- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
^Good, now we get to show him up too.
^Good, now we get to show him up too.
^Good, now we get to show him up too.
not if your there!
i heard cnm is going
get a clue dude
wrong! NOT baseball. For the last fucking time.
NO 5th seed or lower has won the cup since 1991, nothing 6th or worse has EVER won the cup. Only twice has an 8th seed been to the cup, and one can argue that philly doesnt even count because they were tied.
Baseball different from hockey. end of story.
Nice reading comprehension dipshit.
His main point was that the best team usually doesn't win... I can remember several President's Trophy winners knocked out early recently.
And just because a low seed has never done it before doesn't mean it can't happen.
And the Flyers weren't the 8th seed... they were 7th. Montreal was 8th that year.
Is there much chance of us winning the cup? No. Is it impossible just because of a number? No. Is it highly unlikely? Yes.
I do have a clue, I wasn't seriously expecting us to do so, but Lund doesn't make it an automatic loss or NYR would be undefeated right now. You need to get a clue.
Back to the topic kiddos. Remember, rangers @ hawks thread not who is dumber than who
I'd rather see Crawford in net. He seems to step up in bigger games against the better teams like this.
Emery wasn't very good in St. Louis, giving up a few weak goals, and I think it'd be better to give Crawford a shot.
What do I know, though?
odds bollig will go with scott tonight?