anotheridiot
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jul 15, 2016
- Posts:
- 5,935
- Liked Posts:
- 791
That's a bit of a misrepresentation. They tried to resign Jake before signing Darvish, and then still offered him the same as Darvish accepted. Jake chose to move on. I don't think it's fair to say the Cubs chose Darvish over Jake. They chose Darvish over being left empty handed.
And Jake is on the downturn.
There is so much mental in this league. A guy comes to an organization, wins the cy young, two shutouts in what 2 league months with a winter between, took up ALL the slack that Lester left his first year adjusting to being the highest paid pitcher ever for the cubs, all of this being done being paid a small percentage of what that Lester guy just got to be your ace. He worked under paid, then when it was time to get paid they still tried to stay cheap.
Guess you can say attempting to buy out KB's Arby for a 200 million deal was also cheap.
Yes, the cubs moved on from Jake. I dont know why they went Darvish after imploding in the playoffs. It made no sense.
but this leads to the point of why in the hell do we want Theo to sign any big money free agents that this organization did not develop? It has not worked out well.
We trade the one guy that will tear it up on the southside in Eloy, the only guy we had that had the chance of being a TOR guy in Cease to get the bigger name.
How many of us are just waiting for him to move Alzolay?