TGDT: WCSF - 5/2 Wild (0) @ Blackhawks (0) 8:30PM NBCSN

[Chief Walking Stick]

<p style="text-align:center;"><u><span style="font-size:18px;">WESTERN CONFERENCE SEMI FINALS</span></u></p><p style="text-align:center;">
<span style="font-size:24px;">GAME 1</span>

<span style="font-size:18px;"> vs</span>.

<span style="font-size:36px;">(0) ------- (0)</span>

<u><span style="font-size:18px;">RESULTS</span></u>

Game 1:</p>

 

[Variable]

Just gotta wait on who wins  the Kings-Ducks series now. I'd like to see a rematch. Hell, why not a rematch of both Conference Finals for that matter.</p>

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Variable" data-cid="228151" data-time="1398919757">

Just gotta wait on who wins  the Kings-Ducks series now. I'd like to see a rematch.</p></blockquote>
Why? Kings are up 5-1 and it has no bearing on this matchup.

 

[Variable]

The Kings-Ducks series.</p>

 

[PatrickShart]

I think the MTL series is going to be the best

 

[PatrickShart]

I think it's mtl in 6

 

[Ton]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="pmxcodano" data-cid="228165" data-time="1398920690">
<div>


I think the MTL series is going to be the best</p>
</div>
</blockquote>


 </p>


 </p>
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="pmxcodano" data-cid="228166" data-time="1398920703">
<div>


I think it's mtl in 6</p>
</div>
</blockquote>


 </p>


Agreed. Although, might be tough with such a long rest to keep the momentum going, plus Boston has a lot more experience. I think whoever wins that series ends up in the Finals.</p>

 

[the canadian dream]

Boston in 6 you guys are fucking crazy. Just because its a rivalry doesn't mean the Habs are still a team with the depth anywhere near to match the Bruins.</p>


 </p>


 </p>


idiots</p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


Hawks are going to have no issues with the Wild other than the one game the officials give them and the one game the Hawks give them in ot because they are bored.</p>


 </p>


Hawks in 6</p>

 

[Ton]

I like Price better than the headcase at the other end.</p>

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

 

[the canadian dream]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Tony DeFrancesco" data-cid="228170" data-time="1398920972">
<div>


I like Price better than the headcase at the other end.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>


because Price isn't a head case?</p>


 </p>


head case racist</p>

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="The Canadian Dreamalchuk" data-cid="228177" data-time="1398921149">

because Price isn't a head case?
 
head case racist</p></blockquote>
tony wants the mormons to win.... typical racist....

..... oh wait "colorado" lost....

 

[CLWolf81]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Variable" data-cid="228153" data-time="1398919837">
<div>


The Kings-Ducks series.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>


 </p>


That series will be bloody, it will be violent... and if I went, I'd need bail money. Those fanbases do NOT like each other at all and it might get entertaining to see shit happening in the stands more than on the ice....  The police might even get involved in many ways....  


And did I mention there's a great hockey game on the ice? -.- 


I totally agree with the above statement. I see it going 7. </p>

 

[winos5]

Hawks just win.</p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


 </p>


(in 6)</p>

 

[CLWolf81]

Agreed. NBC gives the Wild 2 games to keep ratings... lol</p>

 

[PatrickShart]

I think CBS wants it to go in 5...and Minny winning</p>

 

[LordKOTL]

The playoff modified records for the teams are: </p>


'hawks, 1 win (5-1)</p>


Wild, 3 wins (5-3, 4-3, 2-1)</p>


1 effective tie ('hawks shootout win 3-2)</p>


 </p>


I like that a bit better than Colorado's record against us, and I do think we'll have out work cut out for us, but really I think the 'hawks take this in 6. Most of the games were really close.  It will probably be as difficult as St Louis.</p>


 </p>


I just hope Bollig ends up killing Dany "Bastard lovechild of Don Knotts and Orville Reddenbacher" Heatley</p>

 

[Ashor-redtribe]

I Know Im looking ahead, but a Hawks vs Canadians SC. Would be eppic. just not the 1972 result.</p>

 

[PatrickSharpRules]

I am looking for some more of where we left off on Sunday. Like the Blues, if Minnesota wants to run with us they will lose. </p>


 </p>


Judging by some of the goals I saw in the Avs series it will be nice to have the middle of the ice back. If Minnesota plays D like they did last night it will be tough for them to advance. </p>


 </p>


Saying 5-3 Hawks tomorrow night. </p>

 

[CLWolf81]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="LordKOTL" data-cid="228217" data-time="1398955318">
<div>


The playoff modified records for the teams are: </p>


'hawks, 1 win (5-1)</p>


Wild, 3 wins (5-3, 4-3, 2-1)</p>


1 effective tie ('hawks shootout win 3-2)</p>


 </p>


I like that a bit better than Colorado's record against us, and I do think we'll have out work cut out for us, but really I think the 'hawks take this in 6. Most of the games were really close.  It will probably be as difficult as St Louis.</p>


 </p>


I just hope Bollig ends up killing Dany "Bastard lovechild of Don Knotts and Orville Reddenbacher" Heatley</p>
</div>
</blockquote>



I'm glad someone agrees with me. 


Doesn't mean this series won't be difficult. I just don't like teams trying to outskate us like Colorado would have. 


With shaky goaltending behind Minnesota's pipes as well, I want to see us take full advantage of that with some good ol' aggressive forechecking. We SHOULD be the Hawks of last year in this series. </p>