- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 42,350
- Liked Posts:
- 35,068
Does Tampa have a Bigfoot?
How da fuk would we know....
Does Tampa have a Bigfoot?
How da fuk would we know....
Killorn.
That is predicated on one of the Conn Smythe winners playing like Toews and not Arkhipov, & the 2-time Norris winner playing like Keith and not Quint.
If the 'hawks show up like they did in the final 2 periods of Game 6 v Nashville, & game 6 and 7 v Anaheim, they should win--dare I say handily. If they show up like Game 1, 2, 5, period 1 of game 6 v. Nashville, Period 2 game 1 against the wild, or game 5 v Anaheim, we're gonna get creamed. IMHO that's the key.
If we get those hawks it doesnt matter that team is unbeatable in a 7 game series. However if we get the lifeless hawks we got most of the playoffs well flip a coin on the winner. FUCKING DESPISE when the hawks play that way, pisses me off to no end.
The one thing I've been ready that concerns me is the Bolts are similar to the 2009-10 hawks (as in hungry) however that hawks team was a team of destiny and was crazy stacked. The Bolts, well they play in the shitty east.
That Hawks team had Andrew Ladd and the non-awful version of Kris Versteeg on its third line. I don't think Tampa has that kind of depth.
They dont but the more i think about it the less I take them lightly
They dont but the more i think about it the less I take them lightly
That Hawks team had Andrew Ladd and the non-awful version of Kris Versteeg on its third line. I don't think Tampa has that kind of depth.
Sure but no one really knew what we had in them until after that season. At the beginning of the year a lot of the NHL probably didn't even know who they were, figuratively of course. It's easy to look back in hindsight and see how great our depth was but during those playoffs we weren't having the conversations that we had more depth than our opponents at the time. Man I loved that damn team.
You never forget your first time.