Report: Thibodeau not happy Deng could walk after season

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,779
Liked Posts:
7,450
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
agree with this 100%

Paxson cant seem to find a good trade unless its with Isiah Thomas
Good trade is more appropriately read as overwhelmingly lopsided deal in our favor. I'd pull a FT or Hef and sarcastically remark about how stupid the Bulls are for not ripping off other teams more often, but seeing as the Lakers are able to do so time and time again and that Boston/Brooklyn deal happened I can't really call it completely outlandish.
 

Xplosive

*Warning*...^Triggered by Mentioning The Haul...
Joined:
Aug 15, 2013
Posts:
5,891
Liked Posts:
3,171
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
Good trade is more appropriately read as overwhelmingly lopsided deal in our favor. I'd pull a FT or Hef and sarcastically remark about how stupid the Bulls are for not ripping off other teams more often, but seeing as the Lakers are able to do so time and time again and that Boston/Brooklyn deal happened I can't really call it completely outlandish.

How about ANY trade? Its easy to claim people have outlandish expectations when there is nothing to compare it to. LaMarcus Aldridge has been rumoured in trades this summer and I can go on and on about other players that have been traded during the Paxson regime. The guy doesn't know how to make a deal and just thinks it safer to wait for the team to develop or plan on free agents wanting to come to Chicago because of how great the city is.
 

jooo83

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 16, 2013
Posts:
2,901
Liked Posts:
1,374
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. DePaul Blue Demons
I've supported Bulls management from the beginning but if they trade Deng for some shitty chucking two-guard instead of paying him, or they just flat out let him walk outright, they can go **** themselves for listening to this Special person fan-base instead of actually trying to win a championship.

Luol Deng is a GREAT player who for some reason Bulls fans have been wanting to kick out the door for like 5 years now.

So you think they might let Deng go because of what the fans say? That's comical at best.
 

Daa Bearrs

New member
Joined:
Aug 28, 2012
Posts:
557
Liked Posts:
263
How about ANY trade? Its easy to claim people have outlandish expectations when there is nothing to compare it to. LaMarcus Aldridge has been rumoured in trades this summer and I can go on and on about other players that have been traded during the Paxson regime. The guy doesn't know how to make a deal and just thinks it safer to wait for the team to develop or plan on free agents wanting to come to Chicago because of how great the city is.

Responding to the bolded:

What else should they do? This is a team that has a franchise/elite head coach, and a franchise/elite star player (along with other solid parts). The foundation has been established, and now they are going to keep trying to build a cohesive core by drafting players of both need and players who fit Thibs system (can play defense, has good character, etc.).

The Bulls are modeling themselves after the Spurs and staying the hell away from the likes of what the Knicks are doing. I don't know why this approach is not applauded.
 

nwfisch

Hall of Famer
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Nov 12, 2010
Posts:
25,053
Liked Posts:
11,503
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Minnesota United FC
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Responding to the bolded:

What else should they do? This is a team that has a franchise/elite head coach, and a franchise/elite star player (along with other solid parts). The foundation has been established, and now they are going to keep trying to build a cohesive core by drafting players of both need and players who fit Thibs system (can play defense, has good character, etc.).

The Bulls are modeling themselves after the Spurs and staying the hell away from the likes of what the Knicks are doing. I don't know why this approach is not applauded.

People on this forum have a case of stating "the grass is greener in Miami."

Well OK, but the Bulls grass is still pretty damn green and frankly can get yellow a lot easier than it can get greener.
 

Xplosive

*Warning*...^Triggered by Mentioning The Haul...
Joined:
Aug 15, 2013
Posts:
5,891
Liked Posts:
3,171
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
Responding to the bolded:

What else should they do? This is a team that has a franchise/elite head coach, and a franchise/elite star player (along with other solid parts). The foundation has been established, and now they are going to keep trying to build a cohesive core by drafting players of both need and players who fit Thibs system (can play defense, has good character, etc.).

The Bulls are modeling themselves after the Spurs and staying the hell away from the likes of what the Knicks are doing. I don't know why this approach is not applauded.
The Spurs homegrown approach is fine for a small town like San Antonio, I prefer the Lakers approach. The Bulls haven't won since what 1998 now and have been at lowest levels of the league trying that one player at a time draft approach. I don't want to keep talking about the good old days like we do with the Bears so I'm not interested in John Paxon's "we like our guys" idiot approach. If the Bulls hadn't lucked into Derrick Rose we would still be at a Milwaukee Buck level.

Who the hell wants to wait a lifetime for them to luck into another good draft pick while you guys are talking about green grass, maybe YOU are happy being the new age version of Jerry Sloan and the Utah Jazz but I sure as hell am not. Who cares if you win 50-60 games every year and get bounced out in the second round or finally get to the finals just to get smashed by the superstar team like the Jazz did by MJ and Pip.

No Thanks.
:shifty:
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
47,428
Liked Posts:
36,770
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
Actually Amnestying (sp) Boozer after this season is the only one they probably will do.
Meh. I don't want them to do it just to do it. They need to have something in place the next day.
 

Xplosive

*Warning*...^Triggered by Mentioning The Haul...
Joined:
Aug 15, 2013
Posts:
5,891
Liked Posts:
3,171
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
Meh. I don't want them to do it just to do it. They need to have something in place the next day.
The falloff from Boozer to Taj Gibson is like stepping off a curb. If the Bulls don't make a trade for a stretch 4, Gibson can easily fill the shoes of Boozer. Maybe a few less points but overall Boozer wouldn't be missed.
 

Daa Bearrs

New member
Joined:
Aug 28, 2012
Posts:
557
Liked Posts:
263
The falloff from Boozer to Taj Gibson is like stepping off a curb. If the Bulls don't make a trade for a stretch 4, Gibson can easily fill the shoes of Boozer. Maybe a few less points but overall Boozer wouldn't be missed.

But isn't Mirotic supposed to be a stretch 4?
 

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,779
Liked Posts:
7,450
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
How about ANY trade? Its easy to claim people have outlandish expectations when there is nothing to compare it to. LaMarcus Aldridge has been rumoured in trades this summer and I can go on and on about other players that have been traded during the Paxson regime.
He did make that trade for John Salmons and Brad Miller several years back that had us playing some pretty good ball at the time. He turned Thabo into Taj and James Johnson into Jimmy Butler (if I followed those picks right...I might not have). Not trading for every "big name" player that has supposedly been on the market doesn't make him a failure nor does it mean he didn't try. Trades don't always magically make your team better, even if you get a good player.

The guy doesn't know how to make a deal and just thinks it safer to wait for the team to develop or plan on free agents wanting to come to Chicago because of how great the city is.
Yeah...waiting for free agents to come here has worked SO WELL thus far. They're lining up at the door!
 

Xplosive

*Warning*...^Triggered by Mentioning The Haul...
Joined:
Aug 15, 2013
Posts:
5,891
Liked Posts:
3,171
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
But isn't Mirotic supposed to be a stretch 4?
Yes he is but I don't want to wait to find out if he is any good. I say trade his potential for one that is already proven. Mirotic is current european sensation and has been the mvp of one of their multiple leagues scoring like 16 ppg (wow). The Bulls should be able to get a quality proven NBA player that can score and defend for him. Rather than waiting just to find out he is just another Danilo Gallinari.
 

Xplosive

*Warning*...^Triggered by Mentioning The Haul...
Joined:
Aug 15, 2013
Posts:
5,891
Liked Posts:
3,171
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
He did make that trade for John Salmons and Brad Miller several years back that had us playing some pretty good ball at the time. He turned Thabo into Taj and James Johnson into Jimmy Butler (if I followed those picks right...I might not have). Not trading for every "big name" player that has supposedly been on the market doesn't make him a failure nor does it mean he didn't try. Trades don't always magically make your team better, even if you get a good player.


Yeah...waiting for free agents to come here has worked SO WELL thus far. They're lining up at the door!
Um that was my point, stop waiting and thinking players are just lining up to be in Chicago. Of course you have to draft good players but you also need to make big moves to get your team over the top. Players are lining up for whoever will over pay them once they hit free agency. Thank you for pointing out that he has made a couple moves, because they were definitely forgettable. Brad Miller is the best move he has made which is pretty sad when you think about it, but I did like Brad and he got Joakim to straighten up so Pax gets credit for that. But Salmon had half of a good season and playoffs and then fell off the planet so I don't see him as a positive.

You don't get credit for having a bust pick like James Johnson when he could have had Jrue Holiday, Dejuan Blair (the guy I wanted), Byron Mullens, Danny Green, Chase Budinger, Jonas Jerebko, Jeff Teague, Darren Collinson, or Ty Lawson. I know Rose was already on the team but a backcourt of Jrue Holiday and Rose gets it done. Either way we are talking about winning a championship and you are throwing out quality bench mob players not difference makers.

Look I lived through the Tim Floyd era like all of you so I can understand if you all are still shell shocked and fear ever being that bad again, but Chicago deserves better than these nickel and dimes short sighted moves. Do you want the Bulls to be a continual dynasty like the Lakers or do you want to be the Utah Jazz?
 

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,779
Liked Posts:
7,450
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Um that was my point, stop waiting and thinking players are just lining up to be in Chicago. Of course you have to draft good players but you also need to make big moves to get your team over the top. Players are lining up for whoever will over pay them once they hit free agency.
If players were truly only concerned with their paychecks they'd never leave their current teams. On top of that, basically every team with space is going to throw the max at a max guy. Apparently, when given a choice, players pick anywhere else over Chicago. I can't fault management for giving offers, likely similar offers to what other teams are offering, and getting rejected. We have Boozer right now because he was what was left over after all the better players opted to go somewhere else.

Thank you for pointing out that he has made a couple moves, because they were definitely forgettable. Brad Miller is the best move he has made which is pretty sad when you think about it, but I did like Brad and he got Joakim to straighten up so Pax gets credit for that. But Salmon had half of a good season and playoffs and then fell off the planet so I don't see him as a positive.

You said ANY trade...so I named a memorable trade. If you recall, that trade turned an underachieving team into a team that was on pace for 50+ wins and pushed the defending champions to 7 games (John Salmons was pretty huge in that series too, but you're right, that's about all he had going for him in a Bulls uniform). But hey, if that's forgettable, I'm not sure what to tell you.

You don't get credit for having a bust pick like James Johnson when he could have had Jrue Holiday, Dejuan Blair (the guy I wanted), Byron Mullens, Danny Green, Chase Budinger, Jonas Jerebko, Jeff Teague, Darren Collinson, or Ty Lawson. I know Rose was already on the team but a backcourt of Jrue Holiday and Rose gets it done. Either way we are talking about winning a championship and you are throwing out quality bench mob players not difference makers.
Well how much more so for the Timberwolves who picked Jonny Flynn over Stephen Curry or Memphis who picked Thabeet over...anyone. It's easy to say that picks were stupid with hindsight because you see which players actually panned out. There's busts every year. The year we picked Thabo we actually picked Rodney Carney and traded him for Thabo. Thabo was an ok player for us and if our backcourt wasn't such a mess back then he could probably have been a productive player for us. But the other guy? He's not even in the league. How dumb the 76ers are I guess.

Byron Mullens? :andruw:

Why bother listing Teague, Collison, and Lawson when drafting them doesn't make sense? Just because they've had better careers than Johnson? Collison has also been replaced in the starting lineup by Derek Fisher so not sure what the point is there.

Sure, Danny Green can be considered a better player now, but at the time he was a late 2nd round pick. No one was thinking James Johnson was going to be a worse player than Danny Green. A guy like Jerebko wasn't even on anyone's radar. I remember Adam Silver being surprised that he was actually in attendance for the draft being a relative no name with a low draft stock. And considering he hasn't been able to get consistent minutes off a crappy Pistons bench, I'm not convinced he's really that much of an upgrade over Johnson anyway.

Dajuan Blair's career is bound to end sometime soon due to his knee issues...dude barely even played last year. But even without this hindsight, at the time you could argue that Johnson over Blair was reasonable, especially after he fell past 26 where we could've picked him again. In any case, we have Taj who is at least as good, if not better, than Blair anyway.

Your best argument is for Jrue Holiday, who would probably make an awesome backcourt mate for Rose if he could effectively work without the ball. Though at the time, you were looking at Holiday to be your primary ball handler, not doing what he did at UCLA rather ineffectively. I'm not sure if Holiday would be the player he is now if he was alongside Rose this whole time. Holiday also had a terrible jumper in college and pairing that with Rose, who at the time also had issues with jumpers would've seemed like a terrible fit. Arguably, Marcus Thornton could've been the best fit alongside Rose because he can shoot, but taking him at 16 definitely would've been a stretch at the time. The draft is always a gamble, you can't always be certain that who you draft will succeed. Johnson had a lot of potential to be a playmaking wing player, i just never happened.

Look I lived through the Tim Floyd era like all of you so I can understand if you all are still shell shocked and fear ever being that bad again, but Chicago deserves better than these nickel and dimes short sighted moves. Do you want the Bulls to be a continual dynasty like the Lakers or do you want to be the Utah Jazz?
Until we're gift wrapped players like the Lakers are, we'll have to settle for being the Jazz. Arguably it doesn't matter who we get unless it's Lebron because Lebron's always going to be in our way and best player in the league blah blah blah. If you recall, the Jazz did have some fans scared that they might actually beat the Bulls back in 98 before MJ shut everyone up. But if if weren't for MJ, the Jazz would probably have a couple banners hanging in their rafters. I'm not saying we don't want to be a dynasty because who in their right mind doesn't? But if you try to acquire the players to do so and they choose elsewhere, what can you do? If you pursue a player through trade and the other team flat out refuses or demands half your team in return, does that put you at fault? The Knicks traded half their team away for Melo and have gotten nowhere.

It's not about making moves left and right, it's about making the right move for the team. That move happens to be near impossible for the Bulls to pull off. They had a chance in 2010 and struck out...you can't say they never tried to improve the team. Even now, you don't know that they're not trying to make a move. Just because names have floated around on the internet doesn't mean the Bulls are ignoring every single potential trade option that may or may not have presented itself. But hey, let's go get another Ben Wallace in 2014! At least it won't be a nickel and dime move right?
 

Axl Rose

and I knew the silence of the world
Joined:
Oct 11, 2011
Posts:
12,274
Liked Posts:
4,422
johnsalmons.gif
 

Axl Rose

and I knew the silence of the world
Joined:
Oct 11, 2011
Posts:
12,274
Liked Posts:
4,422
in paxsons defense he traded JJ for the pick he ended up trading for Nikola....if Nikola pans out that was a genius move

i still think he needs to be more active in the trade market...he holds onto assets for far too long and he ends up having to overpay or let them go for nothing

look what rockets did...collected assets and traded them for a big time player in James Harden...thats how you do it
 

Shepard

Renegade
Donator
Joined:
May 31, 2013
Posts:
2,305
Liked Posts:
1,180
Location:
SE WI
Unless it is a clear and unquestioned upgrade, they need to resign Deng.

Pay a guy 8 figures who can't shoot worth a lick and can't create his own to play next to Rose........

How about no?
 

Xplosive

*Warning*...^Triggered by Mentioning The Haul...
Joined:
Aug 15, 2013
Posts:
5,891
Liked Posts:
3,171
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
Byron Mullens?

Um Byron Mullens is 7 feet tall 275 pounds, averages 10 points a game, shoots 70% from the line and over 30% from 3 point range. He is basically the same as Brad freaking Miller who you just tried to celebrate so you might wanna rethink that
:andruw:

Mullens would have filled some of the scoring and shooting we are looking for in a stretch four, the position he currently plays for the Bobcats. He is no allstar but his size and scoring allow him to be both PF and backup Center AND he was drafted way later than JJ. You are trying to defend Paxson by saying other teams made bad picks too... WHO CARES if Minnesota and Memphis were dumb too? The point isn't to find another example of incompetence and say "See, they are dumb too"....

Did the Bulls drafting Marques Teague in the first round even though they still have Derrick Rose make sense? YES not because of Derricks knee but because they still need other ball handlers and scorers. They certainly should have recognized the talent of other players like Lawson, Collinson, Holiday, and the better Teague. The GM's #1 job is to recognize talent and never pass up talent when its available regardless if you have a proven starter. This is why the Spurs have drafted so well. Its not about making random moves just for the sake of making them, its about knowing who to pay the big contracts, how to make smart deals that improve the team, and drafting talented players that fit your system regardless of who is currently on the roster.

Carlos Boozer is on the Bulls because Paxson panicked and made a dumb move, no one would have paid Boozer the contract the Bulls gave him because of his injury history but since Paxson had never made a big move and thought people would be impressed he over reacted and got left looking silly when Wade/James and Bosh played him like a fool. He should have signed David Lee who was cheaper, younger, and the better player. David Lee was even the safer pick because of Boozer's injury and he had just had a great year for the Knicks, but Paxson thought Boozer was the bigger name that would impress other free agents (again he was played like a fool). Paxson has done a 50/50 job and he needs to be upgraded, just like mediocre players need to be upgraded.


EDIT-
Like another poster stated, look at how he completed F*cked up the Omer Asik situation, we were waiting years for him just like Mirotic and after we developed him Paxson let him get away for nothing. Paxson is over his head and keeps getting Owned by smarter businessmen.
 

Shepard

Renegade
Donator
Joined:
May 31, 2013
Posts:
2,305
Liked Posts:
1,180
Location:
SE WI

Axl Rose

and I knew the silence of the world
Joined:
Oct 11, 2011
Posts:
12,274
Liked Posts:
4,422
Um Byron Mullens is 7 feet tall 275 pounds, averages 10 points a game, shoots 70% from the line and over 30% from 3 point range. He is basically the same as Brad freaking Miller who you just tried to celebrate so you might wanna rethink that
:andruw:

Mullens would have filled some of the scoring and shooting we are looking for in a stretch four, the position he currently plays for the Bobcats. He is no allstar but his size and scoring allow him to be both PF and backup Center AND he was drafted way later than JJ. You are trying to defend Paxson by saying other teams made bad picks too... WHO CARES if Minnesota and Memphis were dumb too? The point isn't to find another example of incompetence and say "See, they are dumb too"

i dont agree with you on this

mullens is complete and utter trash....his advanced stats are some of the worst ive ever seen....dude is horrific....no he isnt even on par with a washed up brad miller....dude is just terrible and im surprised he got another contract

i would still take JJ over him
 

Shepard

Renegade
Donator
Joined:
May 31, 2013
Posts:
2,305
Liked Posts:
1,180
Location:
SE WI
i dont agree with you on this

mullens is complete and utter trash....his advanced stats are some of the worst ive ever seen....dude is horrific

i would still take JJ over him

Not to mention he couldn't guard a chair...
 

Top