TGDT: WCF Game 3 - 5/24 Kings (1) vs. (1) Blackhawks 7:00PM NBC

[Variable]

See, if Handzus hadn't taken that dumb penalty Toews never would've scored that short handed goal.</p>


 </p>


Ah, back to shit.</p>

 

[Pez68]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Spunky Porkstacker" data-cid="230499" data-time="1400977509">


I'm sure your world is absolute perfection with never a bump in the road.</p></blockquote>


I do my best to avoid the bumps and if I can't I deal with them instead of just accepting them.

 

[Spunky Porkstacker]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Pez68" data-cid="230498" data-time="1400977288">

Nope. I'm just always looking for improvement. But I guess that's a bad thing in some people's eyes. Thankfully my bosses haven't shared that opinion.</p></blockquote>


It's a good thing your underlings aren't paid as much as you because then they would be expected to match your performance, or maybe everyone you work with gets paid the same as you and performs as well as you. Imagine the possibilities if such a dream team were really possible.

 

[Pez68]

If the underlings are fucking up do you just say oh well it is what is? Or do you point out the areas that need improvement, and replace those underlings if they are INCAPABLE of improving?


Keep digging the hole though.

 

[Pez68]

Toews just putting the team on his back. As usual.

 

[Spunky Porkstacker]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Pez68" data-cid="230504" data-time="1400978774">
<div>


If the underlings are fucking up do you just say oh well it is what is? Or do you point out the areas that need improvement, and replace those underlings if they are INCAPABLE of improving?


Keep digging the hole though.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>


 </p>


Doubt your company is working with a salary cap so replacing inept team members isn't always so easy.</p>

 

[Spunky Porkstacker]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Pez68" data-cid="230505" data-time="1400979053">
<div>


Toews just putting the team on his back. As usual.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>


 </p>


That just sucks</p>

 

[Pez68]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Spunky Porkstacker" data-cid="230506" data-time="1400979890">


Doubt your company is working with a salary cap so replacing inept team members isn't always so easy.</p></blockquote>


LOL. Yeah, businesses don't have a budget for salary.... They don't have to get all raises or new positions approved. Seriously?

 

[Pez68]

If we want to keep going with this analogy, you don't put a senile old man working on the helpdesk in charge of, say, your Exchange infrastructure. Which is basically what Q is doing putting Handjob on the second line.

 

[puckjim]

It'd be nice to get Kane going.


Get that 26-88 connection firing again like it did in the regular season.

 

[Spunky Porkstacker]

26-88+who ever is a winning line combo. 4th line players make such a big difference.</p>

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

Raanta time.</p>

 

[Pez68]

Handzus strikes again. Is that one of his great defensive plays?

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

</p>

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

.............. Raanta time.</p>

 

[Pez68]

Sharp has to be off of the PP. HAS TO.

 

[cplmac]

What in the **** is Q doing, Bollig, Sharp and Versteeg on the fucking power play?   Are you fucking kidding me?   We are absolutely fucked six ways from Sunday if this is the coaching we can expect for the next two games.</p>

 

[cplmac]

I said it three days ago, Sharp needs to be healthy scratched, and where was Shaw on that PP?</p>

 

[cplmac]

Sharp on the power play again, misses the net by four fucking feet.</p>

 

[cplmac]

Versteeg on the PP again, AWESOME</p>