r1terrell23
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 3,011
- Liked Posts:
- 1,622
I think the premise is that the team that has a chance of being good has already failed and gotten a coach fired. That is just as risky a situation because the good QB and team couldn't get it done, so the expectation will be for you to win immediately, something the other coach couldn't do.I think most coaches are going to pick the established team with more talent all other things being equal. Buffalo has a much better chance of being a good team over the next few years than the Bears do. Winning is the number one thing that increases job security, and I'm guessing most coaches value that over most other things.
That said I think the Bears job will be the top few, as the capital they have to improve is huge.
Whereas in the Bears case, if a coach feels Caleb is generational, he may assume that he could make that work while having enough time to build something. His seat wouldn't get hot for 3 years unless he is a dumpster fire like Flus. I don't think this means other teams aren't desirable, just that having Caleb and cap space gives a new coach options and time.