TGDT: 4/24 WCQF Game 6 - Canucks (3) @ (2) Blackhawks 6:30PM CSN
- Thread starter Chief Walking Stick
- Start date
Chaps
New member
- Joined:
- May 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 103
- Liked Posts:
- 0
Back on the topic of this game, and this series... I really think winning game seven in Vancouver will be the straw that broke the proverbial camel's back. Their fanbase is dejected, confused, and grasping at any excuse they possibly can to explain the three straight losses to the Hawks. You complete that comeback on Tuesday, and I think you decimate the Vancouver team, and their fanbase, for the next ten years. DO IT!
They are all bitching about the Bieska hit, the no delay of game call... and 2 other incidents that they felt deserved penalties...
And they are all saying if they play like they did tonight in game #7 they will be fine.... I agree/disagree... If Chicago could fucking score on the PP this game wouldn't have gone to O.T and would have gotten ugly ala game 4 and 5.
Toews will be wearing that belt after game 7.. he needs a big game... CBC is going on and on about how he's frustrated and can't score.
bri
New member
- Joined:
- May 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 4,797
- Liked Posts:
- 1
Ben Smith has played great. He deserves a spot on this team next year. I hope they give him one.
R K
Guest
Chaps did CBC mention he could be injured? Bet they didn't grasp the obvious.
R K
Guest
Pez68
Fire Waldron
- Joined:
- Oct 31, 2014
- Posts:
- 5,020
- Liked Posts:
- 838
I know the flames are incoming on this comment, but did anyone think Seabrook looked a little hazy out there? I don't know what it was. He just seemed out of it for quite a few shifts. Thinking maybe he should have sat out another game to rest his melon, to be perfectly honest.
I think we probably should have won game three, and probably shouldn't have won this game. Hockey gods have a way of working things out I guess. Doesn't really matter, because now it comes down to a one game elimination. Win or go home. No holds barred on Tuesday. I just hope our defense plays better in game seven.
I think we probably should have won game three, and probably shouldn't have won this game. Hockey gods have a way of working things out I guess. Doesn't really matter, because now it comes down to a one game elimination. Win or go home. No holds barred on Tuesday. I just hope our defense plays better in game seven.
Ton
New member
- Joined:
- May 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 3,991
- Liked Posts:
- 124
- Location:
- Park Ridge, IL
Frolik has been amazing, glad to see the kid find himself. Only took him 30 games!
Chaps
New member
- Joined:
- May 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 103
- Liked Posts:
- 0
I like the bulls and all... and I hope they do well... but ****... can't they rip that floor off right after the basketball game to get us better ice? Drop the temp or something...... It's a complete disadvantage playing on shitty ice for our team.....
R K
Guest
Of course they are. If they had any brains they'd notice Toews hasn't actually been "shooting" the puck. There might just be a reason for that.
I think if the Canucks play like tonight on Tuesday they will still lose. I also think we are a better road team than home.
The fact it's at game #7 has the Canucks reeling to begin with.
Ton
New member
- Joined:
- May 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 3,991
- Liked Posts:
- 124
- Location:
- Park Ridge, IL
Seabrook sucked at the beginning of the game, no doubt in my mind. But by the end he seemed OK out there. Not great, just OK. Still better than Scott on D, and I liked him with Campoli actually.
Chaps
New member
- Joined:
- May 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 103
- Liked Posts:
- 0
Seabrook looked like crap to me... can't really blame him... Keith looked like Keith from games 1-3 too... I think the condition of the ice made the hawks not very confident in their passing.
R K
Guest
There's been no Bulls games lately. They were on the road for the last two. Not sure why the puck was bouncing like a ball today. It wasn't exactly warm here today or yesterday either.
Pez68
Fire Waldron
- Joined:
- Oct 31, 2014
- Posts:
- 5,020
- Liked Posts:
- 838
You know, thinking about it, we probably should have won this game, too. The first two goals Vancouver had, were fluky garbage. That first goal took two shitty deflections and then got past Crawford. One off the defenseman's stick, and the second off of Crawford's stick. The second goal, takes an absolutely TERRIBLE bounce over Campoli's stick, and Crawford just didn't seem to be ready for it. Two gift goals, if you ask me. Again, **** the Canucks.
Chaps
New member
- Joined:
- May 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 103
- Liked Posts:
- 0
Well the Canucks hit 2 posts, and dominated us in the 3rd period.. From about midway through the 2nd the hawks were making terrible passes and had no sustained forecheck or puck possession in their zone. However... Had we scored on our PP's... it would have been a blow out like the previous games.
Chaps
New member
- Joined:
- May 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 103
- Liked Posts:
- 0
R K
Guest
Hawks hit two cross bars in the 3rd but I get where your going. We have played shakey at home verses on the road.
We'll see which goalie starts on Tuesday.
Pez68
Fire Waldron
- Joined:
- Oct 31, 2014
- Posts:
- 5,020
- Liked Posts:
- 838
I think he needs to stop the first and the second, to be honest. Looked like the second goal handcuffed him because he wasn't expecting the shot at all.
The Hawks looked TIRED after the second period. Like, really tired. I hope they don't look like that Tuesday.
bri
New member
- Joined:
- May 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 4,797
- Liked Posts:
- 1
Gotta love Bolland. He makes me laugh when you see his expressions. You never know what all those voices in his head are saying,
R K
Guest
That was Keiths turn over. I don't get how different of a game Keith had tonight. Not the same fire the past two games.