anyone else feel that if they don't draft OT with the first pick, somehow the O-line will STILL be the reason this offense doesn't succeed next year? Like somehow the injury bug will fugg them up and the revolving door at Left Tackle will leave them fumbling with personnel changes early on and it will derail their season? lol
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
37,364
Liked Posts:
11,888
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
Based on McShay's latest video, I think he'll be off the board by the time the Bears pick. It feels like there's enough there to bet on him being a pick from 6-9.
So Mykel gone before pick 10? I really like him so he's one of the guys i'd love to be the pick at 10 and he's only 20 years old.
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
37,364
Liked Posts:
11,888
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
Does anyone else feel that if they don't draft OT with the first pick, somehow the O-line will STILL be the reason this offense doesn't succeed next year? Like somehow the injury bug will fugg them up and the revolving door at Left Tackle will leave them fumbling with personnel changes early on and it will derail their season? lol
Well damn, Happy F-Ing Easter to you to. LOL
 

BaBaBlacksheep

Moderator
Staff member
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
45,471
Liked Posts:
55,070
If Bears land Jeanty, Graham, or even take Grant at 10 I wouldn't be upset if they package both 39 and 41 to move back into 1st to nab someone like Conerly Jr.
I think packaging a second and the third are more likely if they traded back into round one
 

DefNextYear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2024
Posts:
3,681
Liked Posts:
3,536
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
So Mykel gone before pick 10? I really like him so he's one of the guys i'd love to be the pick at 10 and he's only 20 years old.
It's all speculation, so take it for what it's worth. That's what McShay is hearing though. I think he specifically dropped him as a possibility for the Raiders and it makes all the sense in the world given Carroll has historically loaded up early on defense in drafts.

He also mentions the Eagles thing... people have become obsessed with Jeanty cause Saquon and that's the cool thing to do again, but everyone is ignoring the edges. The same hype of "this is how to win a super bowl" by having edges create pressure, and not needing to blitz. I think the mock world has completely overlooked that teams took notice of it and will draft accordingly.

I am guessing two edges go top 9 and probably 4-5 in the top 20. If you count Walker, that's 3 in the top 9 that I'm going to predict. For what it's worth, he's also been told that the Saints will likely want to replace Cam with a guy of similar size. Cam is big, and quite bigger than these guys, but that can only really mean Mykel or Shemar.
 

Discus fish salesman

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2018
Posts:
16,469
Liked Posts:
21,596
It's all speculation, so take it for what it's worth. That's what McShay is hearing though. I think he specifically dropped him as a possibility for the Raiders and it makes all the sense in the world given Carroll has historically loaded up early on defense in drafts.

He also mentions the Eagles thing... people have become obsessed with Jeanty cause Saquon and that's the cool thing to do again, but everyone is ignoring the edges. The same hype of "this is how to win a super bowl" by having edges create pressure, and not needing to blitz. I think the mock world has completely overlooked that teams took notice of it and will draft accordingly.

I am guessing two edges go top 9 and probably 4-5 in the top 20. If you count Walker, that's 3 in the top 9 that I'm going to predict.
He also mentioned NO and that mykel or shemar could be in the cam Jordan mold and learn from him in likely his final year. Mykel to NO has always been an option that made sense but they need everything
 

hester247

Active member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
462
Liked Posts:
160
Location:
Illinois
I might be on the same page, but there's a big part of me that really wants to be patient here. If the Bears can't land that LT without reaching... find a dude they truly love, I think it just have to come next year. I'd trade up next year if needed. It feels like there's bad value in moving from 39/41 to the late 1st this year given the grades are so equal. I get we want/need a LT though. It's an interesting spot to be in.
Is it weird that I think Will Campbell, Kelvin Banks Jr, and Membou all are either RT or guards and none will be good LTs in NFL? I feel like there is maybe 3 LTs in this draft in Josh Simmons, Josh Conerly Jr and Ersery. Out of those 3 I would rule out Josh Simmons due to his injury concerns which is same issue(not same injury) you already have with Braxton Jones in not being ready by preseason. That leaves Conerly Jr and Ersery. Conerly will go early 20s to late 1st and Ersery might get to 39. I cant run risk of not having a LT to start the season hence why I move back into 1st to snag Conerly
 

hester247

Active member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
462
Liked Posts:
160
Location:
Illinois
Fuk that, i'm still hoping for a trade down. If not with the 10th pick then with one or even both of the 2nd rounders. I just can't stand that huge gap we have between pick #72 and pick #148. I love this 2nd round and the talent that should be there into the 50's.
ya all these guys in PFF or PFSN draft simulators who show in 2nd rd will go in 1st...includes : Kenneth Grant, Tyleik Williams, Omerion Hampton, Josh Conerly Jr, Xavier Watts
 

DefNextYear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2024
Posts:
3,681
Liked Posts:
3,536
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
He also mentioned NO and that mykel or shemar could be in the cam Jordan mold and learn from him in likely his final year. Mykel to NO has always been an option that made sense but they need everything
Yea, I threw in a late edit to include that, haha.
 

Top