STEAL
New member
- Joined:
- Apr 18, 2010
- Posts:
- 482
- Liked Posts:
- 68
I only question your ratings because, if you have all these A and A+ players, why did it take a shootout on the last day of the season to barely squeak into the playoffs in a very weak Eastern Conference? I dont watch the flyers much, was it just chemistry issues?
The hawks players are all A's or A+ and we played like them all year and almost won the much tougher western conference. IDK, thats just what im thinking
As for the bolded part,
With us winning, all the contract bonuses kicked in so we are operating with 4-5 million dollars less than the rest of the league.
Also, Huet;s salary will count against us until the season starts because we cant put him in rockford until the season starts.
Between Huet and the bonuses, thats 9-10 mill we lose automatically to spend this offseason
According to most people, we had major chemistry issues up until the Boston series.
“They’re not a seventh seed,” Blackhawks defenseman Brian Campbell said of the Flyers. “Everybody else in this room would say the same thing. They had a tough regular season with their chemistry and everything. Then they jelled together and got through some injuries.
“That’s something we all laugh about with the underdog thing and all. These are two teams that deserve to be here and match up pretty well against each other. We’re both fighting for every inch.”
http://www.nj.com/flyers/index.ssf/2010/06/philadelphia_flyers_look_like.html
Flyers on the Brink: No Depth, Chemistry, ‘Philly Tough’ Persona | The Hockey Writers
You're a fucking moron, I am sorry but there are so many problems with what you have said...
#1 You don't have the cap space for Nabakov or any of the top 4 free agent goaltenders right now.
#2 Our 2 man defense? Look at how much ice time Pronger had to play for you guys and you are calling our defense front loaded? I guess you also forgot the key roles Campbell and Hjalmarsson. I noticed you pointed out you have the best 6 man defense in the NHL, our top 4 is far better than your top 4 and those are the guys who get the most ice time... I can care less if you have a better 5th and 6th... also you have no idea what Lalonde is capable of.
Richards is an A+? Compared to who? He is a good young two way center with some grit but Toews, Crosby, Backstrom, Datsyuk, Zetterberg, Kopitar, Stamkos, Sedin, Thornton are all better centermen (and those are players just off the top of my head, I am sure I missed a couple). I am not bashing Richards I like him as a player but he is a B+.
Carter and Gagne are A players? Yea they really showed it by doing nothing in the finals, your team was carried by Danny Breire... he was your team in the finals. His linemates looked good playing with him so they got credit as well but Briere was the catalyst.
Like someone pointed out... you made the playoffs by 1 point in the weak eastern conference and got some hot goaltending to carry your team into the finals. Our core team is intact and still far better than Phillys.
Ask yourself this honestly... would you trade your entire team for Chicagos? Sorry I don't usually rant but this guy is fucking moron and is overrating his team beyond belief.
Did you read the ratings in the quote? I gave Toews an A++. He's elite, much like Crosby, Ovechkin, Kopitar, etc.
Kane still has to develop, but as of right now, an A+ is all he deserves. Richards continues to prove his value in the league, and proved himself throughout the olympics, too. Were you not around for them? Richards and Kane both had 5 points, Richards going +5 and Kane +4. Kane had a much better season and had 5 more points in the post season, but hell I think Richards is A+ caliber. Carter and Gagne both rushed their recoveries to play in the playoffs, moron. Were the finals the only part of the playoffs you paid attention to? And to answer your question, I'd never trade the entire team to Chicago, but what true fan would.
Oh and regarding our defense... *cough* http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=533659 *cough*
Last edited: