I am sorry. I agree these look like pretty smart assumptions, I think only point #4 could be considered a fact and is maybe not entirely true as he can choose to sit out.
Or it just might kick start the negotiations, which seems to be his intent.
You said earlier that him not practicing affected his value negatively. This info makes that obviously wrong.
You’re an idiot.
Then you guys have allot in common
How did I say anything different here? Lol. You people will twist yourselves in knots trying to win an internet “debate”…
Hes an expert
If a damn safety can net 2 firsts then smith ? should be able to net at least one first. There are aggressive gms out there
Responding to a substantive post with an insult tells us a lot about you.
If the Bears were working toward signing him, and thought it was progressing nicely, then they did not feel that his hold in was the reason he hasn't signed yet. Basic logic.
It's also against the posting rules for this thread. Please believe that i am SMASHING the report button on this completely unacceptable behavior in the SFTO TC thread.
And you know that him holding out wasn’t one of the reasons for a lower offer how? Or that today’s tactic isn’t going to affect it? Please share your sources…lol
Cc: @doofus
This is getting tiresome. The offer came before training camp. That's why he's been holding in. If they thought it was progressing nicely even though he was holding in, that means that they were negotiating in good faith while he was holding in and the offer wasn't based on him holding in. Today's tactic had nothing to do with our discussion. Not difficult to follow.
This is a historically bad take by yourself. Congratulations
