OT: New name for WFT

Bearly

Dissed membered
Donator
Joined:
Aug 17, 2011
Posts:
43,318
Liked Posts:
23,565
Location:
Palatine, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
'We' thread got bumped today where I describe all the military terminology in football. Name is meh but not too surprising.
 

SugabearMVP

Well-known member
Joined:
Nov 20, 2012
Posts:
984
Liked Posts:
804
Location:
California
Darn, I was hoping it would be something more accurate... like Washington Wokesters.
 

Bearcub13

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 22, 2020
Posts:
1,136
Liked Posts:
660
As long as Washington went with a military theme, they should have gone with Warhogs...
 

vabearsfan15

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 12, 2013
Posts:
7,533
Liked Posts:
5,359
Iy favorite option was Admirals, but they would have essentially stole that name from Norlfok's semi pro hockey team.

Commanders is ok. I think it will grow on everybody. Heck people were starting to like the Washington Football Team.
 

Anytime23

Boding Well
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
37,139
Liked Posts:
35,884
I want to know if Dan Snyder and his PR team reached out to all of the commanders in the country to see if this name offends them.
 

Ares

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
42,169
Liked Posts:
34,919
Shoulda just gone with Washington Kangaroos.

At least Kangaroos are interesting.
 

pablovi

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 23, 2012
Posts:
6,720
Liked Posts:
2,352
Location:
México city
I like the Washington Football team.
 

DC

Minister of Archaic Titillations
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
11,462
Liked Posts:
8,899
Location:
Colorado
The DERs lose once a again, to the mighty Chicago Bears, 24 to zero.
 

Toast88

Well-known member
Joined:
May 10, 2014
Posts:
13,542
Liked Posts:
13,404
Good read here: Washington Commanders: Inside the NFL franchise's search for a new nickname and logo

Man, it really sounds like they operated completely out of fear and let the lawyers do all the thinking:

Among the names they researched heavily: The Washington, D.C. Football Club and the RedWolves. There were problems with both. The DCFC was heavily considered, and they even designed logos. They wanted to play off the temporary Football Team name. But during the trademark search, they discovered there was a professional soccer team in Michigan called the Detroit City Football Club -- DCFC -- that had the colors burgundy and gold, same as Washington.

"If we had gone with that without doing that check, not only the name would have been in jeopardy but the burgundy and gold would have been in jeopardy," Wright said. "They could have said we own the brand and the colors, you have to change both your name and the colors. That would have been the ultimate disaster."

With the RedWolves, a popular choice on social media, they kept running into roadblocks. Every time they would design a wolf logo, the trademark lawyers -- internal and external -- would warn of issues. Often it was because the logo looked too much like others already in use. Sometimes the angle of the profile was too close to another. Finding a way to make it distinct became difficult.

They did not want a situation like the Cleveland Guardians baseball team, which announced its name change last July and soon became embroiled in a lawsuit -- since settled -- with a roller derby team in the city that used the same name. That situation led Wright to fret over last-minute issues that could arise even after the announcement.

Another factor: There was already a Timberwolves in the NBA, and Arkansas State is known as the Red Wolves. Washington wanted to be unique and own its brand, not worrying about any potential future conflict if it decided to alter the logo or design in any way.



Sounds like bullshit to me, but I'm not a lawyer. Seems to me you can kind of work your way around a lot of that stuff, though. They use the Cleveland Guardians as a cautionary tale, but that lawsuit was settled for what was probably pennies on the dollar.

Also, the Minnesota Timberwolves are not fucking suing an NFL team.
 

ijustposthere

Message Board Hero
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
33,700
Liked Posts:
25,869
Location:
Any-Town, USA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
  2. Purdue Boilermakers
Iy favorite option was Admirals, but they would have essentially stole that name from Norlfok's semi pro hockey team.

Commanders is ok. I think it will grow on everybody. Heck people were starting to like the Washington Football Team.
Commanders is stupid.
 

Yogi

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 28, 2012
Posts:
383
Liked Posts:
594
Location:
Tennessee
Good read here: Washington Commanders: Inside the NFL franchise's search for a new nickname and logo

Man, it really sounds like they operated completely out of fear and let the lawyers do all the thinking:

Among the names they researched heavily: The Washington, D.C. Football Club and the RedWolves. There were problems with both. The DCFC was heavily considered, and they even designed logos. They wanted to play off the temporary Football Team name. But during the trademark search, they discovered there was a professional soccer team in Michigan called the Detroit City Football Club -- DCFC -- that had the colors burgundy and gold, same as Washington.

"If we had gone with that without doing that check, not only the name would have been in jeopardy but the burgundy and gold would have been in jeopardy," Wright said. "They could have said we own the brand and the colors, you have to change both your name and the colors. That would have been the ultimate disaster."

With the RedWolves, a popular choice on social media, they kept running into roadblocks. Every time they would design a wolf logo, the trademark lawyers -- internal and external -- would warn of issues. Often it was because the logo looked too much like others already in use. Sometimes the angle of the profile was too close to another. Finding a way to make it distinct became difficult.

They did not want a situation like the Cleveland Guardians baseball team, which announced its name change last July and soon became embroiled in a lawsuit -- since settled -- with a roller derby team in the city that used the same name. That situation led Wright to fret over last-minute issues that could arise even after the announcement.

Another factor: There was already a Timberwolves in the NBA, and Arkansas State is known as the Red Wolves. Washington wanted to be unique and own its brand, not worrying about any potential future conflict if it decided to alter the logo or design in any way.



Sounds like bullshit to me, but I'm not a lawyer. Seems to me you can kind of work your way around a lot of that stuff, though. They use the Cleveland Guardians as a cautionary tale, but that lawsuit was settled for what was probably pennies on the dollar.

Also, the Minnesota Timberwolves are not fucking suing an NFL team.

They should have just bought the Detroit City Football Club and changed their name/colors so they could use the branding in the NFL without issue. Snyder's house is probably worth more than a USL team.
 

vabearsfan15

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 12, 2013
Posts:
7,533
Liked Posts:
5,359
Good read here: Washington Commanders: Inside the NFL franchise's search for a new nickname and logo

Man, it really sounds like they operated completely out of fear and let the lawyers do all the thinking:

Among the names they researched heavily: The Washington, D.C. Football Club and the RedWolves. There were problems with both. The DCFC was heavily considered, and they even designed logos. They wanted to play off the temporary Football Team name. But during the trademark search, they discovered there was a professional soccer team in Michigan called the Detroit City Football Club -- DCFC -- that had the colors burgundy and gold, same as Washington.

"If we had gone with that without doing that check, not only the name would have been in jeopardy but the burgundy and gold would have been in jeopardy," Wright said. "They could have said we own the brand and the colors, you have to change both your name and the colors. That would have been the ultimate disaster."

With the RedWolves, a popular choice on social media, they kept running into roadblocks. Every time they would design a wolf logo, the trademark lawyers -- internal and external -- would warn of issues. Often it was because the logo looked too much like others already in use. Sometimes the angle of the profile was too close to another. Finding a way to make it distinct became difficult.

They did not want a situation like the Cleveland Guardians baseball team, which announced its name change last July and soon became embroiled in a lawsuit -- since settled -- with a roller derby team in the city that used the same name. That situation led Wright to fret over last-minute issues that could arise even after the announcement.

Another factor: There was already a Timberwolves in the NBA, and Arkansas State is known as the Red Wolves. Washington wanted to be unique and own its brand, not worrying about any potential future conflict if it decided to alter the logo or design in any way.



Sounds like bullshit to me, but I'm not a lawyer. Seems to me you can kind of work your way around a lot of that stuff, though. They use the Cleveland Guardians as a cautionary tale, but that lawsuit was settled for what was probably pennies on the dollar.

Also, the Minnesota Timberwolves are not fucking suing an NFL team.
You literally just quoted an article where the Clevland Guardians were sued by a f***ing roller derby team. I dont think it's a stretch for the Timberwolves to sue an NFL team.
 

Top