- Joined:
- Sep 28, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,997
- Liked Posts:
- 2,338
- Location:
- Somewhere in Indiana
I'd like to see the numbers on this Final.
They have to be brutal in terms of viewership.
They have to be brutal in terms of viewership.
Who here didn't tear up a little when Trevor Daley held the Cup???
Come on now, raise those hands.
Who here didn't tear up a little when Trevor Daley held the Cup???
Come on now, raise those hands.
I see him and think... "Sharp AND Johns.... why the fuk did we give them Johns?"
Cause Stanbro thought he would get value for Sharp. Should have taken the 2 2nds the Stars offered at the draft. Typical case of overvaluing a players worth
Who here didn't tear up a little when Trevor Daley held the Cup???
Come on now, raise those hands.
Phil Kessel, ftw.
'Merica.
I didn't.
I was like, "Oh yeah, I forgot about Daley."
It's the media, which have about the same hockey cred as your average hockey board poster (keep in mind HF50 is considered an average hockey board poster). Thus, it's a popularity contest pure and simple. Sometimes they get it right, like Keith, but other than that take it with a grain of salt.Fattie>Crosby in the playoffs.
Just like Crawford>Kane in 2013.
Do the voters watch the playoffs?
It's the media, which have about the same hockey cred as your average hockey board poster (keep in mind HF50 is considered an average hockey board poster). Thus, it's a popularity contest pure and simple. Sometimes they get it right, like Keith, but other than that take it with a grain of salt.
The only difference is that I'm not sure how many times Crosby has/will go on record saying Kessel should have won it. Kane said it multiple times Crawford should have won it.
Don't forget Ladyhawk
Well, okay, that was a bit of hyperbole, but he brings the average down.HF50...
No. Just no.
I'd like to see the numbers on this Final.
They have to be brutal in terms of viewership.
Maybe not exactly what you wanted, but here's something: