Thomas Brown for Head Coach

[remydat]

You really are still struggling with this? I posted all the "almost INT" I found in the Waldron games.. Now add up all the screenshots I posted and let me know what Number you get.

(spoilers its 0)

Feel free to do your own research and let me know what you find and I would be happy to critique all your screenshots as well. Its possible I might of missed one. It will also be telling what you consider a "almost INT" as well based on your screenshots..

And for the love of God remy DO NOT post screenshots of fumbles!

So again you lied. You claimed you had screenshots and now confirming you dont. Your whole presence in this thread has been one lie after another.

 

[dbldrew]

So again you lied. You claimed you had screenshots and now confirming you dont. Your whole presence in this thread has been one lie after another.

I said I posted all the screenshots from what I found from the waldron games. Why are you still struggling with this?

How can you post a screenshot of something that doesnt exist? I also invited you to do your own research and see if I missed any. The fact you havent posted any means you agree that there wasnt any "almost INT".

Thanks for acknowledging that I was correct.

 

[remydat]

I said I posted all the screenshots from what I found from the waldron games. Why are you still struggling with this?

How can you post a screenshot of something that doesnt exist? I also invited you to do your own research and see if I missed any. The fact you havent posted any means you agree that there wasnt any "almost INT".

Thanks for acknowledging that I was correct.

Sir you claimed you posted screenshots but then admitted you didnt. So again you lied.

The other reason your trolling is dumb is you already acknowledged PFF's 9 TWPs under Waldron. It is stistically absurd and obvious bias to claim PFF understated almost int under Brown by 300-700% but then also claim they overstated Waldrons almost Ints by 100%. They no reason to be biased against Waldron but you do so it is obvious you are lying about that too.

So I dont need to do anything. I trust PFFs data over a guy that has lied and been wrong numerous times. You have zero credibility.

 

[dbldrew]

Sir you claimed you posted screenshots but then admitted you didnt. So again you lied.

The other reason your trolling is dumb is you already acknowledged PFF's 9 TWPs under Waldron. It is stistically absurd and obvious bias to claim PFF understated almost int under Brown by 300-700% but then also claim they overstated Waldrons almost Ints by 100%. They no reason to be biased against Waldron but you do so it is obvious you are lying about that too.

So I dont need to do anything. I trust PFFs data over a guy that has lied and been wrong numerous times. You have zero credibility.

I did post screenshots, I went through all the Waldron games along with the Lions game and posted all the screenshots of the "almost INT"

have not done any more Brown games yet because all the "almost INT" where from the lions game and 0 from the waldron game, so there isnt any point in finding more with the Brown games.

You are back to the PFF fumble stat again? how many times do I have to remind you that we are NOT TALKING FUMBLES. I understand you get confused easily but try and stay on track here.. Fumbles are different then INT so lets leave the fumbles out of it.. it has nothing to do with the debate about passing..

SO again I went through all the Waldron games and found/posted 0 "almost INT" fell free to do your own evaluation and see if I missed any and post up the screenshots.

You like to say that I lied or I'm wrong. But you keep refusing to actually post up the screenshots to prove I'm wrong. Even though I have asked you multiple times to do so.. Be my guest.. prove me wrong with screenshots if you want. But remember dont post screenshots of fumbles, try and stay focused here.. its only "almost INT"

good luck and I cant wait to see your results!

 

[1COBearsfan]

This thread is amazing. Thank you guys

 

[Calabis]

My rumor lmao: Poles will hire Vrabel and his OC will be Bieniemy....let dick ripping began

Why.......Vrabel was in KC as was Eric while Poles was there

Eric was with Vikings when Warren was there

 

[remydat]

I did post screenshots, I went through all the Waldron games along with the Lions game and posted all the screenshots of the "almost INT"

have not done any more Brown games yet because all the "almost INT" where from the lions game and 0 from the waldron game, so there isnt any point in finding more with the Brown games.

You are back to the PFF fumble stat again? how many times do I have to remind you that we are NOT TALKING FUMBLES. I understand you get confused easily but try and stay on track here.. Fumbles are different then INT so lets leave the fumbles out of it.. it has nothing to do with the debate about passing..

SO again I went through all the Waldron games and found/posted 0 "almost INT" fell free to do your own evaluation and see if I missed any and post up the screenshots.

You like to say that I lied or I'm wrong. But you keep refusing to actually post up the screenshots to prove I'm wrong. Even though I have asked you multiple times to do so.. Be my guest.. prove me wrong with screenshots if you want. But remember dont post screenshots of fumbles, try and stay focused here.. its only "almost INT"

good luck and I cant wait to see your results!

You admitted you lied so I dont need to post anything. If you say that you posted screen shots of almost Ints from the Waldron game yet admit you posted 0 then you lied. The only way for you not to have lied is for you to have posted at least 1 screenshot from Waldron but you posted 0. The concept of 0 is something my 3 year old understands so not sure why you don't.
So it seems we are stuck here as if you cant grasp that posting 0 screenshots means you lied then you are two stupid to continue arguing with.

 

[TheEarlofRobin]

This thread is amazing. Thank you guys

It reminds me of the Academy Awards.....built on a ridiculous premise (Thomas Brown for HC!), and then you get drunk Al Pacino babbling, go to commercial break, come back to the show and its still Al Pacino babbling. remydat is a special person.

 

[1COBearsfan]

It reminds me of the Academy Awards.....built on a ridiculous premise (Thomas Brown for HC!), and then you get drunk Al Pacino babbling, go to commercial break, come back to the show and its still Al Pacino babbling. remydat is a special person.

While I don’t agree with remy about this, he’s not the one I was talking about

 

[TheEarlofRobin]

While I don’t agree with remy about this, he’s not the one I was talking about

please specify

 

[SiDe WaYs]

My rumor lmao: Poles will hire Vrabel and his OC will be Bieniemy....let dick ripping began

Why.......Vrabel was in KC as was Eric while Poles was there

Eric was with Vikings when Warren was there

Why does this make so much sense? Like I actually see the Bears doing this. Ugh

 

[1COBearsfan]

please specify

Remy is at least trying to support his argument with data. All of you other clowns are just screeching your opinions into the void. And, I get it. Everyone has been pulled into a remy black hole because he can’t just shut the hell up every once in a while.

 

[TheEarlofRobin]

Remy is at least trying to support his argument with data. All of you other clowns are just screeching your opinions into the void. And, I get it. Everyone has been pulled into a remy black hole because he can’t just shut the hell up every once in a while.

I agree. I guess I am torn because is it better or worse when you try support your argument with data and still make no sense?

 

[Calabis]

Why does this make so much sense? Like I actually see the Bears doing this. Ugh

I was thinking Vrabel gives them the strong coach needed, maybe gets Saleh on board as DC and Eric is known to be hard and detailed, and gets the Mahomes comparison clone to work with.

 

[dbldrew]

You admitted you lied so I dont need to post anything. If you say that you posted screen shots of almost Ints from the Waldron game yet admit you posted 0 then you lied. The only way for you not to have lied is for you to have posted at least 1 screenshot from Waldron but you posted 0. The concept of 0 is something my 3 year old understands so not sure why you don't.
So it seems we are stuck here as if you cant grasp that posting 0 screenshots means you lied then you are two stupid to continue arguing with.

I never admitted I lied, I said I posted screenshots of all the "almost INT" from all the Walrdon games and the Lions games. Thats not a lie. If I cant find any from the Waldon game that would = 0 Waldron game screenshots. How are you still confused by this?

Here let me go through all the Bagent TD passes from this year in reg season.. I will post all the screenshots of Bagents TD I find below..




there you go.. count up all the Bagent Reg season TD passes that you see above.. Do you see any screenshots of Bagent TD? well am I lieing about all the Bagent TD? or did I just post all the screenshots I could find which is 0 TD this year? the fact that you are still so confused by this is a little frightening. If Bagent has 0 reg season TD this year, then you would get 0 screenshots.. see how that works? If I could find a grand total of 0 "almost INT" from the Waldron games then there would also be 0 screenshots. A 3 year old could figure this out. Remy are you as dumb as a 3 year old?

Now I also said its possibe I might of missed one, Thats not saying I'm lying thats me saying I might of made a mistake. I invited you to do your own checking and see if you can find any that I might of missed and we can then do the math and see if I need to look for more in the Brown games..


Now I suspect you have already looked and you couldnt find any as well. But in your vortex of stupidity you think it would be better to portray yourself as someone that is a dumb as a 3 year old rather then admit you where wrong..

Either way if you are comfortable showing the world you are a moron then go for it..

 

[PrideisBears]

Almost 1k post, boys

 

[dbldrew]

Almost 1k post, boys

got to just keep the vortex spinning and we could double that easily!

 

[remydat]

I never admitted I lied, I said I posted screenshots of all the "almost INT" from all the Walrdon games and the Lions games. Thats not a lie. If I cant find any from the Waldon game that would = 0 Waldron game screenshots. How are you still confused by this?

Here let me go through all the Bagent TD passes from this year in reg season.. I will post all the screenshots of Bagents TD I find below..




there you go.. count up all the Bagent Reg season TD passes that you see above.. Do you see any screenshots of Bagent TD? well am I lieing about all the Bagent TD? or did I just post all the screenshots I could find which is 0 TD this year? the fact that you are still so confused by this is a little frightening. If Bagent has 0 reg season TD this year, then you would get 0 screenshots.. see how that works? If I could find a grand total of 0 "almost INT" from the Waldron games then there would also be 0 screenshots. A 3 year old could figure this out. Remy are you as dumb as a 3 year old?

Now I also said its possibe I might of missed one, Thats not saying I'm lying thats me saying I might of made a mistake. I invited you to do your own checking and see if you can find any that I might of missed and we can then do the math and see if I need to look for more in the Brown games..


Now I suspect you have already looked and you couldnt find any as well. But in your vortex of stupidity you think it would be better to portray yourself as someone that is a dumb as a 3 year old rather then admit you where wrong..

Either way if you are comfortable showing the world you are a moron then go for it..

If you say you are posting screen shots and then admit you posted 0 screen shots then you are admiting you are lying.

PFF has 9 TWP under Waldron. I dont need to look for any screenshots to know you are lying. PFF is far more credible than you are liar.

 

[1COBearsfan]

I agree. I guess I am torn because is it better or worse when you try support your argument with data and still make no sense?

I’m not sifting back through this dumpster fire but I think his basic premise was that(before the Vikings beatdown) Caleb was playing measurably better under Brown(strictly as an OC) than he was under Waldron. I’m not sure how that can be argued against. Then this opinion was twisted into the offense as a whole playing better, which is not his original argument.

But whatever, the whole team is a shit show.

 

[remydat]

I’m not sifting back through this dumpster fire but I think his basic premise was that(before the Vikings beatdown) Caleb was playing measurably better under Brown(strictly as an OC) than he was under Waldron. I’m not sure how that can be argued against. Then this opinion was twisted into the offense as a whole playing better, which is not his original argument.

But whatever, the whole team is a shit show.

This is CCS. People dont read with a goal of rational discourse. They prefer to **** and twist arguments around to fill whatever void in their lives exists because of the Bears sucking.

The premise of the thread was simple. If and only if Caleb played well for the 8 games Brown would be his OC then the Bears may make him OC.

Caleb played well enough IMO the first 3 games but ever since the Bears caved to the mob and idiot players he has struggled more. Exactly why I said they should have left Flus alone and let Brown focus on Caleb. There was no point in risking the Collapse that is now evident for all to see and have Brown distracted from developing Caleb because he now had to coach the whole team.