Official NFL Draft Thread - Bear Fans Only - and No Montucky!

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
40,903
Liked Posts:
38,208
Location:
Cumming
I’m not sure halve the people on this forum can climb the stairs to leave their mom’s basement
Sorry but my mom’s trailer doesn’t have a basement. Just a porch, a hot tub that doesn’t work and a satellite dish
 

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
Joined:
Mar 17, 2014
Posts:
14,700
Liked Posts:
10,514
Yea maybe. I guess it comes down to who is there at 10 and how much they value that player. Unless it's some particularly special player, it's probably hard to get much value beyond the trade charts. Take the Fields trade as an example. The Bears gave up 20, a 5th, future 1st, and a future 4th for a QB that slipped a bit farther than expected. QBs make sense given the premium of the position.

In this case, asking for more than 2 1sts and 2 3rds is aiming high without a pretty surprising player being there at 10. It would need to be a blue chip at a pretty important position. There is a difference in value between 11 to 20 and 10 to 26, but that's equal to about a 3rd round pick. The rest of the trade was a current 5th and future 4th, which would be considerably less value than a current 3rd. So, I don't think asking for the moon would work. And again, the player would have to be so special that they feel the trade has to be for the 10 spot instead of maybe something a little lower.

I’m not saying it’ll happen, just that is the type of package I’d need to move down that far and the price LA would have to pay for not having a 2nd rounder to offer. Those 3rds are fine, but not remotely enticing enough to move down 16 spots in the 1st.
 

playthrough2001

Monday Morning QB
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
15,392
Liked Posts:
18,036
Location:
United Club
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Central Florida Knights
  2. TCU Horned Frogs
Will Johnson’s three best draft fits from The Draft Network.

“Chicago Bears

Johnson’s fit in Chicago’s defensive architecture is intriguing because of his adaptability. The Bears have Jaylon Johnson, Kyler Gordon, and Tyrique Stevenson in place, though you don’t avoid drafting a talent like Johnson simply because of the presence of those players—Johnson has the potential to be better than all of them, and quickly.

His ability to break on passes, anticipate route combinations, and bait quarterbacks into mistakes would be a natural transition into Dennis Allen’s system. His length would also allow him to excel in Cover 3, where he can use his size to wall off deep routes while keeping vision on the quarterback to break on underneath throws.

The Bears also value corners who can be physical in run support, another trait that Johnson checks off as a willing tackler who understands leverage and does not shy away from contact. With the emergence of Gordon in the slot, along with Johnson and Stevenson as young, physical, perimeter defenders, adding the former Wolverine in Johnson would showcase one of football’s top young secondaries.”

 

bufordht

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
1,586
Liked Posts:
1,408
Location:
Home
Will Johnson’s three best draft fits from The Draft Network.

“Chicago Bears

Johnson’s fit in Chicago’s defensive architecture is intriguing because of his adaptability. The Bears have Jaylon Johnson, Kyler Gordon, and Tyrique Stevenson in place, though you don’t avoid drafting a talent like Johnson simply because of the presence of those players—Johnson has the potential to be better than all of them, and quickly.

His ability to break on passes, anticipate route combinations, and bait quarterbacks into mistakes would be a natural transition into Dennis Allen’s system. His length would also allow him to excel in Cover 3, where he can use his size to wall off deep routes while keeping vision on the quarterback to break on underneath throws.

The Bears also value corners who can be physical in run support, another trait that Johnson checks off as a willing tackler who understands leverage and does not shy away from contact. With the emergence of Gordon in the slot, along with Johnson and Stevenson as young, physical, perimeter defenders, adding the former Wolverine in Johnson would showcase one of football’s top young secondaries.”


Is he more valuable as trade bait for a trade down tho?

Possibly, time will tell.
 

DB012031

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 15, 2019
Posts:
941
Liked Posts:
936
Taking another in line TE at 10 that's going to need a year to hit his learning curve, when the Bears already have an in line TE.

The Bears need a true FLEX TE not another long and lumbering in line like Warren or Loveland.

I would rather have Arroyo or Gadsden who are both the perfect fits for the FLEX and both will be available well after round 1.

This is the one downside of real standout prospects like Arron Donald, or Brock Bowers. Now every time a first round collegiate prospect with big numbers hits the draft, soyjacks everywhere scream that that TE or DT is the next Bowers or Donald.

Warren is no Brock Bowers, not even close.

Did you even watch Warren or Loveland this past season? Loveland is anything but an inline TE. He was split wide on most snaps as he was an average blocker at best. Warren was used all over the field including at QB in the wildcat formation. Both of these guys are very athletic TE's.

Yes, neither has the straight-line speed of Bowers (Bowers was a 4.53 while Warren and Loveland are in the 4.6 range) but to say either is long and lumbering is disingenuous at best.
 

PrimeTime

Knowledge Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
1,757
Liked Posts:
1,246
If Will Campbell makes it to 7 I think the Bears will move up to get him if they can. That would complete the offensive line transformation. I wouldn't have a problem if they did it.
 

DefNextYear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2024
Posts:
3,728
Liked Posts:
3,585
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
If Will Campbell makes it to 7 I think the Bears will move up to get him if they can. That would complete the offensive line transformation. I wouldn't have a problem if they did it.
I think that 7-9 range is where Sanders will go and that may mean a couple teams will be interested in a move.
 

playthrough2001

Monday Morning QB
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
15,392
Liked Posts:
18,036
Location:
United Club
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Central Florida Knights
  2. TCU Horned Frogs
Is he more valuable as trade bait for a trade down tho?

Possibly, time will tell.

If the Bears agreed with the assessment that Will Johnson could quickly be better than any DB they currently have on the roster, that would be a pretty strong incentive to just draft him and be happy.

A trade back in this draft, makes a ton of sense too.
 

BearDown104

Bears Guru
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
2,615
Liked Posts:
2,322
Of all the players I’ve heard mentioned at 10, this would lead me to ripping it.
 

Payton!34

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
2,583
Liked Posts:
1,322
I’d take Tyler Warren if graham and carter aren’t available which they won’t be!

I personally believe that very good tight ends with athleticism can be easier to implement and are more difficult on defenses.

An athletic tight end has way more advantage over linebackers than most wr’s do vs corners, as a whole.

I think the mismatches are much greater with TE’s over CB’s and LB’s for different reasons- one is size and strength vs cb’s and they’re faster than most lb’.

The difference is greater than best wr against their best cb. Love to see a brick bowers type.

I think,Carter, graham, hunter and warren are can’t miss. Not sure about others, as much as I like Jeanty- I’m not sure top ten is the place to draft a rb. He is great though.
 

BaBaBlacksheep

Moderator
Staff member
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
45,505
Liked Posts:
55,134
Unfortunately, if we want a OT, it has to be at 10. There's nothing at OT in this draft.

Been reading a little bit about the later round tackles. There’s a few. Emphasis on a few. Ozzy Trapillo, Charles Grant, Anthony Belton, Jalen Travis, Myles Hinton. I’m looking forward to The Beast coming out. Dane Brugler does such a good job with his write ups on the middle to late round guys.
 

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
Joined:
Mar 17, 2014
Posts:
14,700
Liked Posts:
10,514
Trapillo is my favorite of the group
 

Top