<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="winos5" data-cid="208082" data-time="1377291114">
<div>
Details</p>
</p>
According to that Teuvo's clock has started.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</p>
</p>
Only theoretically or "temporarily" if you will. You drilled too deep into the Blackhawks Capgeek page.</p>
</p>
</p>
</p>
</p>
^ Note the "EL SR" = Entry Level Slide Rule</p>
(but what they essentially mean is that it's SR "eligible" for now is my understanding)</p>
</p>
</p>
When any contract gets signed at any level all Capgeek can reasonably do is work along default assumptions or a default baseline that it it is what it is---a face value contract because the new regular season has not started yet. They can't begin to speculate about all the vagaries of what might happen between the signing and the start of the new season i.e., does a prospect (Teravainen) get invited to come to their team's TC, does Teravainen remain uninjured over in Finland in order to come to TC, does he have a successful TC and pre-season round of games, does the team send him back to his club after the preseason games and before the regular season games, do they allow him to play 1/2/3/? regular season games (that number is what would activate any activity on the contract per the CBA), etc., etc. Since no one knows how it's going to all shakedown Teravainen's contract has to for practical reasons be considered just another contract (just like say the brand new 2013 1st Rders who have already signed ELCs) but when they chauffeur his ass to the International Terminal at O'Hare and ship him back off to Helsinki then they have clearly chosen to use the Slide Rule because since he has a contract they are officially assigning him on loan to Jokerit as long as he didn't play 10 regular season games in the NHL. I would expect once this all officially happens that Capgeek will change the 2013-14 line on Teuvo's page to explicitly read as "Entry-Level Slide" just like Danault and McNeills have for the past two seasons when the Hawks assigned them back to their CHL teams. </p>
</p>
What remains to be seen now is what they might do about 2012 picks Fournier and Whitney (both in the QMJHL). I consider both of them very promising prospects and they both had good developmental seasons this past year. They have both already turned 19 yo in 2013 and the CBA dictates that your age is calculated based on whether you are 18 or 19 yo ON Sep. 15th of the year you sign your contract for slide eligibility. So they IF they were to sign their contracts in 2013 they are 19 yo. Same boat as Teravainen really because this is the last period of time until Dec. 31st the Hawks could get 1 yr slides for them since like TT the Hawks chose not to sign them when they were 18 yo post-Draft in 2012 and get 2 years of slide like McNeill and Danault---likely because of the contracts limits chokehold the Hawks were in all of 2012-13. I mean their 2-yr post-Draft signing deadlines are next June anyway and who knows what their plans are but you'd think the Hawks would want the safety net insurance of a freeebie slide year for them just in case they wind up playing/needing them to play CHL overage seasons. </p>