- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 27,678
- Liked Posts:
- 10,445
Im fine, CountYou keep repeating yourself, are you ok? Out of beer? Crash another vehicle? Can't rub your last 2 brane cells together to make a coherent thought? Out of dementia meds again?
Im fine, CountYou keep repeating yourself, are you ok? Out of beer? Crash another vehicle? Can't rub your last 2 brane cells together to make a coherent thought? Out of dementia meds again?
Not unless you get pace to find a bunch of young rookies who can contribute, which is about a 0% chance.
We need another ILB, another DE, another edge rusher, another safety(maybe two) and another slot corner.
We also have zero cap.
What kind of DC will the Bears be able to get for 1 year?
Every coach in the league knows that Nagy is going to get fired after next season
Glad hes gone but the D was still magnitudes better than the O and Nagy is still here.Thank God that’s over. Jeesh!
Congratulations on the retirement Pags. Didnt work out here, but he still had an impressive coaching career and beat cancer - that's a badass accomplishment. Hope you bang bad bitches (or retire peacefully with your wife) and never shank off the tee. ?
Nagy wont be lame duck Pace will be. Nagy had a 5 year deal.So who can this lame duck coach who didn’t realize he had a great DC a on his own staff get to come here now?
Nagy wont be lame duck Pace will be. Nagy had a 5 year deal.
Im worried we will see a 1 year contract extension for Pace to align them.ok maybe not literally but he is going to be. Perform the same as this year or worse and gone.
This defense will be even worse next year.
This offense will probably be just as bad.
I have no faith towards next season unless they somehow pull off a move for watson or trade up to get fields/wilson.
We have both shelley and vildor - no we don’t need another slot CB.... u have to trust the talent u picked and give them chance to grow .... they both flashed talentNot unless you get pace to find a bunch of young rookies who can contribute, which is about a 0% chance.
We need another ILB, another DE, another edge rusher, another safety(maybe two) and another slot corner.
We also have zero cap.
This but he wasn't the worst DC and his 1st 3 years as HC, he was 11-5 in all 3. At least the Colts had a reason to keep him around.Chuck Pagano was the almost exact defensive version of Matt Nagy. He was a DC for only 1 season in a system that flourished before him and after he left. Then he became a head coach, where his offense had to carry the team because his defenses were the worst in the league.
To only score 3 points in 59 minutes WITHOUT a turnover is unheard of.. Scared, bad, inept, whatever, the blame falls on the coach and playcaller. It's too common of a theme, he doesn't learn from his mistakes.This but he wasn't the worst DC and his 1st 3 years as HC, he was 11-5 in all 3. At least the Colts had a reason to keep him around.
I heard something on the radio yesterday that had me thinking. It was just a moment of listening but, I think it was, Sage Rosenfels said that Mitch was really let down by Nagy. This is not excuse making for Mitch but he stated that guys that aren't natural readers tend to catch on by seeing the same thing repeatedly and that Nagy's inconsistency has hurt Mitch be all he can be, whatever that is. That makes perfect sense to me. That was all I got but it pissed me off.
Lazor's O, keeping it simple for stupid, was a godsend for Mitch and a good coach could see why. Mitch sure was a lot less tentative. Why TF would you deviate from it in the 2 most important games of the year after that success. Tougher D's and it may not have been much different but it couldn't have been worse and ego over results is a very poor 'quality' for any leader.
Nagy tries something out of desperation, remarkably, it works and then he thinks that he can do it better. His sequencing sucked as he either did something to a fault or abandoned it without setting up a D outside the one play to Wims. His Nagy added plays sucked with the same caveat but maybe his insistence to use Wims is the fly in that ointment. His clock management sucked. There's a theme here.
Don't forget his clock and situational decisions. When you are a huge underdog, you are the team that needs to make something happen and be aggressive. He played to lose but not by as much in both those games and that doesn't mean a wild open Offense but don't grind yourself into the ground or sit on the ball at the end of halves etc and it's not just that. He still gets aggressive, but at the wrong times like the 4th and a foot where he rolls Mitch and it's dead before it starts. He's situationally impaired.To only score 3 points in 59 minutes WITHOUT a turnover is unheard of.. Scared, bad, inept, whatever, the blame falls on the coach and playcaller. It's too common of a theme, he doesn't learn from his mistakes.
Even last Packers game, Mitch almost had 80% completion percentage. Nagy kept kicking FG's in the redzone while watching his defense get smoked. Literally, just throw the ball up to Jimmy or Cole, at least give your team a shot. . .
Rosenfels made some really good points in that discussion. He said Nagy's offensive game plan against the Saints was one of the worst he has ever seen. He talked about Nagy designing a system that relies on the QB being great and the rest of the league are designing offenses that simplify things for the QB, so they are part of the team but not depended on to be the team. And knowing Mitch's limitations, it's even worse that he expects him to succeed in that offense. He said Nagy needs to be replaced immediately.This but he wasn't the worst DC and his 1st 3 years as HC, he was 11-5 in all 3. At least the Colts had a reason to keep him around.
I heard something on the radio yesterday that had me thinking. It was just a moment of listening but, I think it was, Sage Rosenfels said that Mitch was really let down by Nagy. This is not excuse making for Mitch but he stated that guys that aren't natural readers tend to catch on by seeing the same thing repeatedly and that Nagy's inconsistency has hurt Mitch be all he can be, whatever that is. That makes perfect sense to me. That was all I got but it pissed me off.
Lazor's O, keeping it simple for stupid, was a godsend for Mitch and a good coach could see why. Mitch sure was a lot less tentative. Why TF would you deviate from it in the 2 most important games of the year after that success. Tougher D's and it may not have been much different but it couldn't have been worse and ego over results is a very poor 'quality' for any leader.
Nagy tries something out of desperation, remarkably, it works and then he thinks that he can do it better. His sequencing sucked as he either did something to a fault or abandoned it without setting up a D outside the one play to Wims. His Nagy added plays sucked with the same caveat but maybe his insistence to use Wims is the fly in that ointment. His clock management sucked. There's a theme here.