Official NFL Draft Thread - Bear Fans Only - and No Montucky!

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
35,805
Liked Posts:
19,775
The OL isn’t finished. Not by a long shot. Need a LT. Then you need young guys to develop.
Agreed. But reaching at 10 if it comes to that is not preferable to adding a blue chip player elsewhere if available.
 

BaBaBlacksheep

Moderator
Staff member
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
45,466
Liked Posts:
55,068
They addressed 3 positions on the OL. If they get a LT worth the pick I will be happy and they do need depth but not at 10. You keep talking like they have 4 holes on the OL.

3 holes IMO. Starting LT and 2 interior depth guys.

You guys keep acting like the new RG and center never get hurt.

(And Thuney isn’t extended yet either)
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
37,364
Liked Posts:
11,887
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
For the record, I'm all about building the trenches and am not bought in with Jeanty @10. But I'm not going to whine about it either because if that were to happen, he'd very likely be the best of the rest.
Yeah i'm not gonna get mad at the Bears drafting BPA which would easily be Jeanty if the draft goes the way most think it will.
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
37,364
Liked Posts:
11,887
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
The OL isn’t finished. Not by a long shot. Need a LT. Then you need young guys to develop.
It's pretty damn close, at least for the next couple of years anyway. Just need to keep adding to it in each draft but don't think we have to draft LT at #10.
 

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
Joined:
Mar 17, 2014
Posts:
14,692
Liked Posts:
10,510
Agreed. But reaching at 10 if it comes to that is not preferable to adding a blue chip player elsewhere if available.

The way I look at it is there are only about 7-10 truly elite LTs in the NFL. Those guys just don’t grow on trees. After those 7-10 guys, you have a bunch of league average/slightly above average which is where I’d put Braxton.

Do I think any OT at 10 is going to be in the “truly elite” tier? No…I think youre looking at the Braxton tier. If there was a Joe Alt prospect available, that would be another story, but you can’t will those players into existence just because you want an elite LT. They’re just not there this draft and likely won’t give you an upgrade over your current starter.
 

BaBaBlacksheep

Moderator
Staff member
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
45,466
Liked Posts:
55,068
It's pretty damn close, at least for the next couple of years anyway. Just need to keep adding to it in each draft but don't think we have to draft LT at #10.

Yeah we definitely don’t agree
 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
35,805
Liked Posts:
19,775
Again, no reason for the team to extend pre-draft at positions they may draft.
 

Top