Official NFL Draft Thread - Bear Fans Only - and No Montucky!

playthrough2001

Monday Morning QB
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
15,307
Liked Posts:
17,862
Location:
United Club
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Central Florida Knights
  2. TCU Horned Frogs

Discus fish salesman

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2018
Posts:
16,377
Liked Posts:
21,418
Is that sped up or is he just that manic? If I’m Cunningham, I’d be embarrassed to be passed over for that guy! WTF?!?!
Rams have been one of the best drafting teams in the league. I can see how sticking to the evaluation and not getting caught up in getting to know them and creating personal attachments could be smart
 

DefNextYear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2024
Posts:
3,533
Liked Posts:
3,385
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
One thing to remember is that Allen played with three defensive ends and one defensive tackle in some of his four-down alignments, especially on passing situations. I think another DE is more of a priority than another DT.
Some... sure... pretty much every defense runs Nascar "some" of the time. In 2 of the last 3 years, Allen's top 5 in snaps on the DL has included 3 DTs. Also, those same years, 3 of the top 5 in sacks were not edges. The Bears have 3 young edges (starters average age is 26.5 years old and pay is 40.5 million/year) on the roster and only one young DT. I can't confidently say an edge is a higher priority. Added to that, it's been reported that DT is more of a need.

 

bearsfan1977

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 23, 2016
Posts:
3,802
Liked Posts:
4,098
He played 3 years at LT. Everyone has a bad game here and there. These guys are human.

How did he look in the playoffs?

Wright completely shut down Will Anderson in college his last year at Tennessee.

Will Anderson is still pretty damn good.
I get it. And I’ll admit I probably haven’t seen him play as much as you have. But the times I did catch a Texas game, he looked kind of slow and off balance a lot of times. Sark’s offenses are pretty T friendly. I don’t think they feature a lot of true drop back pass sets (I could be wrong about that). And the plays Banks did have to hold up, he looked kind of plodding out there. Not smooth.

In my opinion, he will have issues defending against pro edge rushers. But again, I haven’t seen him play as much as I’ve seen UGA games.

I hope I’m wrong, especially if the Bears snag him.
 

DefNextYear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2024
Posts:
3,533
Liked Posts:
3,385
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks

I actually really like this answer. Gladstone might be really good even though he looks like a child
To be fair, it's essentially the method he learned with the Rams. He's just taking their methods along with him... The idea is interesting though. I read in the past that you're not required to report if you're within some mileage of the college campus (not sure if that's true). However, if it is, you can plan out some of these and never need to notify that they happened.

As it relates to the Bears, Poles otherwise orchestrating who he plans to pick is not the greatest idea. I would hope maybe this year, he throws a bunch of curve balls related to the 30 visits. Gladstone is right in that spending some hours with guys is an extremely low likelihood of paying off. A lot of people know how to fake it through an interview.
 

Myk

85in25
Joined:
Sep 27, 2010
Posts:
12,719
Liked Posts:
5,274
Well, of course GMs do some "tactical" visits for draft maneuvering purposes. It sucks for draftees, but it's just part of what they've signing up for. Plus, they know a GM may want to grab them in the future based on a good interview.


Using conventional Bear Fan wisdom explain to me how bringing in a top ranked RB who is expected to go to the Raiders is a smokescreen.
We have brought in exactly 1 defensive player that's worthy of our pick. If we're not going offense that would mean that's the defensive player we're getting or we're drafting blind.
Without crunching a bunch of boards I see a lot of defensive players we could've brought in to smokescreen the one that we did bring in. Unless all the offense on our board is gone it's offense with #10. There is no smoke.

I can almost guarantee you Jeanty is on the table.
He might be our 10th option but there's a scenario where The Chicago Bears draft Ashton Jeanty with the 10th pick in the 2025 NFL Draft.
 

playthrough2001

Monday Morning QB
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
15,307
Liked Posts:
17,862
Location:
United Club
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Central Florida Knights
  2. TCU Horned Frogs
Dane Brugler just released a 7 round mock at The Athletic. Here are the results for the NFC North.

Chicago Bears

1 (10). TE Tyler Warren, Penn State
2 (39). RB TreVeyon Henderson, Ohio State
2 (41). OT Aireontae Ersery, OT, Minnesota
3 (72). Edge Jack Sawyer, Ohio State
5 (148). S Jaylen Reed, Penn State
7 (233). LB Cody Lindenberg, Minnesota
7 (240). DT Kyonte Hamilton, Rutgers

Detroit Lions

1 (28). CB Maxwell Hairston, Kentucky
2 (60). Edge JT Tuimoloau, Ohio State
3 (102). OT/G Wyatt Milum, West Virginia
4 (130). LB Jeffrey Bassa, Oregon
6 (196). DT Nazir Stackhouse, Georgia
7 (228). WR Nick Nash, San Jose State
7 (244). S Rayuan Lane III, Navy

Green Bay Packers

1 (23). CB Will Johnson, Michigan
2 (54). DT Darius Alexander, Toledo
3 (87). WR Elic Ayomanor, Stanford
4 (124). Edge Barryn Sorrell, Texas
5 (159). G/C Joe Huber, Wisconsin
6 (198). TE Thomas Fidone II, Nebraska
7 (237). LB Jamon Dumas-Johnson, Kentucky
7 (250). QB Kurtis Rourke, Indiana

Minnesota Vikings

1 (24). CB Jahdae Barron, Texas
3 (97). G Dylan Fairchild, Georgia
5 (139). DT Warren Brinson, Georgia
6 (187). RB Jaydon Blue, Texas

 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
28,676
Liked Posts:
23,638

Yea there has been buzz about him to them since the combine. People in the patriots also said the arm length doesnt scare them off.

I'm guessing thats the pick at 4, which is why the giants need to be dumb and take shadeur at #3. If that happens the pats will be forced to take one of travis hunter/abdul carter. If they pass those guys up for will campbell then the draft will really get effing crazy
 

playthrough2001

Monday Morning QB
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
15,307
Liked Posts:
17,862
Location:
United Club
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Central Florida Knights
  2. TCU Horned Frogs
We have brought in exactly 1 defensive player that's worthy of our pick. If we're not going offense that would mean that's the defensive player we're getting or we're drafting blind.

Please explain how selecting a defensive player that didn’t come in for a top 30 visit is “drafting blind.” I guess scouting at actual games, the East West Shrine, the Senior Bowl, attending the combine, and watching tape doesn’t count.

When Poles and Cunningham jump on a plane and attend a few college games in a day, are they closing their eyes once the ball is kicked off?
 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
28,676
Liked Posts:
23,638
Dane Brugler just released a 7 round mock at The Athletic. Here are the results for the NFC North.

Chicago Bears

1 (10). TE Tyler Warren, Penn State
2 (39). RB TreVeyon Henderson, Ohio State
2 (41). OT Aireontae Ersery, OT, Minnesota
3 (72). Edge Jack Sawyer, Ohio State
5 (148). S Jaylen Reed, Penn State
7 (233). LB Cody Lindenberg, Minnesota
7 (240). DT Kyonte Hamilton, Rutgers

Detroit Lions

1 (28). CB Maxwell Hairston, Kentucky
2 (60). Edge JT Tuimoloau, Ohio State
3 (102). OT/G Wyatt Milum, West Virginia
4 (130). LB Jeffrey Bassa, Oregon
6 (196). DT Nazir Stackhouse, Georgia
7 (228). WR Nick Nash, San Jose State
7 (244). S Rayuan Lane III, Navy

Green Bay Packers

1 (23). CB Will Johnson, Michigan
2 (54). DT Darius Alexander, Toledo
3 (87). WR Elic Ayomanor, Stanford
4 (124). Edge Barryn Sorrell, Texas
5 (159). G/C Joe Huber, Wisconsin
6 (198). TE Thomas Fidone II, Nebraska
7 (237). LB Jamon Dumas-Johnson, Kentucky
7 (250). QB Kurtis Rourke, Indiana

Minnesota Vikings

1 (24). CB Jahdae Barron, Texas
3 (97). G Dylan Fairchild, Georgia
5 (139). DT Warren Brinson, Georgia
6 (187). RB Jaydon Blue, Texas


Man, It would suck to draft a TE who may not even be an improvement from cold cement.

It would suck even more to see the packers get the best cb in the draft at fucking #23, essentially patching one of if not their biggest weakness.

Then they are getting one of my favorite DT's in the 2nd. While the bears reach for another project OT instead who's ceiling is average in the NFL...we already have one of those.

Fantastic draft if you are a packers fan I guess.
 

--CyBear--

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 6, 2025
Posts:
976
Liked Posts:
661
Location:
Hoffman Estates
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Please explain how selecting a defensive player that didn’t come in for a top 30 visit is “drafting blind.” I guess scouting at actual games, the East West Shrine, the Senior Bowl, attending the combine, and watching tape doesn’t count.

When Poles and Cunningham jump on a plane and attend a few college games in a day, are they closing their eyes once the ball is kicked off?
That and you may not bring in a known to try and prevent being jumped for a guy.

It's lying season.
 

DefNextYear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2024
Posts:
3,533
Liked Posts:
3,385
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Using conventional Bear Fan wisdom explain to me how bringing in a top ranked RB who is expected to go to the Raiders is a smokescreen.
We have brought in exactly 1 defensive player that's worthy of our pick. If we're not going offense that would mean that's the defensive player we're getting or we're drafting blind.
Without crunching a bunch of boards I see a lot of defensive players we could've brought in to smokescreen the one that we did bring in. Unless all the offense on our board is gone it's offense with #10. There is no smoke.

I can almost guarantee you Jeanty is on the table.
He might be our 10th option but there's a scenario where The Chicago Bears draft Ashton Jeanty with the 10th pick in the 2025 NFL Draft.
I'm not saying it's a smokescreen... I definitely think they like him, but...

You can definitely use it that way. For example, lets just argue that the Bears want Kelvin Banks Jr... and the Niners do as well.

If the Bears have decided NOT to bring in Banks, but are bringing in Jeanty and Hampton, a team like the Niners would be less inclined to feel the need to trade up to 8 or 9 to grab Banks cause they probably believe the Bears will take Jeanty if he slips or they'll just take Hampton. Orchestrating this dire need for a position group, whether or not you'd actually be able to draft the guy, can be a smokescreen.

Another example could be Mykel Williams. Maybe the Saints love him... and they see the Bears and think "The Bears haven't brought Mykel in for a top 30 and they seem to really want a RB cause they brought in Jeanty and Hampton. I can swap picks with the Niners or Cowboys and probably still get Mykel." So, instead of them drafting Mykel at 9, he now falls into the Bears laps and the Saints lose the guy they wanted.

Do I think the Bears are doing that? No, I don't, but anything can be a strategic piece of misdirection if a team wants it to be.
 

DefNextYear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2024
Posts:
3,533
Liked Posts:
3,385
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Man, It would suck to draft a TE who may not even be an improvement from cold cement.

It would suck even more to see the packers get the best cb in the draft at fucking #23, essentially patching one of if not their biggest weakness.

Then they are getting one of my favorite DT's in the 2nd. While the bears reach for another project OT instead who's ceiling is average in the NFL...we already have one of those.

Fantastic draft if you are a packers fan I guess.
I was thinking the same... actually all 3 teams load up at CB. I think two good values on the DL in the 2nd too.

On the Bears side though, I'd be a big fan of Ersery in the 2nd.
 

Discus fish salesman

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2018
Posts:
16,377
Liked Posts:
21,418
I was thinking the same... actually all 3 teams load up at CB. I think two good values on the DL in the 2nd too.

On the Bears side though, I'd be a big fan of Ersery in the 2nd.
The idea that erserys ceiling is average is a pretty stupid statement. His ceiling is why he has value because it's extremely high. His floor is being a bust though.
 

legendxofxlink

Whistle Dixie
Joined:
Apr 25, 2014
Posts:
11,630
Liked Posts:
11,750
Location:
Tennessee
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nashville Predators
  1. ETSU Buccaneers
  2. Tennessee Volunteers
Dane Brugler just released a 7 round mock at The Athletic. Here are the results for the NFC North.

Chicago Bears

1 (10). TE Tyler Warren, Penn State
2 (39). RB TreVeyon Henderson, Ohio State
2 (41). OT Aireontae Ersery, OT, Minnesota
3 (72). Edge Jack Sawyer, Ohio State
5 (148). S Jaylen Reed, Penn State
7 (233). LB Cody Lindenberg, Minnesota
7 (240). DT Kyonte Hamilton, Rutgers

Detroit Lions

1 (28). CB Maxwell Hairston, Kentucky
2 (60). Edge JT Tuimoloau, Ohio State
3 (102). OT/G Wyatt Milum, West Virginia
4 (130). LB Jeffrey Bassa, Oregon
6 (196). DT Nazir Stackhouse, Georgia
7 (228). WR Nick Nash, San Jose State
7 (244). S Rayuan Lane III, Navy

Green Bay Packers

1 (23). CB Will Johnson, Michigan
2 (54). DT Darius Alexander, Toledo
3 (87). WR Elic Ayomanor, Stanford
4 (124). Edge Barryn Sorrell, Texas
5 (159). G/C Joe Huber, Wisconsin
6 (198). TE Thomas Fidone II, Nebraska
7 (237). LB Jamon Dumas-Johnson, Kentucky
7 (250). QB Kurtis Rourke, Indiana

Minnesota Vikings

1 (24). CB Jahdae Barron, Texas
3 (97). G Dylan Fairchild, Georgia
5 (139). DT Warren Brinson, Georgia
6 (187). RB Jaydon Blue, Texas

What an ass mock…. 2 top 10 players going late in the 1st to division rivals and bears get a fucking tight end in the top 10…. ASS!
 

Discus fish salesman

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2018
Posts:
16,377
Liked Posts:
21,418
Using conventional Bear Fan wisdom explain to me how bringing in a top ranked RB who is expected to go to the Raiders is a smokescreen.
We have brought in exactly 1 defensive player that's worthy of our pick. If we're not going offense that would mean that's the defensive player we're getting or we're drafting blind.
Without crunching a bunch of boards I see a lot of defensive players we could've brought in to smokescreen the one that we did bring in. Unless all the offense on our board is gone it's offense with #10. There is no smoke.

I can almost guarantee you Jeanty is on the table.
He might be our 10th option but there's a scenario where The Chicago Bears draft Ashton Jeanty with the 10th pick in the 2025 NFL Draft.
You know there's teams that don't even do any 30 visits? How do they do their whole draft blind?!?
 

Top