Given that we had the highest payroll in the NL in 2010, I get a lot of questions about our payroll commitment for 2011. As I said earlier, we are still working on our 2011 baseball plan, so it is hard to be too specific at this time. What I can tell you is that our overall baseball budget (scouting, player development and payroll) will be about the same in 2011 as it was in 2010.
Which was bullshit.
They cut basically $22M from the payroll from 2010 to 2011.
No chance in hell they spent all $22M on scouting and player development. They did spend $7M more on draft spending in 2011, despite the fact that clearly Jim Hendry begged him not to spend the money since he was dead set on totally ignoring the farm system. But that still leaves $15M on scouting and player development.
No fucking chance.
Continued long term success will come through superior scouting and player development, and we are committed to improving that facet of the organization. As a result, this likely means a shift of some of our resources from the major league payroll toward scouting and player development, but we are still very much in the evaluation phase.
So they say they want to have superior scouting and player development but also somehow have to pick in the top 5 in draft??
Doesn't that kinda seem like wasting those resources by picking that high? We are all a bunch of message board idiots but can come up with the top 2-3 prospects available this draft.
You would think if you had such superior scouting and player development, you wouldn't have to depend so much on picking so high in the draft and would be smart enough to be able to find the players like Jose Fernandez, Chris Sale, Shelby Miller, Mike Trout or Jason Heyward that have been picked in the teens or later of the first round in recent drafts.