Myk
85in25
- Joined:
- Sep 27, 2010
- Posts:
- 11,305
- Liked Posts:
- 4,597
Never said I would spend it all on one player. I just wouldn't trade down if it would cost us getting a premiere D-lineman.
Since you just stated that your argument is absurd, I'm done. We are in agreement.
There's a couple decades of NFL history to support my argument. Feel free to look it up.
I'm going to use my energy on something more worthwhile, like this joint I rolled.
You've still never said what years this plan has worked for the Bears. I'd think out of 37 years of trying your plan if it was such a great plan you'd have a long list besides '06 when we didn't win.
I'm not looking it up, I still have a memory left. We won the Super Bowl off the '85 season, a team that had plenty of talent on offense not just on defense.
When a #2 is worth multiple future firsts and/or doubling up on the whole draft but you want to spend that #2 on a premier player that is spending it all on one player. It would be just as dumb to spend that #2 on an OT who some ranks have higher than pass rush. We need a lot more than one premier player on either side of the ball.
If there's 2 top QBs and we're pretty sure #1 is getting one of them the #2 pick has a lot of value and you want to waste it.
For your plan we should've kept Mack instead. At least we knew he could hang in the NFL.
My argument was never that we should grab a QB, it was that no team in need of a QB is putting it off until next year because fans imagine more good QBs are going to declare next year than this year. But if it came down to having to spend the #2 on ourselves I would grab the QB and trade the worse of the two.