Official NFL Draft Thread - Bear Fans Only - and No Montucky!

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
40,777
Liked Posts:
38,084
Location:
Cumming
Philly has a rotation, Jalen Carter played 79% of the snaps and 3 other DTs below 50%.
Dexter played 57% of the snaps and they also added Grady Jarrett who played 67% of snaps for Atlanta...
Do you think Dexter will want even less snaps or that the Bears are paying Jarret to play less than 50% of the snaps?

So how do they fit in a #10 pick that will also be in need of at least 50% of the snaps, plus Andrew Billings?
Grady’s snaps will do down as Atlanta had nobody else on that line and Dexter missed time, 2.5 games. He actually played 67% of the snaps and would easily be over 70% if he didn’t miss any games. If they go DT at #10, I’m guessing that the rookie will play about 45% - 50% of the snaps especially considering they might have Dexter at DE a handful of snaps. Billings is probably gone after 2025, so his snap counts will be going down

 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
35,775
Liked Posts:
19,746
Fact: The Bears finished 5-12.
Fact: The Bears had no Pro Bowlers in 2024.
CCS: “The Bears have zero star players.”
Also CCS*: “ We cannot draft someone who plays <insert position here> because we already have a starter at that position and if we draft someone, the starter would play fewer snaps.“

Spoiler alert: The goal in the off-season, especially for a team that finished 5-12, is to make moves that result in some starters playing fewer snaps.

That is how you get better.

*Some on CCS. Certainly not all.
 

MikeDitkaPolishSausage

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 12, 2013
Posts:
10,122
Liked Posts:
7,895
Location:
Black Rainbow’s Grandma’s house.
Fact: The Bears finished 5-12.
Fact: The Bears had no Pro Bowlers in 2024.
CCS: “The Bears have zero star players.”
Also CCS*: “ We cannot draft someone who plays <insert position here> because we already have a starter at that position and if we draft someone, the starter would play fewer snaps.“

Spoiler alert: The goal in the off-season, especially for a team that finished 5-12, is to make moves that result in some starters playing fewer snaps.

That is how you get better.

*Some on CCS. Certainly not all.
That’s not a fact considering Jaylon Johnson was selected to the Pro Bowl.
 

Xplosive

*Warning*...^Triggered by Mentioning The Haul...
Joined:
Aug 15, 2013
Posts:
5,637
Liked Posts:
2,990
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
Fact: The Bears finished 5-12.
Fact: The Bears had no Pro Bowlers in 2024.
CCS: “The Bears have zero star players.”
Also CCS*: “ We cannot draft someone who plays <insert position here> because we already have a starter at that position and if we draft someone, the starter would play fewer snaps.“

Spoiler alert: The goal in the off-season, especially for a team that finished 5-12, is to make moves that result in some starters playing fewer snaps.

That is how you get better.

*Some on CCS. Certainly not all.
Dont leave out...
Fact: The Bears sign 3 new starters for OL & 2 new starters for DL
CCS: "The Bears must draft only trench players with their top 2 or 3 draft picks"
 

Luke

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 25, 2016
Posts:
1,984
Liked Posts:
1,793
Dont leave out...
Fact: The Bears sign 3 new starters for OL & 2 new starters for DL
CCS: "The Bears must draft only trench players with their top 2 or 3 draft picks"

IMO, the way the draft appears to be shaping up, I just don't see any trench guys worth taking at 10 but they may take a couple on day 2 though.
Aside from possibly CB, I expect some sort of offensive chess piece for Ben at 10. It's going to be interesting to see how this plays out.
 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
28,710
Liked Posts:
23,671
Fact: The Bears had no Pro Bowlers in 2024.
CCS: “The Bears have zero star players.”
Also CCS*: “ We cannot draft someone who plays <insert position here> because we already have a starter at that position and if we draft someone, the starter would play fewer snaps.“

Spoiler alert: The goal in the off-season, especially for a team that finished 5-12, is to make moves that result in some starters playing fewer snaps.

That is how you get better.

*Some on CCS. Certainly not all.

The bears have a lot of good young players at many positions.

You dont replace developing players you just drafted a few years ago. Only morons dont understand it takes time to develop draft picks.

Dexter is certainly one of those players. He has a very high upside, most DT's take 3-4 years to breakout.
 

playthrough2001

Monday Morning QB
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
15,336
Liked Posts:
17,928
Location:
United Club
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Central Florida Knights
  2. TCU Horned Frogs
I know nothing about this kid, but his highlights are impressive



From the highlights, it is apparent if he’s even he’s leaving.

Also, it was nice to see him making plays outside and from the slot.
 

oso4lyf

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 13, 2021
Posts:
1,356
Liked Posts:
1,405
Location:
Cooper City, FL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Miami Hurricanes
It's weird that this draft has players all over the place that seem like they will get people fired by either being a bust, problematic, disciplinary.

Much better to have had last years top 3 than this year.
 

--CyBear--

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 6, 2025
Posts:
1,002
Liked Posts:
669
Location:
Hoffman Estates
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Philly has a rotation, Jalen Carter played 79% of the snaps and 3 other DTs below 50%.
Dexter played 57% of the snaps and they also added Grady Jarrett who played 67% of snaps for Atlanta...
Do you think Dexter will want even less snaps or that the Bears are paying Jarret to play less than 50% of the snaps?

So how do they fit in a #10 pick that will also be in need of at least 50% of the snaps, plus Andrew Billings?
You can get all 3 out there with Jarrett at end. You've just described a top 3 defensive line that controlled the SB like that's the wrong way to do it. Look, I'm not advocating here but there's absolutely no problem with them taking DL early. I don't think they take OL in 1 for similar reasons. They're full up there but those guys don't rotate. It will only have to do with how they feel about their LT situation but I think they're still high on last year's 3rd rounder. They should draft OL at some point to develop.

They could easily take a guy like Nolen if they feel ok about his character or a guy like Coleston because he's got a lot of special to his game and represents some contrast to Kmet. Teams don't care where these guys are projected in mock drafts. I suspect they'd be looking for a small trade down in that situation but that's not always available. I'd prefer they wait on RB until at least round 2 but won't hate on things until I have a better feel for the overall plan.
 
Last edited:

Xplosive

*Warning*...^Triggered by Mentioning The Haul...
Joined:
Aug 15, 2013
Posts:
5,637
Liked Posts:
2,990
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
I know nothing about this kid, but his highlights are impressive

Good stuff... I hope they find another WR in the draft, although they have brought in so many new guys I have to wonder if they will
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
40,777
Liked Posts:
38,084
Location:
Cumming
You can get all 3 out there with Jarrett at end. You've just described a top 3 defensive line that controlled the SB like that's the wrong way to do it.
Billings is likely gone after this year and Jarret is gone after 26. So developing a DT at 10 (or at 39/later) is definitely in the plaan
 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
28,710
Liked Posts:
23,671
Billings is likely gone after this year and Jarret is gone after 26. So developing a DT at 10 (or at 39/later) is definitely in the plaan

DT would make sense, since jarret and dexter can play DE on at times.

De would probably make more sense, but a guy like mason graham would be a home run at #10. Him and dexter next to each other would make a great duo for the next few years
 

Top