Diddy1122 wrote:
I'll give ya Phil. But I wouldn't call the Rodman trade a steal. Or a bigger steal than Gasol for Kwame. It was a risk at the time. He was like Artest. Weirder & weirder behavior. He headbutted Stacey King. Did you even remember that? Had 20 different hair colors, & was known to party every night. It coulda went bad if it wasn't for Phil. And Jack Haley.
First, the hair colors ... that's BS. When did haircolor prevent anyone from playing good basketball.
Second, the trade happened after the Spurs were destroyed by the Rockets in the WCF. Go and watch that series. I just did a couple of month ago. Hakeem absolutely destroyed Robinson. Rodman played pretty well, even if he showed some attitude. He was actually trying really really hard.
he had 20, 8 (in just 17 min), 14, 19, 12 and 17 rebounds and played some really good D. the truth is robinson just got destroyed by hakeem, but he was the face of the franchise and they needed a scape goat. that team underachieved and someone had to be responsible. rodman was the ideal scape goat. they could blame it on "character issues" and this way they won't have to explain why the mvp got schooled.
of course catching hakeem in god mode didn't help, but blaming the loss on rodman was a dick move. and, turns out, a bad move for them, cause they traded him at 2 cents a dollar.
PS: i'd headbutt stacey king now just to make him stfu. if someone headbutts a bulls player doesn't mean he's automatically crazy or should be treated like a leper. don't forget rodman did the same things or even worse to frank bricowsky in the '96 finals, but i bet at the time you loved every minute of it. barkley fought with a bunch of people too, but i doubt you'd trade him for will f**king perdue for that.
in the end, if you consider the results of the trade, rodman was much more of a steal than gasol. so far 3peat trumps a title and a finals appearance.