- Joined:
- Jun 6, 2010
- Posts:
- 15,741
- Liked Posts:
- 7,452
- Location:
- NW Burbs
If coach has a good feel for what the team needs at this point, he'll go Winston for that inspiring fire up the team pregame peptalk "let's eat some finger lickin good Ws".
I predict Fitz starts and gets rocked and Winston makes his debut at some point.
You'd rather see a guy who has shredded 3 teams in a row including one of the top defenses and SB winner to the tune of the most yards, 2nd TD's 2nd in rating, instead of a guy who hasn't played a game in 10 months, hasn't practiced in a month, and has all kinds of shit going on mentally and personally in his life?
Didn't watch any of the Bucs game, but the Saints and Steelers haven't quite been lighting it up statistically on the Defensive side of the ball...they are both near last in the league.
As for the Eagles, I'll cut him some credit on that one.
His stats could be a bit inflated, but either way he won't be throwing 400+ yards on our defense...he will come down to earth
Yes, I would rather face a mid 30's immobile QB when we have one of the best pass rushes in the nfl.
You cant throw 40 yard passes when you have less than 2 seconds to throw.
Steelers are #2 in sacks this year. He still put up 400 yards and 3 TD's.
And is Winston really that mobile?
He had all of 135 yards rushing last year.... Fitz already has a game this year rushing that is higher than Winstons best game last year.
As a side note, Winston has 1 400 yard passing game in 3 years. Fitz has 3 in the last 3....
Any Bears fan that would rather face Fitz, is likely just not an intelligent football fan.
But that's OK. We have a lot of them.
And a bears fan who thinks pitts D is good isn't an intelligent football fan either. NO might have the worst defense in the league.
Winston can MOVE better than fitz. Fitz is a fucking statue in the pocket. Do you actually watch the games? Or just look at stats? Yes, pitt is high in sacks, and they also blitz a ton. Or do you think a team starting bostic at MLB is a respectable NFL defense?
The better matchup for our defense is definitely fitzpatrick. We are not the steelers, we can get pressure with 3 lineman if we want. Ive watched all 3 of the TB games, and fitz had all day to throw in the NO game and his wideouts were wide open for the most part. That won't happen versus chicago.
There is so much football ignorance on this site....
Exhibit A above.
And a bears fan who thinks pitts D is good isn't an intelligent football fan either. NO might have the worst defense in the league.
Winston can MOVE better than fitz. Fitz is a fucking statue in the pocket. Do you actually watch the games? Or just look at stats? Yes, pitt is high in sacks, and they also blitz a ton. Or do you think a team starting bostic at MLB is a respectable NFL defense?
The better matchup for our defense is definitely fitzpatrick. We are not the steelers, we can get pressure with 3 lineman if we want. Ive watched all 3 of the TB games, and fitz had all day to throw in the NO game and his wideouts were wide open for the most part. That won't happen versus chicago.
You'd rather see a guy who has shredded 3 teams in a row including one of the top defenses and SB winner to the tune of the most yards, 2nd TD's 2nd in rating, instead of a guy who hasn't played a game in 10 months, hasn't practiced in a month, and has all kinds of shit going on mentally and personally in his life?
No. I'd rather see the guy that's a career backup, coming off a 3 int game against one of the worst back 7s in the league than the guy who has shredded the Bears D (albeit without Mack) with mobility 3 years in a row.
The stuff Winston was suspended for happened 2 years ago. I doubt there's anything mentally he's dealing with.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk