This but he wasn't the worst DC and his 1st 3 years as HC, he was 11-5 in all 3. At least the Colts had a reason to keep him around.
I heard something on the radio yesterday that had me thinking. It was just a moment of listening but, I think it was, Sage Rosenfels said that Mitch was really let down by Nagy. This is not excuse making for Mitch but he stated that guys that aren't natural readers tend to catch on by seeing the same thing repeatedly and that Nagy's inconsistency has hurt Mitch be all he can be, whatever that is. That makes perfect sense to me. That was all I got but it pissed me off.
Lazor's O, keeping it simple for stupid, was a godsend for Mitch and a good coach could see why. Mitch sure was a lot less tentative. Why TF would you deviate from it in the 2 most important games of the year after that success. Tougher D's and it may not have been much different but it couldn't have been worse and ego over results is a very poor 'quality' for any leader.
Nagy tries something out of desperation, remarkably, it works and then he thinks that he can do it better. His sequencing sucked as he either did something to a fault or abandoned it without setting up a D outside the one play to Wims. His Nagy added plays sucked with the same caveat but maybe his insistence to use Wims is the fly in that ointment. His clock management sucked. There's a theme here.