and yet they still won? i don’t know what your point is? they “would have lost” if donald wasn’t healthy and Goff wasn’t a putz, the packers can’t control that. they beat the team in front of them.
Davante Adams, or his supposed lack of production in the NFFCG, was not the reason they lost. he still had a TD reception the same as MVS did, who actually out produced Adams as they shifted coverage to Adams. that’s why this offense works so well, you can’t stop their run game and pass game at the same time.
if you want to use hypotheticals as some basis for your argument i can do the same. the Packers were firmly in control of that game until King got burnt before half time. that completely changed the game. You could make the same argument they don’t lose if King wasn’t a putz you could for Goff.