Doesn't seem you do understand. Making judgements based on extremely small sample sizes are the dumb posts.
Flipping from one small sample size that proved itself wrong to the next small sample size is either moronic or simply trolling.
So if Trubisky goes 28/33 for 5TD's and no Interceptions, and throws 2 perfect Bombs in stride to our speed guys... no one should make a judgement that Trubisky is possibly going to be the answer in post following those plays? Because the sample size is one game?
I thought all of this was fluid? If people are honestly so aware that they know that snap judgement isn't anything that "smart" people would do when analyzing football, then why are so many people taking up the mantle of captain save a "mitch" and bashing people from simple expressing their minute by minute observations of other QB that are in direct comparison to the one we drafted.. Of course long term judgement will be made over time... but a good play is a good play in real time --
That's like saying in a boxing match to not get excited that someone got Knocked down in round 1 because there are 12 rounds.. Well Round 1 KO's happen. It's sports. People will react and have opinions --- across the entire gamut of timelessness --