- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 63,300
- Liked Posts:
- 40,399
Your argument was Jenkins isn't a fit. It is plausible that Quan is not at fit as well. We know Roquan can play at this level which is something that can't be said yet (perhaps ever) of Jenkins. My question is, do you feel the same. If Roquan is not a fit for Flus do you agree with us letting him walk. I'm not talking about contract demands. I'm saying strictly from a scheme standpoint. Do you let Roquan walk if he isn't a fit for Flus' scheme?
Nope because at the time he was drafted I said he was an ideal fit as a WILL and actually thought he was undersized as a 3-4 ILB given they have to take on mlre blocks. Playing WILL hides his biggest weakness which is taking on blocks. In fact I think the reason why he bites on play action is because he is trying to get ahead of any would be blockers because he doesnt want to take on blockers. Something less likley to happen at WILL since they are left unblocked more.
By contrast outside zone exposes Jenkins to what he is least good at ie moving well laterally consistently.
But if I pretended Quan was not a scheme fit then yes I trade him rather than spend a bunch of money to fit a square peg into a round hole.